Growth in SNAP retailers followed enrollment spike during recession

November 09, 2016

Increased enrollment in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program in Georgia contributed to the growth of grocery retailers at all levels from 2007 to 2014.

A new paper from University of Georgia researchers used U. S. Department of Agriculture and Georgia Division of Family and Children Services data sets to track the increase in retailers accepting SNAP benefits during what is known as the Great Recession.

The publicly available data suggest that increased enrollment in the program improves access to food for SNAP beneficiaries by acting as an indirect subsidy to retailers.

The study, "Growth in SNAP Retailers Was Associated With Increased Client Enrollment in Georgia During the Great Recession," was published in the November issue of Health Affairs. The paper connects enrollment increases with the growth in the number of food retailers.

The researchers divided food stores into four categories: large, midsize, small and specialty retailers. Between 2008 and 2011, the number of SNAP enrollees increased by 87 percent; between 2007 and 2014, the number of SNAP retailers in Georgia increased by 82 percent, primarily due to growth in the number of small retailers.

"In one of the roughest economic patches of the last 100 years, we see this huge boom in stores, which seems counterintuitive. During the recession, rather than closing their doors, we saw the number of SNAP retailers double," said Jerry Shannon assistant professor in the UGA Franklin College of Arts and Sciences department of geography and lead author on the study. "I think that points to the fact that SNAP is very much an economic stimulus and that during times of economic hardship, stores rely on SNAP as much as consumers might. Especially for small stores, it can be a vital source of financial support."

The study differentiates how much of the growth was represented by the opening of new stores versus existing stores becoming authorized SNAP retailers. For small stores like the Dollar General chains, gas stations, convenience stores and pharmacies, the breakdown was split roughly 50-50.

"SNAP is framed often, and rightly so, as an important support for people who have low incomes. It defrays food insecurity, provides counter-cyclical support for folks when the economy is tough and then tails off when things get better," Shannon said. "That's important, but from practically the genesis of the program, it was designed to support retailers during those rough times as well."

The foundation for SNAP was the 1933 Agricultural Adjustment Act. The program, referred to as the Federal Surplus Relief Corporation, was established during the Great Depression, when prices for crops fell and farms across America were struggling to deal with the excess supply. To support farmers, the federal government purchased basic farm commodities at discount prices and distributed them among hunger relief agencies in states and local communities.

To formalize food distribution and to avoid duplicating efforts by local relief agencies, the Food Stamp Program was first implemented in 1939 under the administration of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Over time, the program changed and evolved, maintaining its goal to achieve a more effective use of agricultural overproduction, improve levels of nutrition among individuals with low incomes and provide an economic stimulus to farmers, distributors and retailers. In 2015, the program served over 45 million individuals, and over 250,000 retailers were authorized to accept SNAP benefits nationwide.

"When we think about food deserts, or food accessibility, SNAP can help support stores, as it already does in low-income neighborhoods," Shannon said. "But it also highlights the dependence of those stores on SNAP. During the recent economic downturn, convenience stores were most sensitive to the increased enrollment, though they are not generally places where we think of buying healthy foods."

Shannon says the research supports new rule changes proposed by the USDA that would require SNAP retailers to provide healthy food as an effective way of improving access to healthy foods more generally.

"The data support interventions that would try to help improve nutritional quality of foods available to consumers. It also suggests how SNAP might be useful for other alternative food sites like farmers markets or other local food efforts--programs that help consumers link up with nearby producers," he said.
Co-authors on the study are Sarah Shannon, assistant professor in the department of sociology in UGA's Franklin College; Grace Bagwell Adams, assistant professor in the department of health policy and management in the UGA College of Public Health; and Jung Sun Lee, associate professor in the department of foods and nutrition in the UGA College of Family and Consumer Sciences.

University of Georgia

Related Recession Articles from Brightsurf:

Domestic violence increased in the great recession
Researchers found that physical abuse in adults increased substantially, with Black and Native American people being disproportionately affected.

Can we estimate the time until the next recession?
As the world economy is falling into one of the biggest contractions of the last decades, a new study of economic recession patterns finds that the likelihood of a downturn was high even before the onset of the Coronavirus crisis.

Extreme weather could bring next recession
Despite obvious market risks brought by fires, floods and other events, asset managers are slow to react.

Job losses during the Great Recession may be responsible for decline in US birth rates
New research published this month in the Southern Economic Journal reveals job losses during the Great Recession (2007-2009) may be partly responsible for the recent drop in U.S. birth rates.

School spending cuts triggered by great recession linked to sizable learning losses for learning losses for students in hardest hit areas
Substantial school spending cuts triggered by the Great Recession were associated with sizable losses in academic achievement for students living in counties most affected by the economic downturn, according to a new study published today in AERA Open, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Educational Research Association.

Hardship during the Great Recession linked with lasting mental health declines
People who suffered a financial, housing-related, or job-related hardship as a result of the Great Recession were more likely to show increases in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and problematic drug use, research shows.

Inequality gap grew before the Great Recession and after, study finds
The Great Recession hit Americans across the socioeconomic spectrum, but the drivers behind these socioeconomic divides were mounting before the decline even hit, according to a paper published in PLOS ONE.

The 2008 recession associated with greater decline in mortality in Europe
In recent decades, Europe has experienced a downward trend in the annual number of deaths.

New report details experiences of graduates with student loan debt during the Great Recession
Most non-borrowers (81 percent) reported that their undergraduate education was worth the cost, compared with 69 percent of graduates who took out student loans.

The Great Recession took a toll on public health, study finds
The Great Recession, spanning 2008 to 2010, was associated with heightened cardiovascular risk factors, including increased blood pressure and glucose levels, according to a new UCLA-led study.

Read More: Recession News and Recession Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to