Nav: Home

Exclusive: Biotechnology leaders surveyed about impact of Trump presidency

November 11, 2016

New Rochelle, Nov 11, 2016--The day following the election of Donald J. Trump as President, a survey of leaders in biotechnology in the United States, conducted by GENETIC ENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLGY NEWS (GEN) showed that Trump's presidency will negatively impact NIH research funding as well as STEM education; a plurality said it will also spark a "brain drain" as foreign-born researchers educated in American universities will be more likely to leave.

Over 1600 professionals, from industry and academia, responded to the survey.

The largest majority, 57.11%, believe that the president-elect will hurt research funding. 24.26% said it would not make a difference, and 9.79% said Trump's presidency would prove positive.

One respondent expects, however, that industry will seek to outsource R&D to US academic labs: "If done wisely, perhaps there's a chance such a scheme could augment private funding for life science research."

During the campaign, Trump hinted at possible support for higher NIH budgets, even as he has called for cutting federal spending: "We must make the commitment to invest in science, engineering, healthcare and other areas that will make the lives of Americans better, safer and more prosperous," he has said.

51.74%, believe that science-technology-engineering-mathematics (STEM) will not be a priority under a Trump administration. 29.25% are uncertain, but 19.01% believe that a Trump administration will focus attention on STEM education.

"The biotechnology industry faces the possibility of a brain drain, and this is most alarming," said Mary Ann Liebert, founder and CEO of the 35 year old publication. A 46.78% plurality of respondents say they believed that foreign-born scientists who have been educated in the U.S. will be more likely to leave during a Trump presidency.

"GEN will continue to survey the field as Trump makes appointments in the cabinet and other positions, said Ms. Liebert. "The biotechnology community, like many others, was not prepared for a Trump victory; they must be on high alert to assure that one of this country's premier enterprises will not be compromised. In general, scientists are not political activists by nature, and this has to change."

A large plurality (49.81%) opined that overseas researchers will still seek academic positions or jobs in the US biotech industry; "but I think there will be fewer [of them applying]," a respondent predicted. 30.21% said they were uncertain, and 19.97%, disagreed.

While Trump has proposed allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices as a means of lowering ever-rising prescription drug prices, and even called "pharma bro" Martin Shkreli, the Turing Pharmaceuticals' founder who received severe criticism earlier this year after raising the price of a toxoplasmosis therapy from $13.50 to $750 per pill, "a spoiled brat," close to half of respondents doubt that the president-elect will seek to contain those prices once he is sworn into office. Only 23.01% think Trump will do so, while twice that percentage (46.59%) believe he won't. The remaining 30.40% are uncertain. 56.22% of respondents believe a Trump presidency will affect the value of shares in publicly-traded biopharmas; 28.74% are uncertain, and 15.03% do not foresee any effect.

That view may have been swayed by yesterday's Wall Street rally, which reversed the stock selloff seen immediately after Trump won his electoral-vote majority. Three key exchange-traded funds for biotechs showed gains in the first trading day since Election Day: The iShares NASDAQ Biotechnology exchange traded fund (ETF) rose 9% to $284.99, as did the New York Stock Exchange Arca Biotechnology Index, which soared to $3,320.78, while the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF jumped 10% to $63.78.

"Values in publicly-traded companies will be affected, but I think that this will be mostly short- to intermediate-term," a survey respondent observed.

Opinions were more mixed on whether corporate funding of life sciences research will be impacted: 42.89% say it will, 26.22% say it won't, and 30.89% say they are uncertain.

Businesses would benefit, one respondent said, if Trump can lower the nation's corporate tax rate from 35% to 15%:

"Biopharma companies will remain located in the US rather than leaving to countries with lower tax rates. This will result in an increase in biopharma jobs and act as a magnet to bring international researchers to the US."

Whether Trump can achieve that tax cut, or other measures that benefit biopharma, remains uncertain.
Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, which is published 21 times a year by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., is the most widely read biotechnology news magazine worldwide. It includes articles on Drug Discovery, Bioprocessing, OMICS, Biobusiness, and Translational Medicine.

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc./Genetic Engineering News

Related Biotechnology Articles:

Biotechnology to the rescue of Brussels sprouts
An international team has identified the genes that make these plants resistant to the pathogen that attacks crops belonging to the cabbage family all over the world.
UM professor co-authors report on the use of biotechnology in forests
University of Montana Professor Diana Six is one of 12 authors of a new report that addresses the potential for biotechnology to provide solutions for protecting forest trees from insect and pathogen outbreaks, which are increasing because of climate change and expanded global trade.
Faster genome evolution methods to transform yeast for industrial biotechnology
A research team led by Prof. DAI Junbiao at the Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (SIAT) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, in collaboration with Prof.
New innovations in cell-free biotechnology
Professor Michael Jewett's new platform to conduct cell-free protein synthesis could lead to improved quality of manufactured protein therapeutics and biomaterials.
Silk 'micrococoons' could be used in biotechnology and medicine
Microscopic versions of the cocoons spun by silkworms have been manufactured by a team of researchers.
More Biotechnology News and Biotechnology Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...