Army researcher promotes cooperation between humans, autonomous machines

November 12, 2019

The trust between humans and autonomous machines is a top priority for Army researchers -- as machines become integral to society, it is critical to understand the impact on human decision-making.

Dr. Celso M. de Melo, a computer scientist from the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command's Army Research Laboratory at its ARL West campus in Playa Vista, California, along with Japan's Gifu University Professor Kazunori Terada, share common research interests, in particular, on human-machine cooperation and the social effects of emotion in human-machine interaction. Their research shows people readily engage in social categorization distinguishing humans from machines, which leads to reduced cooperation with machines.

A simple cultural cue-the ethnicity of the machine's virtual face-mitigated this bias for participants from two distinct cultures (Japan and United States), the researchers said.

"Our research shows that situational cues of affiliative intent-namely, expressions of emotion-overrode expectations of coalition alliances from social categories," de Melo said. "When machines were from a different culture, participants showed the usual bias when competitive emotion was shown -- such as joy following exploitation and in contrast, participants cooperated just as much with humans as machines that expressed cooperative emotion - such as joy following cooperation."

A fundamental challenge for the adoption of AI in the Army, this research is particularly relevant for the Army's Next Generation Combat Vehicle modernization priority, as it proposes solutions to promote effective human-machine teaming, de Melo said.

"Research reveals a fundamental bias, whereby humans make decisions with machines that are less favorable than if the partners were humans," de Melo said. "It is as if machines are treated, by default, as out-group members. The research advances two solutions for overcoming this bias based on social categorization: associating positive social groups with machines - and emotion, and expression of emotion by machines that communicate an affiliative intent."

The next step is to apply and test these findings in Army-relevant domains, such as warfighter interaction with autonomous (ground and air) vehicles, robots and virtual partners, he said.
To read the research paper in full, go to Plos One Journal.

The U.S. Army engages its scientists and engineers to develop science and technology solutions to build the Army of tomorrow. Officials plan to complete the Modernization Strategy by 2028.

The CCDC Army Research Laboratory (ARL) is an element of the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command. As the Army's corporate research laboratory, ARL discovers, innovates and transitions science and technology to ensure dominant strategic land power. Through collaboration across the command's core technical competencies, CCDC leads in the discovery, development and delivery of the technology-based capabilities required to make Soldiers more lethal to win our Nation's wars and come home safely. CCDC is a major subordinate command of the U.S. Army Futures Command.

U.S. Army Research Laboratory

Related Cooperation Articles from Brightsurf:

Betrayal or cooperation? Analytical investigation of behavior drivers
At the macroscopic level, there are numerous examples of people cooperating to form groupings.

How does cooperation evolve?
In nature, organisms often support each other in order to gain an advantage.

Simulating cooperation in local communities
In new research published in EPJ B, a new simulation-based approach is introduced which could help to reduce the proportion of people who misuse welfare payoffs, through a cost-effective system which rewards individuals who use them responsibly.

Cooperation can be contagious particularly when people see the benefit for others
Seeing someone do something good for someone else motivates witnesses to perform their own helpful acts, an insight that could help drive cooperative behavior in communities navigating through the health crisis.

Cultivating cooperation through kinship
Extensive cooperation among biologically unrelated individuals is uniquely human. It would be surprising if this uniqueness were not related to other uniquely human characteristics, yet current theories of human cooperation tend to ignore the human aspects of human behavior.

As farming developed, so did cooperation -- and violence
The growth of agriculture led to unprecedented cooperation in human societies, a team of researchers, has found, but it also led to a spike in violence, an insight that offers lessons for the present.

Cooperation after eye contact: Gender matters
Researchers from the UB published an article in the journal Scientific Reports which analyses, through the prisoner's dilemma game, the willingness of people to cooperate when in pairs.

How employees' rankings disrupt cooperation and how managers can restore it
First prize is a Cadillac Eldorado, second prize a set of steak knives, third prize you're firedĀ».

Sex for cooperation
To understand the origins of human sociality studying the social dynamics of our closest relatives, chimpanzees and bonobos, is important.

Migration can promote or inhibit cooperation between individuals
A new mathematical analysis suggests that migration can generate patterns in the spatial distribution of individuals that promote cooperation and allow populations to thrive, in spite of the threat of exploitation.

Read More: Cooperation News and Cooperation Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to