High rates of caesarean section do not reflect women's preferences

November 15, 2001

Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study BMJ Volume 323, pp 1155-58

Editorial: Promoting normality in childbirth BMJ Volume 323, pp 1142-3


Recent concerns surrounding high rates of caesarean section have led to a focus on increasing the numbers of women who have a straightforward vaginal birth. A study in this week's BMJ finds that the extremely high rates of caesarean section in Brazil do not necessarily reflect women's preferences for this type of delivery.

Over 1100 pregnant women in Brazil (717 public patients and 419 private patients) were interviewed three times about their preferences for delivery - twice during their pregnancy and again a month after their expected due date. The rates of caesarean delivery were 31% in the public sector and 72% in the private sector.

Despite large differences in the rates of caesarean section in the two sectors, there were no significant differences in preferences between the two groups. In both antenatal interviews, 70-80% in both sectors said they would prefer to deliver vaginally. This finding contradicts the assumed belief that middle and upper class women in Brazil prefer caesarean deliveries. Another finding is many of the patients who had caesarean deliveries never went into labour. Caesarean delivery was decided on before admission in 23% of women in the public sector and 64% of women in the private sector.

Many Brazilian obstetricians may believe that a caesarean section is actually safer for the newborn and more comfortable than a vaginal delivery for most women. Alternatively, doctors may not have the opportunity or skills needed to elicit their patients' preferences and simply assume that their private patients would prefer a caesarean section, suggest the authors.

"While we do not have evidence to support any of these interpretations, we are concerned that the rates of caesarean section in the private sector are above any accepted standard and are inconsistent with women's preferences," say the authors.

"We hope that our results will encourage change in Brazil and counteract the inclination to interpret high or rising rates of caesarean section elsewhere as evidence of demand for surgical delivery," they conclude.

Women and professionals should be encouraged to consider vaginal birth positively, write Richard Johanson and Mary Newburn in an accompanying editorial. New approaches that examine choice and control need to be examined, particularly in a climate where some women are choosing interventions, they conclude.
-end-


BMJ

Related Caesarean Section Articles from Brightsurf:

Risk of childhood asthma by caesarean section is mediated through the early gut microbiome
New study highlights long-term perturbations of the early gut microbiome as a possible mechanism for the observed association between caesarean section and increased risk of developing asthma.

During COVID-19 first wave, the proportion of caesarean section deliveries done under
New research from north-west England published in Anaesthesia (a journal of the Association of Anaesthetists) shows that during the first wave of COVID-19, the proportion of caesarean section deliveries carried out under general anaesthesia approximately halved, from 7.7% to 3.7%.

Caesarean birth, prolonged labour influence infant gut bacteria, risk of childhood obesity
Events at birth may affect the microbes living in a baby's gut during the first few months of life, leading to a higher risk of childhood obesity and allergies, according to a new study published in the journal Gastroenterology.

Fecal transplantation can restore the gut microbiota of C-section babies
Birth by Cesarean section is detrimental to normal gut microbiota development.

Women who deliver by C-section are less likely to conceive subsequent children
Women who deliver their first child by cesarean section (C-section) are less likely to conceive a second child than those who deliver vaginally, despite being just as likely to plan a subsequent pregnancy, according to Penn State College of Medicine researchers.

Caesarean birth has little impact on children developing allergies
A caesarean birth had little impact on whether a child would go onto develop allergies, a new study has shown.

Different views on vaginal birth after previous caesarean section (VBAC)
There is considerable variations in different countries┬┤ health care systems and professionals in the views on vaginal birth after previous caesarean section (VBAC), according to a European study.

Outcomes of birth options after a previous cesarean section
A large cohort study of women who have had one or more previous cesarean sections suggests that attempting a vaginal birth in a subsequent pregnancy is associated with higher health risks to both the mother and the infant than electing for another cesarean.

Death rates from cesarean section far higher in developing countries
Cesarean sections are disproportionately threatening the lives of women and babies in low and middle-income countries (LMIC), according to a study led by Queen Mary University of London.

Altered microbiome after caesarean section impacts baby's immune system
Together with colleagues from Sweden and Luxembourg, scientists from the Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB) of the University of Luxembourg have observed that, during a natural vaginal birth, specific bacteria from the mother's gut are passed on to the baby and stimulate the baby's immune responses.

Read More: Caesarean Section News and Caesarean Section Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.