Nav: Home

How much attention do drivers need to pay?

November 18, 2016

If it were possible to determine exactly what constitutes inattention while driving, it might be possible to detect inattention before bad things happen. That's critically important in light of advances in automated transportation and perhaps one of the potential outcomes of a new theory of driver distraction from researchers at the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute. In their recent Human Factors paper, "Minimum Required Attention: A Human-Centered Approach to Driver Inattention," Katja Kircher and Christer Ahlstrom looked at the limitations of existing definitions of driver inattention and formulated MiRA, or "minimum required attention."

MiRA considers whether or not the driver - who is only one part of the larger traffic system - is maintaining situation awareness in the driving context; in other words, visually attending to and acting on the minimum amount of information from the environment necessary for safe driving. It takes into consideration human factors such as drivers' ability to adjust pace and location, balance goals such as efficiency and perceived risk, and use spare capacity (available reaction time) to attend to targets (traffic signals, pedestrians, etc.) that don't pose a risk.

Many of the 50 or so extant definitions of driver distraction suffer from hindsight bias; that is, they identify distraction after the fact. Kircher notes, "with MiRA, the idea is to define the distraction criteria beforehand. Those criteria are based on areas in the driving environment in which certain information has to be sampled [viewed] a minimum number of times for safe operation of the vehicle. For example, driving on a curvy country road at a certain speed requires a certain minimum frequency of glances ahead to stay on the road. We can then investigate whether or not the drivers fulfill these requirements. In this way, we are able to check their behavior in real time instead of having to wait for a crash."

Kircher and Ahlstrom note that although MiRA is primarily a contribution to the theoretical discussion about driver distraction, it has the potential to be put into operation. With more study, it might be possible to define prototypical driving situations and minimum information-sampling requirements, measure when and how a driver samples information, and, finally, determine whether or not a driver has fulfilled the requirements to optimize safety.

MiRA represents a new perspective on driver inattention and allows "a differentiation between issues related to the traffic system and the driver's responsibility."

As for next steps, Kircher notes, "Our goal now is to apply the theory systematically in our empirical work. Two projects on drivers' and cyclists' attention in an urban environment will provide the first opportunity to do so."
-end-
To request a copy of "Minimum Required Attention: A Human-Centered Approach to Driver Inattention" for media-reporting purposes, contact HFES Communications Director Lois Smith (lois@hfes.org, 310/394-1811). The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society is the world's largest scientific association for human factors/ergonomics professionals, with more than 4,500 members globally. HFES members include psychologists and other scientists, designers, and engineers, all of whom have a common interest in designing systems and equipment to be safe and effective for the people who operate and maintain them. "Human Factors and Ergonomics: People-Friendly Design Through Science and Engineering."

Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Related Driving Articles:

Future intent: Would you let an automated car do the driving?
Researchers have surveyed more than 2000 drivers across Australia, France and Sweden for two separate studies investigating what people think about travelling in automated cars.
When you spot 1 driving hazard, you may be missing another
When people notice one traffic hazard, they are less likely to see a simultaneous second hazard, according to new research from North Carolina State University.
Ridehailing services may be driving up traffic deaths
The arrival of ridehailing is associated with an increase of approximately 3 percent in the number of motor vehicle fatalities and fatal accidents, according to research from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
Are self-driving cars really the answer for older drivers?
New study highlights the delay and deterioration in driving when older drivers have to 'take-back' control of their vehicle in difficult conditions.
Somebody's watching you: The surveillance of self-driving cars
Picture the future. You can hop in your car or one from a ride-share, buckle up and tell the car where you want to go.
More Driving News and Driving Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...