Risk taking strongly influenced by sense of control, says UGA researcher

November 20, 2001

A sense of control is a key factor in determining whether people take risks or avoid them, says Adam Goodie, a University of Georgia assistant professor of psychology. In a series of experiments, he found that participants were more willing to take risks when they felt they could control the outcome of a situation - even if they overestimated their likelihood of success. Goodie presented the research Monday at the annual meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, held in Orlando.

"People are really willing to take risks when they're highly confident in their own knowledge, even though it's a bad idea," says Goodie.

Goodie's experiments build on a body of research indicating that people are often overconfident about their knowledge. He asked participants to answer trivia questions and rate their level of confidence for each answer. Participants often specified a higher rate of confidence than was warranted; when they estimated a 99 percent rate of confidence, their rate of answering correctly was about 95 percent.

Goodie added a new element to the research: he used a point system to offer participants bets based on their confidence level. With a high confidence level, participants were offered a bet that gave a small reward (100 points) for each correct answer but a large penalty (9,900 points) for each incorrect answer. With a low confidence level, participants were offered what Goodie calls "a more gentle bet": a small reward (100 points) for each correct answer and a slightly larger penalty (104 points) for each incorrect answer.

Over the long run, the riskier payoffs when confidence is high make them a worse bet than the more gentle bets when confidence is low. Despite the odds, Goodie found that participants were far more willing to risk a large penalty by betting when they rated their confidence high. They were less willing to bet when their confidence was low, even though the prospects for winning over the long run were better.These results conflict with earlier findings that indicated people rejected the odds of the high confidence bet when it was based on a random event - the flipping of a coin, for example.

"When people are called to gamble on a random event, where there's a very large probability of something small but good happening and a very low probability of something big and bad happening, they don't want to do it," Goodie says. "If it's something they have control over, like their own knowledge of the world, then they insist on doing it. That has significance for all sorts of decisions we make in our lives."

The most obvious example is the debate over airline travel since the events of Sept. 11, Goodie says.

"People aren't afraid of driving, but they're afraid of flying even though air travel is statistically much safer per mile traveled," he says. "But people feel safer if they're driving because they have control over the sources of risk and uncertainty."
-end-


University of Georgia

Related Decision Making Articles from Brightsurf:

Knowing the model you can trust - the key to better decision-making
As much of Europe is engulfed by a second wave of Covid-19, and track and trace struggles to meet demand, modelling support tools are being increasingly used by policymakers to make key decisions.

Happy endings trip up the brain's decision-making
The brain keeps track of the value of an experience as well as how it unfolds over time; overemphasizing the ending may trigger poor decision-making, according to new research published in JNeurosci.

Automatic decision-making prevents us harming others - new study
The processes our brains use to avoid harming other people are automatic and reflexive - and quite different from those used when avoiding harm to ourselves, according to new research.

Mapping the decision-making pathways in the brain
Scientists at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST) have identified a new area of the brain that could be involved in cost-benefit decision-making.

How the brain's internal states affect decision-making
By recording the activity of separate populations of neurons simultaneously, researchers have gained an unprecedented insight into how the 'waxing and waning' of our mental state influences the decisions we make.

Motherhood overrides the brain's decision-making
Motherhood takes over the brain's decision-making regions to prioritize caring for offspring, according to new research in rats published in eNeuro.

Get it over with, or procrastinate? New research explores our decision-making process
New research from the UBC Sauder School of Business may have figured out why.

Illuminating interactions between decision-making and the environment
Employing a game theory model, University of Pennsylvania researchers demonstrate how strategic decisions influence the environment in which those decisions are made, alterations which in turn influence strategy.

Lung cancer screening decision aid delivered through tobacco quitlines improves informed decision-making
Researchers from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center have shown that a decision aid delivered through tobacco quitlines effectively reaches a screening-eligible population and results in informed decisions about lung cancer screening.

A molecular map of the brain's decision-making area
Researchers at Karolinska Institutet have come one step closer toward understanding how the part of our brain that is central for decision-making and the development of addiction is organized on a molecular level.

Read More: Decision Making News and Decision Making Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.