Study: 3 percent of N.C. drivers on cell phones at any given time

November 22, 2001

CHAPEL HILL - Overall, only 3.1 percent of North Carolinians are talking on cell phones at any given time while driving, a surprising new University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill study shows.

The prevalence rate was higher in the Piedmont -- 4.1 percent -- than in the mountains, which showed 2.2 percent of drivers using the devices, and in the coastal plain, which had 1.5 percent, researchers found.

"People we've discussed these numbers with have been surprised," said Dr. Donald W. Reinfurt, deputy director of UNC's Highway Safety Research Center. "Almost everybody thinks the rate is much higher, and a while back a local television reporter guessed 50 percent.

" It's fair to assume, however, that as more people get phones, the higher the percentage will be of people using them while driving. What is absolutely clear is that more and more crashes will involve cell phones."

Reinfurt and colleagues conducted the study with support from the N.C. Governor's Highway Safety Program and the cooperation of Col. Richard Holden, commander of the N.C. State Highway Patrol.

Traffic monitors observed drivers during daylight and noted if they were talking on cell phones at 85 sites across the state. In total, they observed for an hour-and-a-half at each site and saw more than 25,300 drivers, 14,059 of whom were stopped at intersections and 11,286 of whom were moving. Among moving drivers, 352 -- or 3.1 percent -- were chatting on the phone.

"Drivers who were using a cell phone while stopped at intersections were more likely to be driving without a front seat passenger, driving a sport utility vehicle, younger, white and using seat belts," Reinfurt said. "Analysis of accident reports from three N.C. Highway Patrol areas suggest that about one in 600 crashes appeared to involve use of a cell phone while driving, but we believe that may be a serious underestimate."

A computer search of all N.C. crash report narratives between Jan. 1, 1996, and Aug. 31, 2000, showed exponential growth in the frequency with which cell phone use was mentioned -- from 22 in 1996 to 231 for the first eight months of 2000, he said.

Cell phone use in cars increased somewhat during the average day from 2.7 percent in the morning to 3.5 percent in late afternoon, researchers found.

The UNC investigation also involved reviewing epidemiological studies of driving and cell phone use, case analyses of phone-related crashes and driver performance studies.

"It's also absolutely clear from the research literature that talking on a cell phone while driving does elevate the risk of a crash," Reinfurt said. "Using cell phones slows reaction times and degrades drivers' tracking abilities."

The overall 3.1 percent N.C. figure is consistent with a recent National Highway Transportation Safety Administration study showing 3 percent of drivers nationally talking on cell phones at any given time, Reinfurt said. That translates into 500,000 U.S. drivers.

"Because people usually won't admit to officers that they were talking on phones at the time of their accidents, studies analyzing risk are notoriously difficult to do well, and it is far from clear just how much cell phones increase the risk of crashes," he said. "We are a long way from solving this data problem."

The risk now posed by cell phones will undoubtedly grow as cars and other vehicles increasingly come equipped with other distracting electronic devices such as information and satellite guidance systems and even fax machines, Reinfurt said.

Other elements of the UNC study included reporting on recent legislative activities regarding cell phone use while driving, pilot-testing a supplemental data form for highway patrol officers to record phone-related crashes and analyzing police report narratives indicating that cell phones were a factor in certain crashes.

In 2001, 144 phone-related bills have been considered in 44 state legislatures, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. In New York, for example, beginning Nov. 1, drivers were not allowed to use hand-held mobile phones except in emergencies. Two similar N.C. bills died in committee.

UNC's Dr. Jane Stutts is in the middle of a major study for the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety of all forms of distractions to drivers, including children, radios, food and beverage consumption and occurrences outside the vehicles.

The first part of that study, released in May, showed cell phones to be just one of numerous non-driving activities that can lead to accidents.
-end-
Note: Reinfurt can be reached at 919-962-8719 or donald_reinfurt@unc.edu for a copy of his report.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Related Cell Phone Articles from Brightsurf:

Cell phone location used to estimate COVID-19 growth rates
Cell phone location data shows that in counties where activity declined at workplaces and increased at home, coronavirus infection rates were lower.

Study: Anonymized cell phone location data can help monitor COVID-19 growth rates
In a new study published in JAMA Internal Medicine, researchers from Mount Auburn Hospital and the University of Pennsylvania analyzed anonymous, county-level cell phone location data and incidence of COVID-19.

To make a good impression, leave cell phone alone during work meetings
New hires especially should keep their cell phones stashed away during business meetings, a new study strongly implies.

Flat-panel technology could transform antennas, wireless and cell phone communications
Researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory are reinventing the mirror, at least for microwaves, potentially replacing the familiar 3-D dishes and microwave horns we see on rooftops and cell towers with flat panels that are compact, versatile, and better adapted for modern communication technologies.

Cell phone injuries
Cell phones are mainstays of daily life. This observational study analyzed 20 years of data on people who went to emergency departments with head and neck injuries from cell phone use to estimate the number of injuries, learn what types of injuries there were, and understand how the injuries occurred, such as from distracted driving or walking.

Cell phone-based microscope leads to possible strategy for treating river blindness
River blindness, or onchocerciasis, is a disease caused by a parasitic worm (Onchocerca volvulus) found primarily in Africa.

Cell phone data coupled with sewage testing show drug use patterns
The drugs people inhale, inject or ingest ultimately end up in some form down the toilet.

Cell phone use and distracted driving begins in the mind
Even simple cell phone conversations can cause distracted driving. Researchers have found listening on the phone while driving creates a lag in the mind to extract itself from one object before fixing attention on another object.

What motivates parents to protect children from cell phone addiction?
A new study examined the role parental mediation can play in protecting children from the potential negative effects of smartphone use, comparing the perceived risk and different types of mediation and parenting styles.

Catching the IMSI-catchers: SeaGlass brings transparency to cell phone surveillance
University of Washington security researchers have developed a new system called SeaGlass to detect anomalies in the cellular landscape that can indicate where and when IMSI-catchers, cell-site simulators and other devices used in cell phone surveillance are present.

Read More: Cell Phone News and Cell Phone Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.