Family stories show immigrants are not all melting in that pot

November 22, 2005

Published in the latest issue of Family Process, the study confirms that among the newest immigrants, transnationalism is replacing the "melting pot" dynamic of the United States. The study, conducted by a third-generation American Fordham University professor, whose grandparents came from Sicily, and three "transnational" undergraduate students whose parents came, respectively, from Cuba, Greece and Russia, describes how family stories told by new immigrants and their American-born children help retain affiliation with a country other than the United State, reinforcing this dual identity.

"Families have always told stories, but for those who work professionally with families, family stories seem to have become the DNA of family life," the authors state. Across cultures, the stories told share certain motifs including celebrating and idealizing the country of origin/ethnic group, denigrating past and present "enemies" of the country, and sharing detailed knowledge of the country.

American-born children of immigrant families have, in the past, been intensely assimilationist, and their family stories often reflected the ideology of "the Melting Pot." American-born children of the newer immigrants are more transnational, more likely to be proudly bilingual, and more likely to maintain ties with the family's country of origin themselves. After interviewing twenty men and women who were born in, or whose parents were born in, countries from around the globe, the authors note this development and theorize that is supported by the culture of the United States, which is more accepting than ever of cultural pluralism.

The December issue of Family Process includes a special section on transnationalism and family stories. Along with the article by Stone, Gomez, and Lipnitsky there is the theoretical and clinical commentaries of Celia Falicov, Emotional Transnationalism and Family Identities, and Janine Roberts, Migrating Across Literature, Stories, and Family Therapy. PDFs of all articles in this issue are available to the media. Media wishing to receive PDFs please contact .

Elizabeth Stone is a professor of English, Communication & Media Studies at Fordham University. She teaches the literature course, "New Wave Immigrant Literature," in which she met her co-authors and has published more than 300 articles for newspapers and magazines. Dr. Stone is available for media questions and interviews.

Erica Gomez, who co-authored this paper as an undergraduate, received her B.A. from Fordham College at Lincoln Center in May 2004, and is now earning a law degree at Fordham Law School. She is the daughter of two Cuban émigrés.

Despina Hotoglou, who co-authored this paper as an undergraduate, received her B.S. from Fordham College at Lincoln Center in May 2004. Her father was born in Greece; her mother, also born in Greece, spent part of her childhood in Australia before returning to Greece, later emigrating to the United States.

Jane Y. Lipnitsky, who co-authored this paper as an undergraduate received her B.A. from Fordham College at Lincoln Cemter in May 2004. She is a Russian Jew whose family left the Soviet Union when she was seven.
Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems. It is published on behalf of the Family Process Institute.

Blackwell Publishing is the world's leading society publisher, partnering with more than 600 academic and professional societies. Blackwell publishes over 750 journals annually and, to date, has published close to 6,000 text and reference books, across a wide range of academic, medical, and professional subjects.

Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Related Immigrants Articles from Brightsurf:

Immigrants who naturalize outearn their peers
Looking at municipalities in Switzerland where citizenship applications were put to a popular vote, researchers identified immigrants who narrowly won or lost and tracked their earnings over the next several decades.

US-born residents more than 5 times likely to use prescription opioids than new immigrants
The longer immigrants live in the United States, the more likely they are to use prescription opioids -- a fact that contradicts popular views linking wealth and health, and suggests that American culture is uniquely favorable toward prescribing opioids.

Length of time in US associated with immigrants' opioid use
The more time first-generation immigrants spend in the United States the more likely it appears they will use prescription opioids.

Undocumented immigrants' transplant survival rates on par with US citizens'
Unauthorized immigrants who receive liver transplants in the United States have comparable three-year survival rates to US citizens, according to a study by researchers at UC San Francisco.

Immigrants who committed felonies less likely than nonimmigrants to commit another felony
A new study compared recidivism rates of foreign-born and native-born individuals formerly incarcerated for felonies and released from prisons in Florida.

Uncovering the roots of discrimination toward immigrants
Immigrants are often encouraged to assimilate into their new culture as a way of reducing conflict with their host societies, to appear less threatening to the culture and national identity of the host population.

Immigrants: citizens' acceptance depends on questions asked
How many immigrants per year should Switzerland be prepared to welcome?

How societal attitudes, political rhetoric affect immigrants' health
For immigrants to the United States, the current political climate, and debates over issues such as a border wall, become part of the environment that influences their health, according to a new University of Washington study.

UK prejudice against immigrants amongst lowest in Europe
A new study published in Frontiers in Sociology challenges prevailing attitudes on Brexit, the nature of prejudice, and the social impact of modernization.

Research shows biases against immigrants with non-anglicized names
Using variations of the 'trolley-dilemma' where people choose who to save or not save others in a hypothetical situation, social psychologists show that for certain groups, under certain conditions in a hypothetical scenario, having an anglicized name means you're more likely to be saved than if you kept your original Asian or Arab name.

Read More: Immigrants News and Immigrants Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to