Nav: Home

Early human ancestors not to blame for extinctions of giant African mammals

November 22, 2018

Africa harbors the greatest diversity of large-bodied mammals today, though this was not always the case. As recently as 50,000 years ago, virtually all of Earth's continents were populated with a great variety of species rivaling Africa's present-day diversity. While North America and Eurasia hosted Ice Age icons like wooly mammoths and saber-toothed cats, giant kangaroos and 6,000-lb wombats roamed the Australian outback, and gorilla-sized lemurs ambled across the forest floors of Madagascar.

Unfortunately, all of these creatures disappeared during the last 50,000 years as our species - Homo sapiens - spread across the globe. Though long a source of heated debate, it is now clear that humans equipped with advanced stone tools were largely responsible for the demise of these large mammals. These extinctions occurred in virtually every region of the world except Africa, where most large mammals survived to the present-day.

For the last 50 years, the common explanation for this anomaly has been to invoke ancient hominin impacts in Africa. That is, because human ancestors have been present in Africa for nearly seven million years - much longer than any other region of the world - they likely caused extinctions earlier in Africa than anywhere else.

A team of researchers, including postdoctoral scientist John Rowan, overturns decades of thinking on ancient hominin impacts in Africa. Rowan is with the University of Massachusetts Amherst and a 2018 doctoral graduate of Arizona State University.

The team's research, published this week in Science, shows that early hominin species played little to no role in driving mammal extinctions in ancient African ecosystems.

The research team focused their analyses on the very largest mammal species, so-called megaherbivores (species over 2,000 lbs). To test for ancient hominin impacts on megaherbivore diversity, the researchers analyzed a seven-million-year-record of extinctions in Africa and compared it to milestones in human evolution that have been previously implicated in these extinctions. This includes, for example, the earliest stone tools and mammal butchery (around 3.4 to 3.3 million years ago) and the first appearance of Homo erectus (around 1.9 million years ago), a species that made advanced stone hand-axes and is known to have consumed ample quantities of meat.

Rowan and colleagues showed that the decline of megaherbivores in Africa over the last seven million years occurred independently of any milestone in human evolution to which it might be linked. In fact, the loss of megaherbivores begins 4.6 million years ago, a time when the only known hominin is Ardipithecus, a small-brained and ape-like human ancestor that lacked stone tools and at best hunted small prey like chimpanzees do today. Going a step further, the researchers propose that most hominin species over the last 4.6 million years were unlikely to have contributed to the demise of megaherbivores, as the rate of extinction does not significantly change from Ardipithecus onwards despite the appearance of larger-brained and tool-bearing hominin species.

"If hominins were responsible for the extinction of megaherbivores, we would expect their decline to be more step-like and to track behavioral or adaptive milestones in human evolution" says Rowan. "It is instead gradual - playing out over nearly five million years - long before the appearance of any hominin remotely capable of taking down rhino- or elephant-sized prey. This suggests to our research team that widespread impacts on the large mammal species and terrestrial ecosystems might be unique to us - Homo sapiens."

As an alternative to ancient hominin impacts, the researchers argue that the decline of megaherbivores is instead related to environmental change. The main culprits of this change were falling atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and the replacement of large shrubs and trees by grasslands. They note that CO2 decline and grassland expansion are linked phenomena because tropical grasses have a greater ability to cope with low levels of atmospheric CO2 in comparison to trees. They also showed that many of the extinct megaherbivores were browsers who fed on the leaves of trees, suggesting they disappeared alongside their food sources as grasses came to dominate African savannas over the last five million years.

"Human impacts on Earth's biodiversity have been significant and sometimes catastrophic," says Rowan. "In this case, at least, our ancestors are not to blame. This is very clearly a long-term, bottom-up loss of diversity related to broader events in Earth's climate and environments over the last several million years."
-end-
This research is published in Plio-Pleistocene decline of African megaherbivores: No evidence of ancient hominin impacts. J. Tayler Faith, John Rowan, Andrew Du, Paul L. Koch. Science

Arizona State University

Related Human Evolution Articles:

Cell-autonomous immunity shaped human evolution
Every human cell harbors its own defenses against microbial invaders, relying on strategies that date back to some of the earliest events in the history of life, researchers report.
Hunter-gatherer networks accelerated human evolution
Humans began developing a complex culture as early as the Stone Age.
Ancient gut microbiomes shed light on human evolution
The microbiome of our ancestors might have been more important for human evolution than previously thought.
Environment, not evolution, might underlie some human-ape differences
Apes' abilities have been unfairly measured, throwing into doubt the assumed belief that human infants are superior to adult chimpanzees, according to a new study by leaders in the field of ape cognition.
Neandertal genes give clues to human brain evolution
A distinctive feature of modern humans is our round (globular) skulls and brains.
Dryer, less predictable environment may have spurred human evolution
Evidence of a variable but progressively drying climate coincides with a major shift in stone-tool-making abilities and the appearance of modern Homo sapiens.
Evolution of psychiatric disorders and human personality traits
How and why human-unique characteristics such as highly social behavior, languages and complex culture have evolved is a long-standing question.
What gorilla poop tells us about evolution and human health
A study of the microbiomes of wild gorillas and chimpanzees offers insights into the evolution of the human microbiome and might even have implications for human health.
Why expressive brows might have mattered in human evolution
Highly mobile eyebrows that can be used to express a wide range of subtle emotions may have played a crucial role in human survival, new research from the University of York suggests.
Interdisciplinary approach yields new insights into human evolution
The evolution of human biology should be considered part and parcel with the evolution of humanity itself, proposes Nicole Creanza, assistant professor of biological sciences.
More Human Evolution News and Human Evolution Current Events

Trending Science News

Current Coronavirus (COVID-19) News

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2020.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Listen Again: The Power Of Spaces
How do spaces shape the human experience? In what ways do our rooms, homes, and buildings give us meaning and purpose? This hour, TED speakers explore the power of the spaces we make and inhabit. Guests include architect Michael Murphy, musician David Byrne, artist Es Devlin, and architect Siamak Hariri.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#576 Science Communication in Creative Places
When you think of science communication, you might think of TED talks or museum talks or video talks, or... people giving lectures. It's a lot of people talking. But there's more to sci comm than that. This week host Bethany Brookshire talks to three people who have looked at science communication in places you might not expect it. We'll speak with Mauna Dasari, a graduate student at Notre Dame, about making mammals into a March Madness match. We'll talk with Sarah Garner, director of the Pathologists Assistant Program at Tulane University School of Medicine, who takes pathology instruction out of...
Now Playing: Radiolab

What If?
There's plenty of speculation about what Donald Trump might do in the wake of the election. Would he dispute the results if he loses? Would he simply refuse to leave office, or even try to use the military to maintain control? Last summer, Rosa Brooks got together a team of experts and political operatives from both sides of the aisle to ask a slightly different question. Rather than arguing about whether he'd do those things, they dug into what exactly would happen if he did. Part war game part choose your own adventure, Rosa's Transition Integrity Project doesn't give us any predictions, and it isn't a referendum on Trump. Instead, it's a deeply illuminating stress test on our laws, our institutions, and on the commitment to democracy written into the constitution. This episode was reported by Bethel Habte, with help from Tracie Hunte, and produced by Bethel Habte. Jeremy Bloom provided original music. Support Radiolab by becoming a member today at Radiolab.org/donate.     You can read The Transition Integrity Project's report here.