Largest health gains from cleaner electricity generation can be made in middle-income countries such as India and China

November 25, 2009

Decreasing the proportion of carbon-based electricity generation will lead to significant health benefits worldwide. Middle-income countries such as India and China would see the largest benefit, but developed nations such as the European Union (EU) states would also see health gains. The issues around electricity generation are discussed in the third paper in the Lancet Series on Health and Climate Change, written by Professor Anil Markandya, BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change, Bilbao, Spain, and colleagues.

The authors assessed the changes in particle air pollution emissions, and consequent effects on health that are likely to result from greenhouse-gas mitigation measures in the electricity generation sector in the EU, China, and India. The authors looked at the likely effect in 2030 of pursuing a path that reduces total carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 50% by 2050 globally, compared with emissions in 1990. They looked at a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario in 2030, and compared it with two mitigation strategies.

Under the estimates, the EU27 countries, India, and China would all see substantial reductions in their fossil-fuel-dependent electricity generation, along with increases in their renewable and nuclear energy compared with the BAU 2030 scenario. For example, in the EU, the most optimistic estimate would see the proportion of coal-generated electricity at 26% (compared with BAU 37%), in India it would be 49% (BAU 76%). Renewables (not including nuclear) would be 26% in the EU27 in the best-case scenario, compared to 14% BAU; and in China, renewable would make up 29% of electricity generation compared to 19% BAU.*

The authors found that, in the EU, China, and India, changes of modes of electricity generation would reduce not only carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions but also particulate air pollution and consequently mortality. The greatest effect would be in India, where electricity generation is associated with the greatest level of particulate pollution, and the smallest in the EU, where electricity production from fossil fuels is already quite clean.

The best-case scenario would, in India, avert 93,000 premature deaths in 2030 compared with BAU. In the EU, 5,000 deaths would be averted and in China the number would be 57,000. These would arise from reductions in a range of cardiorespiratory/lung cancer/acute respiratory illnesses. In monetary terms, health benefits were found to be in the range of $2 per tonne of CO2 not emitted in the EU, $7 in China, and $46 in India. By subtracting health benefits from direct costs of decarbonising electricity, only small reductions in direct costs are seen in the EU, but appreciable reductions would occur in China and India. In fact, for India, health benefit exceeds the direct costs of reducing CO2, leaving a negative net cost of $4 per tonne of CO2 not emitted.

The authors say: "This study indicates that some health benefits will result from changes in the means of electricity generation in response to a 50% CO2 reduction target by 2050. Estimates indicate savings in years of life that will be greatest in India, followed by China. If in 2030 changes were made that were consistent with the 2050 reduction targets, gains in India and China would be about 1500 and 500 life-years per million people, respectively. In the EU, the benefits are expected to be more modest, at around 100 life-years per million people in 2030."

They conclude: "We believe that we have shown clear health gains through decarbonising electricity production, and added information about the extent of such gains and how they are likely to compare, under the scenarios considered, in three regions of the world. We have also illustrated how those gains could be expressed in monetary terms to inform economic analyses. Health benefits are not usually taken into account when deciding between policies affecting electricity production, whether or not that policy considers climate change. Here, we make a case for doing so."
-end-
Professor Anil Markandya, BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change, Bilbao, Spain. T) + 34 94 4014754 / (while in UK) +44 (0)7802 414156 E) anil.markandya@bc3research.org

Professor Ben Armstrong, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK. T) +44 (0)207 927 2232 E) Ben.Armstrong@lshtm.ac.uk

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Press Office. T) +44 (0) 20 7927 2073 E) Sally.Hall@lshtm.ac.uk / Gemma.Howe@lshtm.ac.uk

For full Series paper 3, see: http://press.thelancet.com/tlhacc3.pdf

Note to editors: * see table 1, page 5 of paper 3 for full details

Lancet

Related Climate Change Articles from Brightsurf:

Are climate scientists being too cautious when linking extreme weather to climate change?
Climate science has focused on avoiding false alarms when linking extreme events to climate change.

Mysterious climate change
New research findings underline the crucial role that sea ice throughout the Southern Ocean played for atmospheric CO2 in times of rapid climate change in the past.

Mapping the path of climate change
Predicting a major transition, such as climate change, is extremely difficult, but the probabilistic framework developed by the authors is the first step in identifying the path between a shift in two environmental states.

Small change for climate change: Time to increase research funding to save the world
A new study shows that there is a huge disproportion in the level of funding for social science research into the greatest challenge in combating global warming -- how to get individuals and societies to overcome ingrained human habits to make the changes necessary to mitigate climate change.

Sub-national 'climate clubs' could offer key to combating climate change
'Climate clubs' offering membership for sub-national states, in addition to just countries, could speed up progress towards a globally harmonized climate change policy, which in turn offers a way to achieve stronger climate policies in all countries.

Review of Chinese atmospheric science research over the past 70 years: Climate and climate change
Over the past 70 years since the foundation of the People's Republic of China, Chinese scientists have made great contributions to various fields in the research of atmospheric sciences, which attracted worldwide attention.

A CERN for climate change
In a Perspective article appearing in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Tim Palmer (Oxford University), and Bjorn Stevens (Max Planck Society), critically reflect on the present state of Earth system modelling.

Fairy-wrens change breeding habits to cope with climate change
Warmer temperatures linked to climate change are having a big impact on the breeding habits of one of Australia's most recognisable bird species, according to researchers at The Australian National University (ANU).

Believing in climate change doesn't mean you are preparing for climate change, study finds
Notre Dame researchers found that although coastal homeowners may perceive a worsening of climate change-related hazards, these attitudes are largely unrelated to a homeowner's expectations of actual home damage.

Older forests resist change -- climate change, that is
Older forests in eastern North America are less vulnerable to climate change than younger forests, particularly for carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity, new research finds.

Read More: Climate Change News and Climate Change Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.