Study finds factors impeding bystander CPR

November 26, 2003

A study in the December 2003 issue of Annals of Emergency Medicine identifies specific factors that may impede dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and could potentially be corrected through dispatcher training, variation in CPR technique, or community education. (Factors Impeding Dispatcher-Assisted Telephone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, p. 731)

In this study of 404 sudden cardiac arrest victims, 25 percent received bystander CPR without dispatcher assistance, 33 percent received CPR from a bystander receiving instruction over the phone from a dispatcher; and 41 percent did not receive bystander CPR before Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrival.

"The fact that one-third of victims received dispatcher-assisted CPR is a rate fairly consistent with studies done in our community and is testimony to the proficient skill of the dispatchers and the community's CPR awareness and training," said Thomas D. Rea, MD, MPH, from the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle. "However, our study was looking for what may have impeded bystanders from performing dispatcher-assisted CPR in cases where CPR was not performed."

The study found almost one-half of sudden cardiac arrest victims did not receive CPR before EMS arrival. Among the cases potentially eligible for telephone-assisted CPR, the dispatcher most commonly did not offer instruction because the victim was reported to have signs of life.

"Review of these cases suggests dispatchers should continue to question bystanders about signs of life, with special attention to identifying agonal respiration, which are irregular respirations and are a sign of sudden cardiac arrest, though they may be mistaken for the patient breathing on his own," said Dr. Rea.

Other reasons CPR was not performed included combinations of the bystander's own physical limitation or the victim's location or position (e.g., sitting in a chair), according to the study. Contrary to other investigations, this study found it uncommon for CPR to be impeded because bystanders were emotionally distressed, or were afraid of disease transmission, or potential liability.
-end-
Annals of Emergency Medicine is the peer-reviewed journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, a national medical specialty organization with nearly 23,000 members. The following highlights from the December 2003 issue are not intended to substitute for articles as sources of information. To obtain copies of the studies, contact Colleen Hughes at the phone number above or by e-mail at chughes@acep.org.

American College of Emergency Physicians

Related CPR Articles from Brightsurf:

Extra precautions during CPR due to the pandemic do not have a negative impact on survival
A U.S. medical center compared outcomes of patients in 2019 and 2020 who had in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to determine if safety precautions due to the pandemic affect patient survival.

CPR choices of dialysis patients suggest many lack context
Globally some 2 million people with failed kidneys undergo hemodialysis treatment.

Bystander CPR less likely for people living in Hispanic neighborhoods
People living in predominately Hispanic neighborhoods are less likely to receive CPR from a bystander following an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared to people living in non-Hispanic neighborhoods, researchers from Penn Medicine and the Duke University of School of Medicine reported in the journal Circulation.

Ontario physicians do not need consent to withhold CPR that they feel will not benefit patients
In August, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a malpractice lawsuit filed against two physicians who refused to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to an 88-year-old man with multiple comorbidities and multiorgan failure.

Legal risk of not performing CPR higher than providing lifesaving assistance
While some bystanders may fail to attempt CPR because they fear legal liability, the likelihood of facing litigation is higher for delaying or failing to intervene, according to preliminary research to be presented at the American Heart Association's Resuscitation Science Symposium 2019 -- Nov.

Use of emergency CPR device rising despite lack of evidence
While its use is expanding, mechanical CPR has not been tested for effectiveness by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA).

University of Minnesota researchers find new ways to improve CPR
An international research consortium, which included faculty members from the University of Minnesota Medical School, was able to identify what is likely an optimal combination of chest compression frequency and depth when performing CPR.

Bystander CPR less likely for black kids in poorest neighborhoods
African-American kids from the most disadvantaged areas are about half as likely to receive emergency bystander CPR following an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest than white children in disadvantaged or more prosperous neighborhoods.

Compression-only CPR increases survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
In a Swedish study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, bystander CPR rates nearly doubled and compression-only, or Hands-Only CPR, rates increased six-fold over the 18-year review.

Two novel studies explore why women receive less CPR from bystanders
Separate studies explore why women are less likely to receive bystander CPR.

Read More: CPR News and CPR Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.