LSE study calls for improved mental health support

November 26, 2019

A government scheme to support the mental health of people affected by terrorist attacks needs to provide a better system of immediate psychological help, according to research led by the Care Policy and Evaluation Centre at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).

The study, funded through the NIHR Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, explored the effectiveness of the Department of Health and Social Care's 'Screen and Treat Programme', which was set up to identify and refer people to mental health services following terrorist attacks in Tunisia, Paris and Brussels in 2015 and 2016.

Dr Eva Cyhlarova, who carried out the research, said that: "Terrorist attacks have wide-reaching consequences. Mental health needs are common for those affected. We wanted to see how effective the Screen and Treat programme was in identifying and referring people to mental health services and to understand how the agencies involved worked together. Our evaluation showed that the programme worked well in many ways, but it was available too late."

Most of the 77 people who responded to the study questionnaire said that the attacks had a major impact on their lives, according to the findings, published in the Journal of Health Services Research & Policy.

Many people reported anxiety, depression, difficulty going out or travelling, sleep problems, panic attacks, flashbacks and hyper-vigilance. A third had reduced their working hours and a similar proportion had taken sick leave.

Of those interviewed, two-thirds sought help from their GP before being contacted by the Screen and Treat programme (which was available only about a year after the first of the terrorist attacks). Almost all thought that their GP had not been helpful in dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or referring to appropriate care. Interviewees reported that they used help offered by organisations external to National Health Service (NHS), with mixed experiences.

The study found that the Screen and Treat programme was valuable but identified several areas for improvement which could inform agencies' future planning responses. One recommendation is that there is a system to provide immediate psychological help after a terrorist attack. Although people who accessed support through the programme were generally satisfied with their treatment, most people thought it should have been available sooner.

Dr Cyhlarova also interviewed people from a range of agencies who organised and delivered the programme to understand how organisations work together as part of the response.

Professionals who worked in the planning and set-up of the programme understood the delays, with one respondent saying: 'We were slow off the mark in terms of contacting people...people said they could have done with that six months earlier.' All professionals who were interviewed as part of the study felt that the delay in setting up the programme limited its effectiveness. Waiting times for treatment also varied from no delay to a few months. One person who received treatment said: 'There was a delay in getting to the right person. I could have been somewhere else by now.'

The study found that the main reasons for slow responses were funding and data-sharing issues. Several professionals felt the service should be built into the NHS and involve local services (including GPs) rather than being managed from central government.

Professor Martin Knapp, who led the research, commented: "In future, evaluations should be embedded in the response to major incidents, with the aim of reaching the entire population of potentially affected individuals. Better understanding of people's responses to this type of trauma over time in wider contexts (for example group contexts) would help identify other factors important for resilience and recovery to be incorporated in future responses."
-end-
Notes to editors

Responding to the mental health consequences of the 2015-2016 terrorist attacks in Tunisia, Paris and Brussels: implementation and treatment experiences in the United Kingdom is by Eva Cyhlarova, Martin Knapp and Nicholas Mays.

To interview the authors, please contact Joanna Bale, Senior Media Relations Manager, LSE: j.m.bale@lse.ac.uk or 020 7955 7440.

The Screen and Treat evaluation was led by Professor Martin Knapp and Dr Eva Cyhlarova at the Care Policy and Evaluation Centre at LSE. It was funded through the NIHR Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, led by Professor Nicholas Mays at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, Department of Health and Social Care or its affiliated bodies.

CPEC

The Care Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC) is a leading international research centre carrying out world-class research in the areas of long-term care (social care), mental health, developmental disabilities, and other health issues - across the life course - to inform and influence policy, practice, and theory globally. Until June 2019, the Centre was named the Personal Social Services Research Unit at the LSE.

NIHR

The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is the nation's largest funder of health and care research. The NIHR:The NIHR was established in 2006 to improve the health and wealth of the nation through research, and is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care. In addition to its national role, the NIHR supports applied health research for the direct and primary benefit of people in low- and middle-income countries, using UK aid from the UK government.

This work uses data provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support and would not have been possible without access to this data. The NIHR recognises and values the role of patient data, securely accessed and stored, both in underpinning and leading to improvements in research and care. http://www.nihr.ac.uk/patientdata

SAGE

Related Mental Health Articles from Brightsurf:

Mental health strained by disaster
A new study found that suicide rates increase during all types of disasters -- including severe storms, floods, hurricanes and ice storms -- with the largest overall increase occurring two years after a disaster.

The mental health impact of pandemics for front line health care staff
New research shows the impact that pandemics have on the mental health of front-line health care staff.

World Mental Health Day -- CACTUS releases report of largest researcher mental health survey
On the occasion of 'World Mental Health Day' 2020, CACTUS, a global scientific communications company, has released a global survey on mental health, wellbeing and fulfilment in academia.

Mental illness, mental health care use among police officers
A survey study of Texas police officers examines how common mental illness and mental health care use are in a large urban department.

COVID-19 outbreak and mental health
The use of online platforms to guide effective consumption of information, facilitate social support and continue mental health care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic is discussed in this Viewpoint.

COVID-19 may have consequences for mental health
The COVID-19 pandemic appears to be adversely affecting mental health among hospitalised patients, the healthcare professionals treating them and the general population.

Mental health outcomes among health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic in Italy
Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety and insomnia among health care workers in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic are reported in this observational study.

Mental ill health 'substantial health concern' among police, finds international study
Mental health issues among police officers are a 'substantial health concern,' with around 1 in 4 potentially drinking at hazardous levels and around 1 in 7 meeting the criteria for post traumatic stress disorder and depression, finds a pooled data analysis of the available international evidence, published online in Occupational & Environmental Medicine.

Examining health insurance nondiscrimination policies with mental health among gender minority individuals
A large private health insurance database was used to examine the association between between health insurance nondiscrimination policies and mental health outcomes for gender minority individuals.

Mental health care for adolescents
Researchers examined changes over time in the kinds of mental health problems for which adolescents in the United States received care and where they got that care in this survey study with findings that should be interpreted within the context of several limitations including self-reported information.

Read More: Mental Health News and Mental Health Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.