Study suggests measurable impact of colorectal cancer screening program

November 30, 2017

A new study suggests that an American Cancer Society (ACS) program has been effective in promoting improvements in colorectal cancer screening rates in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). The study appears early online in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, and the authors say it has implications for broader public health efforts to increase cancer prevention and screening.

In 2013, ACS initiated the Community Health Advocates Implementing Nationwide Grants for Empowerment and Equity (CHANGE) grant program, which was designed to reduce breast and colorectal cancer screening disparities by building community capacity to implement evidence-based interventions proven to increase cancer screening rates. Funding is awarded to FQHC partners, with technical assistance provided by ACS field staff.

Funded FQHCs were required to implement at least one provider-oriented strategy (provider assessment and feedback or provider reminder/recall systems) and at least one client-oriented strategy (education, client reminders, or navigation). Most grantees (88.4%) implemented three to five intervention strategies throughout their funding period.

Investigators compared screening rates of FQHCs funded by CHANGE grants to those of matched controls. At the start of the study period, colorectal cancer screening rates were low across the board, with funded FQHCs lagging nonfunded FQHCs (26.4% vs 30.4%).

In the first year (2013-2014), funded FQHCs increased their CRC screening rates significantly more than nonfunded FQHCs. Funded FQHCs increased by 8.7% (from 26.4% to 35.1%) while nonfunded FQHCs increased by 2.7% (from 28.5% to 31.2%). Across the three years, increases were 12.7% (from 26.4% to 39.1%) and 9.0% (from 28.5% to 37.5%), respectively. The difference in change rates between groups across the 3 years was not significant.

"Even in the absence of the ACS grant funds, many FQHCs increased their CRC screening rates substantially during the 3-year period," write the authors. "The 80% by 2018 CRC campaign is a national initiative that serves as a catalyst for concentrated focus on CRC screening and may have contributed to an overall increase in CRC screening rates."

The authors write: "Funding that results in targeted, intensive efforts supported by technical assistance and accountability for data and reporting, can result in improved system policies and practices that, in turn, can increase screening rates among uninsured and underserved populations."
-end-
Article: Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers, Am J Prev Med 2017; DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.007.

American Cancer Society

Related Funding Articles from Brightsurf:

NIH funding for cardiac arrest research low compared to funding for other leading causes of death, disability
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) invests less money in cardiac arrest research compared to other leading causes of death and disability in the United States, according to preliminary research to be presented at the American Heart Association's Resuscitation Science Symposium 2019 -- Nov.

5 cool technologies your tax dollars are funding
The latest brief video from NIBIB puts a spotlight on exciting technologies developed at labs around the country funded by the institute.

Women scientists get less federal funding than men
First-time women principalĀ investigator scientists received considerably less funding from the National Institutes of Health compared to first-time male principalĀ investigators, even at top research institutions.

Foundation funding changes international reporting
Funding by private foundations is inadvertently changing the international journalism it supports, according to a new study led by the University of East Anglia (UEA).

Pediatric physician-scientists struggle for funding
A new, multicenter study that included Washington University School of Medicine in St.

Funding for new treatments for malnourished children
A consortium of researchers including groups from Plymouth University, University College London and Queen Mary University of London have received funding from the Medical Research Council-led Foundation Award with support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council to assess new ways to help severely malnourished children in Zambia and Zimbabwe.

Major ALS research funding announced
Researchers at the Montreal Neurological Institute of McGill University who play key roles in uncovering the mechanisms underlying ALS will share in $3.9 million in research funding, part of $4.5 million announced on Nov.

'Brainprint' researchers get $900K in funding
The National Science Foundation has awarded $900,000 in grant funding to researchers at Binghamton University, State University of New York to continue investigations into the next-generation of brain biometric technology.

USDA-NIFA announces up to $8.6 million in available funding
The US Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and Agriculture today announced up to $8.6 million in available funding to assist low-income individuals and communities in developing local and self-reliant food systems.

iDiv gets additional millions for new funding period
The German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig has successfully applied for further funding through the German Research Foundation.

Read More: Funding News and Funding Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.