Nav: Home

New research helps to explain how temperature shifts the circadian clock

December 01, 2015

For many living things, a roughly 24-hour internal clock governs the rhythms of life -- everything from sleep in animals, to leaf opening in plants and reproduction in bread mold. Scientists have come to understand much about this internal time-keeping system, but one important aspect, its complex response to temperature, remains enigmatic.

The reason is that while warming and cooling cause the clock to shift forward or backward, they cannot shorten or lengthen its 24-hour cycle. New research, published Nov. 2, 2015 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, explores how this is possible.

"Our research suggests an explanation: The internal gears within the clock -- the cyclical activity of genes and concentrations of proteins -- do not change with temperature, so the length of the cycle stays the same," says senior author Eric Siggia, Viola Ward Brinning and Elbert Calhoun Brinning Professor at Rockefeller's Center for Studies in Physics and Biology.

"Meanwhile, the core mechanisms of the clock appear to be linked to external pathways that are sensitive to temperature. This external coupling can cue the clock to skip ahead or backward," Siggia says.

This study is the result of a collaboration between Siggia's lab and Michael W. Young's Laboratory of Genetics. It builds upon growing evidence calling into question a model that has, for decades, been used to explain temperature-induced shifts.

A new explanation

In recent decades, researchers have uncovered the genetic processes that drive the clocks of many different species. In fruit flies, for example, a pair of proteins called Period and Timeless are transcribed from their genes, and after a series of steps, eventually repress their own production. This cycle takes approximately 24 hours, regardless of the temperature at which an organism lives. This makes the circadian clock an oddity, since temperature alters the rate at which most biological processes take place.

For decades, the dominant explanation for 24-hour period's independence from temperature, a phenomenon known as temperature compensation, relied on the heat-sensitivity of the chemical reactions that run the time-keeping cycle. According to this theory, the effects of temperature on the many chemical reactions in the circadian cycle cancel each other out, leaving the period unaffected by changes in temperature.

But increasingly, studies have suggested something else is going on. For example, a 2010 study showed that in fruit flies whose protective heat and stress response has been inhibited, the clock hardly shifts with temperature changes. Since the conventional model predicts that everything is temperature sensitive, no single pathway should be this influential.

Previous work in Siggia's lab suggested an alternative explanation. The investigators used computational tools to simulate the evolution of gene networks, including a model of the circadian clock. Their findings suggested that temperature-induced shifts of the clock involve genetic pathways separate from the molecular cycles at the core of the clock, but linked to them, and that the core clock is actually insensitive to temperature.

Proportional at different temperatures

The recent study's lead author, Philip Kidd, a postdoc in the labs of Siggia and Young, set out to test this hypothesis. Using a conceptual model and molecular experiments in flies, he examined how the oscillations of individual components of the clock, such as concentrations of the protein Timeless, changed with temperature.

"If our prediction is correct, and the core mechanism of the clock does not respond to temperature, then the fluctuations in a particular component at different temperatures should remain proportional to one another--that is, we should be able to rescale them so they align," Kidd says. "And when we examined the transcription rate of Timeless, as well as its subsequent levels at three temperatures, that was precisely what we found."

Meanwhile, in a fly with a mutation that allows the length of the clock's period to change with temperature, the curves describing fluctuations in Timeless at the three temperatures shifted around and changed shapes, and were no longer proportional, confirming the premise of Siggia's earlier model.

"The mechanism by which the clock can partially ignore temperature has remained a key problem for those of us seeking to understand how it functions. Our work, and that of others, points to a general system that could explain this mystery and lead to a comprehensive understanding of these clocks," says Young, a study co-author and the Richard and Jeanne Fisher Professor.

Rockefeller University

Related Circadian Clock Articles:

How circadian clocks communicate with each other
Multiple biological clocks control the daily rhythms of physiology and behavior in animals and humans.
Circadian clock changes can alter body's response to diet
Changing the circadian clock in mouse liver can alter how the body responds to diet and also change the microbes living in the digestive track.
Red and violet light reset the circadian clock in algae via novel pathway
A Nagoya University-led team uncovered a pathway in the alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii that resets its circadian clock on exposure to red or violet light.
TSRI researchers show how circadian 'clock' may influence cancer pathway
A new study led by scientists at The Scripps Research Institute describes an unexpected role for proteins involved with our daily 'circadian' clocks in influencing cancer growth.
Powering up the circadian rhythm
Salk team first to discover protein that controls the strength of body's circadian rhythms.
With a broken circadian clock, even a low-salt diet can raise resting blood pressure, promote disease
In the face of a disrupted circadian rhythm, a low-salt diet and a hormone known to constrict blood vessels have the same unhealthy result: elevated resting blood pressure and vascular disease, scientists report.
Bacteria engineered with synthetic circadian clocks
Many of the body's processes follow a natural daily rhythm or so-called circadian clock, so there are certain times of the day when a person is most alert, when the heart is most efficient, and when the body prefers sleep.
New research helps to explain how temperature shifts the circadian clock
One important aspect of the internal time-keeping system continues to perplex scientists: its complex response to temperature, which can shift the clock forward or backward, but cannot change its 24-hour period.
Circadian clock controls insulin and blood sugar in pancreas
A new Northwestern Medicine study has pinpointed thousands of genetic pathways an internal body clock takes to dictate how and when our pancreas must produce insulin and control blood sugar, findings that could eventually lead to new therapies for children and adults with diabetes.
Uncovering the secrets of sleep and circadian rhythms
Our circadian rhythms tell us when it's time to sleep and energize us at different times of the day; evidence suggests it also plays a role in the development of diseases such as cancer.

Related Circadian Clock Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Do animals grieve? Do they have language or consciousness? For a long time, scientists resisted the urge to look for human qualities in animals. This hour, TED speakers explore how that is changing. Guests include biological anthropologist Barbara King, dolphin researcher Denise Herzing, primatologist Frans de Waal, and ecologist Carl Safina.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#532 A Class Conversation
This week we take a look at the sociology of class. What factors create and impact class? How do we try and study it? How does class play out differently in different countries like the US and the UK? How does it impact the political system? We talk with Daniel Laurison, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Swarthmore College and coauthor of the book "The Class Ceiling: Why it Pays to be Privileged", about class and its impacts on people and our systems.