Review of the landscape conservation cooperatives

December 03, 2015

WASHINGTON - Because fish, wildlife, habitats, and cultural resources extend beyond political boundaries, there is a national need to develop resource management strategies across jurisdictions and sectors, says a new congressionally mandated report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCCs), initiated by the U.S. Department of the Interior in 2009 and coordinated by the department's Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), were created to address this national need and can point to many early accomplishments. Ultimately, the long-term success of this effort will depend on developing ways to measure and demonstrate benefits to its conservation partners and the nation.

At the request of Congress, FWS asked the Academies to convene a committee to evaluate the LCCs, a network of 22 regional conservation partnerships in the United States, including the Pacific and Caribbean islands, as well as parts of Canada and Mexico. Each LCC is tasked with creating a collaborative framework to develop shared conservation priorities and identify applied research needs across federal agencies, state agencies, tribes, private landholders, and other stakeholders working on conservation efforts within its region.

Individual LCCs have generated some early accomplishments, such as identifying partners, establishing governance structures and steering committees, and developing shared conservation and research priorities for use by all partners, says the report. It is too soon to expect the network as a whole to have made measurable improvements to managing fish, bird, and other wildlife populations and their habitats. In addition, the LCC network needs to improve its evaluation process to better capture the contributions made by all partners toward common objectives and to better measure and demonstrate benefits to its partners.

The report finds that LCCs are unique in that they are designed to address landscape needs at a national level for all natural and cultural resources as well as to bridge conservation research and management. Similar federal programs are more narrowly focused and the LCCs generally seek to coordinate with other programs where their interests overlap. Moving forward, the LCC network needs to strengthen coordination with other programs that have a strong interest in landscape approaches to conservation to avoid duplicative efforts and limit demands on state agency and other partners that participate in multiple programs.

The study was sponsored by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are private, nonprofit institutions that provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions related to science, technology, and medicine. They operate under an 1863 congressional charter to the National Academy of Sciences, signed by President Lincoln. For more information, visit A committee roster follows.

Jennifer Burris Olson, Media Consultant

Grace Minus, Media Assistant
Office of News and Public Information

202-334-2138; email news@nas.edu
Twitter: @theNASEM
RSS feed:

Pre-publication copies of A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives are available from the National Academies Press on the Internet at or by calling 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242. Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).


Division on Earth and Life Studies

Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources

Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate

Ocean Studies Board

Committee on the Evaluation of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Dorothy J. Merritts (chair)
Harry W. and Mary B. Huffnagle Professor of Geosciences, and
Chair, Department of Earth and Environment
Franklin and Marshall College
Lancaster, Pa.

Brenda Barrett
Director of Recreation and Conservation (retired)
Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources

F. Stuart Chapin III*
Professor Emeritus
Institute of Arctic Biology
University of Alaska

Holly D. Doremus
James H. House and Hiram H. Hurd Professor of Environmental Regulation,
Associate Dean of Faculty Development and Research, and
Co-Director, Center for Law, Energy, and the Environment
School of Law
University of California

Craig Groves
Executive Director
Science for Nature and People
The Nature Conservancy
Bozeman, Mont.

Kenneth D. Haddad
Executive Director (retired)
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

Jessica Hellmann
Institute on the Environment
University of Minnesota
St. Paul

Lynn A. Maguire
Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences
Duke University
Durham, N.C.

Philip W. Mote
Oregon Climate Change Research Institute and Oregon Climate Services
College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences
Oregon State University

John A. O'Leary
Assistant Director
Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife

Rebecca R. Rubin
President and Chief Executive Officer
Marstel-Day LLC
Fredericksburg, Va.

Dale Strickland
President and Senior Ecologist
Western EcoSystems Technologies Inc.
Cheyenne, Wyo.

Eric Toman
Associate Professor
School of Environment and Natural Resources
Ohio State University


Claudia Mengelt
Study Director

*Member, National Academy of Sciences

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Related Conservation Articles from Brightsurf:

New guide on using drones for conservation
Drones are a powerful tool for conservation - but they should only be used after careful consideration and planning, according to a new report.

Elephant genetics guide conservation
A large-scale study of African elephant genetics in Tanzania reveals the history of elephant populations, how they interact, and what areas may be critical to conserve in order to preserve genetic diversity of the species.

Measuring the true cost of conservation
BU Professor created the first high-resolution map of land value in the United states.

Environmental groups moving beyond conservation
Although non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have become powerful voices in world environmental politics, little is known of the global picture of this sector.

Hunting for the next generation of conservation stewards
Wildlife ecology students become the professionals responsible for managing the biodiversity of natural systems for species conservation.

Conservation research on lynx
Scientists at the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (Leibniz-IZW) and the Leibniz Institute for Molecular Pharmacology (Leibniz-FMP) discovered that selected anti-oxidative enzymes, especially the enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD2), may play an important role to maintain the unusual longevity of the corpus luteum in lynxes.

New 'umbrella' species would massively improve conservation
The protection of Australia's threatened species could be improved by a factor of seven, if more efficient 'umbrella' species were prioritised for protection, according to University of Queensland research.

Trashed farmland could be a conservation treasure
Low-productivity agricultural land could be transformed into millions of hectares of conservation reserve across the world, according to University of Queensland-led research.

Bats in attics might be necessary for conservation
Researchers investigate and describe the conservation importance of buildings relative to natural, alternative roosts for little brown bats in Yellowstone National Park.

Applying biodiversity conservation research in practice
One million species are threatened with extinction, many of them already in the coming decades.

Read More: Conservation News and Conservation Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to