Call for WHO elections to be more open and transparent

December 05, 2002

The fate of billions of the world's population hangs in the balance this week as 9 candidates gear up for the most important election in global health - that of the WHO's Director-General. A secret and largely unaccountable process, the election is shrouded in medieval mystery, still reflecting the post second-world war political scene rather than today's more complex, multilateral, democratic world.

A joint campaign between THE LANCET and the Rockefeller Foundation aims to instill transparency, accountability, and vigorous public debate about the election of the new Director-General of WHO. THE LANCET is this week publishing an open letter to WHO's Executive Board to highlight the most critical issues that the new WHO incumbent will face at a time when health inequalities between rich and poor nations are dramatically widening--and at a time where WHO's external failures and internal conflicts urgently need addressing. The open letter--the result of a recent meeting in Tanzania between key organisations committed to the future success of global health, including WHO itself--challenges WHO's 32-strong Executive Board to address 10 critical questions to the five shortlisted candidates who will be interviewed for the new WHO Director-General appointment in late January. Key issues posed in the letter include the future vision of WHO, how WHO should collaborate with global and country-wide organisations, the role of WHO in setting the agenda for health research, and questions about improving internal processes within the agency at a time when staff morale is at an all-time low.

In addition, the campaign seeks to elicit responses to the questions in the open letter from the nine candidates in contention--WHO's Executive Board will reduce the number of candidates to five in a secret meeting taking place on January 20, 2003. This week's Lancet Editorial comments: 'We invite all nominees for Director-General to respond to these questions in advance of the January Executive Board meeting. Candidates might welcome an opportunity to use these questions as a means to define their personal platforms for election. At present, there remains no other way for them to do so publicly. Their willingness to take part in this open debate will also signal their commitment to a transparent and accountable election process.'

An accompanying Commentary (p 1799) by Lancet Editor Richard Horton and Ariel Pablos-Mendez from the Rockefeller Foundation critically reviews WHO's recent failings in order to identify key priorities for the new Director-General. WHO is criticised for lacking leadership, "....there has been no sense of urgency in WHO's leadership, no sense that WHO must reinterpret its mandate to advocate on behalf of the world's poorest people.". Horton and Pablos-Mendez comment how Africa--with its appalling scale of humanitarian disaster, HIV/AIDS epidemic, and a severe problem with corrupt Governments in many of its countries--is a crucial yet presently neglected future priority for WHO. They also comment on the severe underfunding of WHO, suggesting that the new Director-General could move in one of two directions: to campaign for appropriate funding rather than having an over-reliance on outside donations, or--more radically--to re-address and reinvent its overall function. WHO, they argue, could be a more effective global agency if it concentrated on fewer projects by reducing the duplication of work of other agencies, such as UN AIDS in tackling the HIV pandemic.

Richard Horton and Ariel Pablos-Mendez comment: "For WHO in 2003, the right leader will be someone who is prepared to lead the global health community on behalf, first and foremost, of the world's poorest people; a person with strong public-health instincts, a demonstrable commitment to advocating global health equity, evidence of transparent and democratic management, and a history of inclusive decision making, especially concerning civil society; a leader, in other words, with the courage to redistribute WHO's budget to countries, to give staff greater autonomy, and to be prepared to upset and irritate enough governments to ensure that the new Director-General may serve only one term."

Richard Horton comments: "This election will, directly and indirectly, affect the lives of every person on the planet-and yet there will be no manifestos published for debate, no formal hustings for analysis of the predicament of the world's most vulnerable people, and no forum to discuss a role that carries more influence on human life than any single presidency or Prime-ministerial position. This election demands public scrutiny and rigorous debate - and there are only 6 weeks to go."
-end-
Contact: Dr Richard Horton, c/o The Lancet Press Office, 32 Jamestown Road, London NW1 7BY, UK; T)+44-0-20-7424-4949; F) +44-0-20-7424-4912; E) pressoffice@lancet.com.

George Soule, Office of Communication, The Rockefeller Foundation, 420 Fifth Avenue, NY, NY 10018, USA; T) +1-212-85-8456; F) +1-212-852-8441; E) gsoule@rockfound.org; W) http://www.rockfound.org.

Lancet

Related Global Health Articles from Brightsurf:

The Lancet Global Health: Modelling study estimates health-care cost of COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries at US$52 billion every four weeks
New modelling research, published in The Lancet Global Health journal, estimates that it could cost low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) around US$52 billion (equivalent to US$8.60 per person) over four weeks to provide an effective health-care response to COVID-19, assuming each country's reproductive number (average number of contacts that a case infects) remained unchanged (table 2).

The Lancet Global Health: Estimates suggest one in five people worldwide have an underlying health condition that could increase their risk of severe COVID-19 if infected
An estimated 1.7 billion people, 22% of the world population, have at least one underlying health condition that could increase their risk of severe COVID-19 if infected, according to a modelling study that uses data from 188 countries, published in The Lancet Global Health journal.

Anxiety needs global health attention
Identifying anxiety in those with depression could be key to developing successful programmes for tackling mental health problems in low and middle income countries (LMICs), according to a new study.

The Lancet: Big Sugar and neglect by global health community fuel oral health crisis
Oral health has been isolated from traditional healthcare and health policy for too long, despite the major global public health burden of oral diseases, according to a Lancet Series on Oral Health, published today in The Lancet.

The Lancet Global Health: Restrictive migration policies contribute to poor migrant health in high-income countries
Restrictive entry and integration policies are having an adverse effect on the health of migrants in high-income countries, according to the most comprehensive assessment of the impact of general migration policies on migrant health, published in The Lancet Global Health journal.

The Lancet Global Health: Improved access to care not sufficient to improve health, as epidemic of poor quality care revealed
Of the 8.6 million deaths from conditions treatable by health care, poor-quality care is responsible for an estimated 5 million deaths per year -- more than deaths due to insufficient access to care (3.6 million) .

G7 on do violent communities foster violent kids?Health, science suggests global action to reduce the impact of climate on health
Italian Minister of Health Beatrice Lorenzin presented the results of the research in Milan during the meeting on Health attended by the G7 ministers.

Global ocean health relatively stable over past 5 years
While global ocean health has remained relatively stable over the past five years, individual countries have seen changes, according to a study published July 5, 2017 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Benjamin Halpern from University of California Santa Barbara, USA and colleagues.

Global health focus of new research partnership
The University of Adelaide's Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) has taken another major step forward in its mission to translate the best possible research into real health outcomes, by entering into a new partnership with the Campbell Collaboration.

The Lancet Global Health: Arab uprising has had long-term effect on health, lowering life expectancy in several countries
The Arab uprising in 2010 and subsequent wars in the eastern Mediterranean region have had serious detrimental effects on the health and life expectancy of the people living in many of the 22 countries in the region [1], according to a major new analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (GBD 2013), published in The Lancet Global Health journal.

Read More: Global Health News and Global Health Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.