Plate Boundary Observatory will map seismic processes across North America

December 08, 2003

To some, the $100 million, five-year effort to sprinkle seismic sensors in Alaska and throughout the western United States is known as the Plate Boundary Observatory (PBO).

But to geophysicist Paul Segall it is something more.

''This kind of thing happens once in a career,'' says Segall, a professor of geophysics at Stanford University who chairs the PBO advisory board that determined just how this sprinkling should occur.

PBO is part of the $219 million EarthScope project to understand no less than the structure and evolution of the entire North American continent. The National Science Foundation (NSF), which is funding the project, notes that EarthScope was launched exactly 200 years after the Lewis and Clark Expedition.

''This time, however, instead of toting sextants and compasses to map the surface, scientists will bring seismometers, state-of-the art drilling equipment, satellites and Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers to map Earth's interior,'' according to the NSF website.

Plate boundary

Tremendous violence occurs at the boundary between the Pacific and North American plates of the Earth's crust. As the plates come together near the West Coast, they continue to smash into each other in slow motion - a process that has been going on for millions of years and has given rise to many prominent features of the North American landscape, including the San Andreas Fault and the Cascade Mountains.

This boundary will be the focus of PBO. ''It is where the action is,'' Segall said.

The grinding action generates subtle deformation across the continent. Eventually, hundreds of sensors will be in place to measure this deformation and help geologists understand the shifting strains in the ground. But first, Segall and his colleagues need to answer some questions, including two that will be discussed at the American Geophysical Union (AGU) conference in San Francisco on Dec. 10.

Setting up sensors, reading results

Lest they be accused of not being creative, consider how geologists usually decide where to place expensive equipment such as GPS receivers.

''Typically it is by gut feel,'' Segall said.

In a project compared to Lewis and Clark's Corps of Discovery, gut feel just won't do. So Segall, along with University of Oregon geologist David Schmidt and Stanford graduate student Jessica Murray, built mathematical models to figure out exactly how these sensors should be arrayed across the landscape.

It's a good thing they did. Their models suggested several changes in how to configure the network, particularly in the seismically active Pacific Northwest.

Segall compared the work to optimize the sensor network to the work of astronomers to design telescopes. Stargazers pick one type of instrument to look at objects nearby in the solar system and another type to peer into deep space, he said.

Similarly, the sensors might be set up differently depending on the specific seismic effects, depths and time scales his colleagues are interested in. According to Segall, the models that Schmidt will present at the AGU conference will make it easier for competing research interests to compromise.

Another fundamental issue facing researchers is how to interpret the data returned by the sensors - an analog to the age-old problem in science of distinguishing signal from noise. Devices called strainmeters that measure deformation deep in the Earth are planned to be used in the project.

But the devices are very sensitive. It is difficult to determine if the data represent widespread aftereffects of a volcanic eruption or a small, insignificant crack appearing in the rock near the device itself, Segall explained: ''They feel everything.''

At the AGU conference, Segall will talk about the challenges of understanding the data returned by these devices. Given that PBO sensors are scheduled to be installed early next year, there is an urgency behind this math-heavy topic.

''There are only a few dozen strainmeters around the world today, but we are set to install around 200 of them,'' he noted.

From sextants to seismometers

Segall is excited about the technology set to be deployed for the project. ''PBO scientists will be able to monitor activity at North America's plate boundaries with unprecedented accuracy at periods ranging from the seconds it takes for small earthquakes to rupture to the decades it takes for magma to accumulate beneath volcanoes,'' he said.

And he won't be the only one participating in this once-in-a-career event. According to NSF, all EarthScope data will be made available in close to real time on the web for the benefit of academics and amateurs alike.

Well-water studies

During the AGU conference, Segall also will discuss his recent research on earthquakes in Iceland. Working with scientists from Harvard University and the National Energy Authority in Iceland, Segall compared how subtle deformations at ground level and water levels in wells changed over time following an earthquake.

Segall used a unique combination of new and old technology. Color-coded satellite images revealed changes in the crust after the quake, while galoshes-clad researchers on the ground took measurements from wells that dot the Icelandic landscape. He found a clear correlation between the two sets of data. In effect, the shifting water levels revealed the shifting stresses in the Earth's crust following the quakes.

Peter Gilles, geologist at the University of California-Los Angeles and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said the results might have a practical use.

''One of the main concerns after a major earthquake is the possible triggering of other earthquakes on nearby faults,'' Gilles said. ''Understanding how the stress is modified on adjacent faults has direct implications on risk assessment after an event.''

Segall's Icelandic results are described in the July 10 issue of the journal Nature.
Geoff Koch is a Stanford University graduate student in journalism.

By Geoff Koch

News Service website:

Stanford Report (university newspaper):

Most recent news releases from Stanford:

COMMENT: Paul Segall, Department of Geophysics: (650) 725-7241,

EDITORS: The American Geophysical Union will hold its annual fall meeting Dec. 8 to 12 at Moscone Center West, 800 Howard St., San Francisco, CA 94103. Paul Segall and David Schmidt will present their findings at the AGU session ''Before PBO: What Do We Know? III'' on Dec. 10 beginning at 4 p.m. PST in room MCC 2010. A photo of Segall is available at (slug: ''AGU_PBO''). This release was written by Geoff Koch, a Stanford University graduate student in journalism.

Relevant Web URLs:

Stanford University

Related Sensors Articles from Brightsurf:

OPD optical sensors that reproduce any color
POSTECH Professor Dae Sung Chung's team uses chemical doping to freely control the colors of organic photodiodes.

Airdropping sensors from moths
University of Washington researchers have created a sensor system that can ride aboard a small drone or an insect, such as a moth, until it gets to its destination.

How to bounce back from stretched out stretchable sensors
Elastic can stretch too far and that could be problematic in wearable sensors.

New mathematical tool can select the best sensors for the job
In the 2019 Boeing 737 Max crash, the recovered black box from the aftermath hinted that a failed pressure sensor may have caused the ill-fated aircraft to nose dive.

Lighting the way to porous electronics and sensors
Researchers from Osaka University have created porous titanium dioxide ceramic thin films, at high temperatures and room temperature.

Russian scientists to improve the battery for sensors
Researchers of Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU) approached the creation of a solid-state thin-film battery for miniature devices and sensors.

Having an eye for colors: Printable light sensors
Cameras, light barriers, and movement sensors have one thing in common: they work with light sensors that are already found in many applications.

Improving adhesives for wearable sensors
By conveniently and painlessly collecting data, wearable sensors create many new possibilities for keeping tabs on the body.

Kirigami inspires new method for wearable sensors
As wearable sensors become more prevalent, the need for a material resistant to damage from the stress and strains of the human body's natural movement becomes ever more crucial.

Wearable sensors detect what's in your sweat
A team of scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, is developing wearable skin sensors that can detect what's in your sweat.

Read More: Sensors News and Sensors Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to