Nav: Home

Tracking breast cancer cell genetics reveals longer potential treatment window

December 08, 2016

Breast cancer cells break away and spread to other parts of the body relatively late on in breast tumour development, an international team of scientists has shown. The research, jointly led by Dr Peter Van Loo at the Francis Crick Institute, could help refine cancer therapy and is published in the journal Genome Biology.

The team of scientists in the UK, Belgium, Norway and the USA tracked the genetics of particular cancer cells that can go on to form secondary tumours in other parts of the body, such as the bone marrow. Such cells are known as disseminated tumour cells or DTCs.

The group's findings suggest there is a longer window than previously thought for cancer to be diagnosed and treated before it spreads. The majority of people who die from cancer lose their lives when it spreads throughout the body, a process called metastasis.

Dr Van Loo worked with colleagues from Oslo University Hospital in Norway, the University of Leuven in Belgium and the University of Chicago in the USA.

The team used the latest single-cell sequencing techniques to read out the full DNA genomes of 63 individual cells isolated from bone marrow samples donated by six breast cancer patients. The scientists have not only shown that cancer cells spread late, but also that when DTCs are present elsewhere in the body they are genetically very similar to the patient's original tumour.

This knowledge could help clinicians to choose the therapy most likely to destroy the cancer. Although the project focused on breast cancer, the team believes the results could be applied to other cancers too.

Dr Jonas Demeulemeester of the Francis Crick Institute, one of the joint first authors, said: "Although how tumours spread throughout the body is not well understood, we do know that some mutations increase a cell's ability to move about. Cells like this may leave the crowded environment of the primary tumour and enter blood vessels. Swept away by the bloodstream, they may exit the vessels again at distant sites and nest themselves in other tissues, such as the bone marrow. Cells surviving this whole process are known as disseminated tumour cells and can lay undetected and dormant for many years, often resisting therapy, before re-activating and giving rise to a new tumour, a metastasis."

The study focused on patients diagnosed with localised breast cancer - people with a tumour in their breast but no evidence of it having spread anywhere else in the body. The team took tumour and bone marrow samples when the patients were diagnosed and in one case, took samples again three years later.

Next they looked at the genetic information held in cells from both the tumour and bone marrow. The team developed sensitive methods to interrogate the genome of each sample that allowed them to spot both large and small-scale genetic changes.

Cancer happens when a series of genetic changes corrupts cell behaviour. The changes, or mutations, create a DNA signature specific to the cancer cell and the copies it makes of itself. By tracking mutations in cells from the original tumour and cells found in the bone marrow, they could compare the evolution of their DNA signatures and figure out when DTCs sprang from the tumour.

They found that when DTCs are present they are genetically very similar to the patient's original tumour.

"This knowledge is crucial to help determine the right therapy for patients. If a treatment is chosen specifically to target a mutation present in all cells of a patient's primary tumour then it is most likely the disseminated tumour cells will also carry this mutation and will also respond," explains Dr Demeulemeester.

The number of tumour cells detected in bone marrow also has a value in figuring out a patient's prognosis: the more tumour cells are found, the worse the outlook for the patient.

The new study suggests the number used as an indicator of outcome could be considerably refined.

The team discovered that some cells found in the patients' bone marrow didn't share any genetic history with the original breast tumour cells. These cells nonetheless had large-scale genetic changes and appeared to accumulate over time, suggesting that genetic mistakes can occur in normal, healthy tissues as well. The next stage of research is to look at what the relevance of these intermediate cells is to the development of cancer.

Dr Demeulemeester said: "Only a subset of those cells previously believed to be cancer cells have really spread from the patient's primary tumour. A refined indicator means a more accurate prognosis and a more tailored therapy for patients, avoiding over- or under-treatment."

Dr Justine Alford, Cancer Research UK's senior science information officer said: "Understanding more about how and when tumour cells spread is important, and this early research sheds light on the origins of these cells in breast cancer patients. When cancers spread they are often harder to treat, but this new study could help researchers develop new ways to tackle the disease more effectively."

* Please note: the researchers' availability for interview is more restricted later in the week. We will do our best, but interviews earlier this week are easier to arrange.

* The original paper: 'Tracing the origin of disseminated tumor cells in breast cancer using single-cell sequencing' is to be published in Genome Biology at 01.00 UK time on Friday 9 December. The article DOI is 10.1186/s13059-016-1109-7 and, when published, it will be available at:

* The study was jointly led by Dr Peter Van Loo at the Francis Crick Institute, Dr Bjørn Naume and Dr Vessela N Kristensen of the Oslo University Hospital (Norway), Dr Thierry Voet of the University of Leuven (Belgium) and Dr Kevin P White at the University of Chicago (USA).

* The research was funded by the K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research in Norway, the Research Council of Norway, Norwegian Cancer Society, the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), the Foundation against Cancer in Belgium and KU Leuven - University of Leuven.

* The Francis Crick Institute is a new and distinctive biomedical research institute. Research groups are now moving into its purpose built laboratory in the King's Cross area of London. The institute's work will help to understand why disease develops. We will find new ways to diagnose, prevent and treat a range of illnesses ? such as cancer, heart disease and stroke, infections and neurodegenerative diseases. We will bring together outstanding scientists from all disciplines, carrying out research that will help improve the health and quality of people's lives, and keeping the UK at the forefront of medical innovation. The Francis Crick Institute is a charity supported by the Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK, Wellcome, UCL (University College London), Imperial College London and King's College.

The Francis Crick Institute

Related Breast Cancer Articles:

Does MRI plus mammography improve detection of new breast cancer after breast conservation therapy?
A new article published by JAMA Oncology compares outcomes for combined mammography and MRI or ultrasonography screenings for new breast cancers in women who have previously undergone breast conservation surgery and radiotherapy for breast cancer initially diagnosed at 50 or younger.
Blood test offers improved breast cancer detection tool to reduce use of breast biopsy
A Clinical Breast Cancer study demonstrates Videssa Breast can inform better next steps after abnormal mammogram results and potentially reduce biopsies up to 67 percent.
Surgery to remove unaffected breast in early breast cancer increases
The proportion of women in the United States undergoing surgery for early-stage breast cancer who have preventive mastectomy to remove the unaffected breast increased significantly in recent years, particularly among younger women, and varied substantially across states.
Breast cancer patients with dense breast tissue more likely to develop contralateral disease
Breast cancer patients with dense breast tissue have almost a two-fold increased risk of developing disease in the contralateral breast, according to new research from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer.
Some early breast cancer patients benefit more from breast conservation than from mastectomy
Breast conserving therapy (BCT) is better than mastectomy for patients with some types of early breast cancer, according to results from the largest study to date, presented at ECC2017.
One-third of breast cancer patients not getting appropriate breast imaging follow-up exam
An annual mammogram is recommended after treatment for breast cancer, but nearly one-third of women diagnosed with breast cancer aren't receiving this follow-up exam, according to new findings presented at the 2016 Annual Clinical Congress of the American College of Surgeons.
Low breast density worsens prognosis in breast cancer
Even though dense breast tissue is a risk factor for breast cancer, very low mammographic breast density is associated with a worse prognosis in breast cancer patients.
Is breast conserving therapy or mastectomy better for early breast cancer?
Young women with early breast cancer face a difficult choice about whether to opt for a mastectomy or breast conserving therapy (BCT).
Breast density and outcomes of supplemental breast cancer screening
In a study appearing in the April 26 issue of JAMA, Elizabeth A.
Full dose radiotherapy to whole breast may not be needed in early breast cancer
Five years after breast-conserving surgery, radiotherapy focused around the tumor bed is as good at preventing recurrence as irradiating the whole breast, with fewer side effects, researchers from the UK have found in the large IMPORT LOW trial.

Related Breast Cancer Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Climate Crisis
There's no greater threat to humanity than climate change. What can we do to stop the worst consequences? This hour, TED speakers explore how we can save our planet and whether we can do it in time. Guests include climate activist Greta Thunberg, chemical engineer Jennifer Wilcox, research scientist Sean Davis, food innovator Bruce Friedrich, and psychologist Per Espen Stoknes.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#527 Honey I CRISPR'd the Kids
This week we're coming to you from Awesome Con in Washington, D.C. There, host Bethany Brookshire led a panel of three amazing guests to talk about the promise and perils of CRISPR, and what happens now that CRISPR babies have (maybe?) been born. Featuring science writer Tina Saey, molecular biologist Anne Simon, and bioethicist Alan Regenberg. A Nobel Prize winner argues banning CRISPR babies won’t work Geneticists push for a 5-year global ban on gene-edited babies A CRISPR spin-off causes unintended typos in DNA News of the first gene-edited babies ignited a firestorm The researcher who created CRISPR twins defends...