Nav: Home

Not free agents? Could human decisions actually be products of deterministic forces?

December 08, 2016

Decisions are not random. They are a connected network rippling from the past into the future. Is it not commonly accepted that human decision making is the result of free will and is therefore not deterministic? Yet there is an opposing view based on the theory of games that some aspects are deterministic. When this view is extended to include the system dynamics of space and time, an engineering approach to decision-based social structures becomes possible, with potentially profound consequences.

The author's approach to decision processes in this book is distinct from the normal one using Bayesian probability. Geometry, Language and Strategy: The Dynamics of Decision Processes (Volume 2) provides a unified deterministic extension using game theory as the foundation for spatial geometry. Time is incorporated into this foundation in a way consistent with ideas from system dynamics, a well-known approach used to model social and business phenomena. At the mathematical level, the theoretical structure is that used in electrical engineering, electromagnetic theory and gravitational theories, and so has been well-studied. At the application level, the structure reduces to game theory for static behaviors at the equilibrium point, but covers a significantly larger range. The foundation takes local behaviors and merges them into a unified and global theory.

Though the unification of behaviors is technical, the value is the ability to extrapolate local behaviors from a single point in space and time to behaviors for entire social structures and their evolution in time. A consequence, for example, is that competitive behavior, which forms the kernel of game theory, must be joined with distinct codes of conduct: both are needed to understand stable social structures.

The book gives a systematic and self-contained exposition of the foundation and indicates the various consequences with numerical examples. The exposition follows a path similar to engineering disciplines, with many of the same prerequisites. The ideas were first presented in Vol. 1 with examples of harmonic behaviors.

This volume extends the examples to forced harmonic and transient behaviors. It explores in much more depth the role spatial connectivity plays in decision making. One example is how related stocks perform in the market. The volume provides background information for the student that wishes to learn the discipline and apply it to their own problems. In that sense it can be viewed as a textbook on the subject.
This book retails for US$222 / £184 at major bookstores. To know more about the book or to purchase the book, visit

About the Author

Gerald H. Thomas has 10 years of experience in high energy particle physics at CERN, Switzerland, University of Helsinki, Finland and Argonne National Laboratory, USA; and 11 years of experience in Engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, USA. He has also gained 25 years of experience in the corporate world at AT&T Bell Labs (now Nokia Bell Labs), USA, Motorola (Cellular Division), USA, and a successful start-up company in Florida, USA; in project management, software engineering, and senior and executive management. Dr Thomas has worked closely with System Dynamics consultants trained at MIT to help control the delivery and staffing over-runs for a large software project. It was this project that generated the idea that a deterministic theory of decisions could apply not only to software projects, but more generally to any field of human endeavor in which decisions play a significant role. The key was to tie this idea to a theoretical foundation, which his experience in particle physics provided.

About World Scientific Publishing Co.

World Scientific Publishing is a leading independent publisher of books and journals for the scholarly, research, professional and educational communities. The company publishes about 600 books annually and about 130 journals in various fields. World Scientific collaborates with prestigious organizations like the Nobel Foundation, US National Academies Press, as well as its subsidiary, the Imperial College Press, amongst others, to bring high quality academic and professional content to researchers and academics worldwide. To find out more about World Scientific, please visit

For more information, contact Amanda Yun at

World Scientific

Related Decision Making Articles:

Brain: How to optimize decision making?
Our brains are constantly faced with different choices. Why is it so difficult to make up our mind when faced with two or more choices?
How do social networks shape political decision-making?
New research shows that social media's influence on voting goes beyond bots and foreign interference.
What are you looking at? How attention affects decision-making
Scientists using eye-tracking technology have found that what we look at helps guide our decisions when faced with two visible choices, such as snack food options.
Casino lights and sounds encourage risky decision-making
The blinking lights and exciting jingles in casinos may encourage risky decision-making and potentially promote problem gambling behaviour, suggests new research from the University of British Columbia.
Education improves decision-making ability, study finds
A new study led by Hyuncheol Bryant Kim, assistant professor of policy analysis and management at Cornell University, found that education can be leveraged to help enhance an individual's economic decision-making quality or economic rationality.
More Decision Making News and Decision Making Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...