Fairness Is Key In Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions Agreement

December 08, 1997

University Park, Pa. -- A global system of tradeable carbon dioxide permits has the potential to galvanize support for a greenhouse gas emissions treaty that can solve the problem at lowest possible cost, and is fair to both industrialized and developing nations, according to a Penn State energy and environmental economist.

Unfortunately, there is no universal consensus on the best definition of fairness, or equity, but the negotiation process can be facilitated if countries understand the full ramifications of various alternatives.

"We have found that the fairness of final economic outcomes does not significantly rely on the fairness of the first principles used to allocate emission permits or set tax differentials," says Dr. Adam Z. Rose, professor and head of the Department of Energy, Environment and Mineral Economics at Penn State.

The issues of greenhouse gas reduction and tradeable carbon dioxide emission permits figure heavily in the Third Conference of the Parties of the Framework Convention on Climate Change currently underway in Kyoto, Japan.

Rose and Brandt Steven of the California Energy Commission applied a non-linear mathematical programming model of greenhouse gas reduction to a representative sample of eight major countries or country groups, using a variety of equity criteria including some that were process-based, allocation-based and outcome-based.

"There are a number of seemingly disparate equity principles that yield similar sets of intercountry welfare outcomes, and, thereby, could reduce tensions at the bargaining table if policy-makers focus on bottom-line economic impacts," the researchers say in the December issue of the International Journal of Environment and Pollution. "However, some seemingly reasonable principles are probably untenable from both a political and fairness standpoint."

The most surprising result was the outcome of a criterion labeled "Egalitarian," based on the idea that all people have an equal right to pollute and to be protected from pollution. This criterion would distribute emission permits in proportion to population.

This method of allocation would require the U.S. to spend $161 billion annually on carbon dioxide abatement. Western Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States (part of the former Soviet Union) also would incur large costs. The trading of emission permits reduces these costs significantly but requires the U.S. to spend more than $31 billion per year on permits.

"These large negative benefits for industrialized countries, even with trading, implies the Egalitarian rule is likely to be unacceptable to the most powerful treaty signatories," says Rose. "Our empirical analysis has uncovered a likely political infeasibility that is not apparent when this criterion is presented in the abstract."

While an Egalitarian approach would harm industrialized countries, the researchers identify other fair and likely acceptable rules for sharing the cost burden and still ensuring that an agreement to limit emissions is cost effective.

The developing countries must assure that their interests do not become subservient to global efficiency alone. Because there is no efficiency-equity tradeoff under a tradeable permit system, all countries can address equity issue head on. At the same time, developing countries must be willing to participate in marketable permits and global trading. They must also ensure that the allocation and distribution of any carbon tax be equitable.

Decisions must be based on formal equity criteria rather than general rules of thumb that may not lead to intended outcomes, and developing countries must aim for equitable outcomes rather than merely equitable permit allocations. To this end, the fairness of procedural matters, while important, should not take precedence over a fair outcome.

Developing countries must also consider the cost of mitigation in terms of future economic growth and, at the same time, keep the cost of mitigation in their countries from rising over time.

Perhaps the most important aspect for developing countries is that they must participate in the global warming agreement. If they do not, other countries might delay and not act in time to prevent sizable damages from taking place.

"It is possible to conceive of agreements that are fair to developing countries, in terms of low mitigation costs or high transfers, and also helpful to industrialized countries in terms of saving high mitigation costs," says Rose. "We emphasize the usefulness of being able to gauge the end result of various negotiating principles, so that countries can see the full ramifications of their positions.




EDITOR: Dr. Rose may be reached at (814) 863-0179 or azr1@psu.edu by email.

Penn State

Related Climate Change Articles from Brightsurf:

Are climate scientists being too cautious when linking extreme weather to climate change?
Climate science has focused on avoiding false alarms when linking extreme events to climate change.

Mysterious climate change
New research findings underline the crucial role that sea ice throughout the Southern Ocean played for atmospheric CO2 in times of rapid climate change in the past.

Mapping the path of climate change
Predicting a major transition, such as climate change, is extremely difficult, but the probabilistic framework developed by the authors is the first step in identifying the path between a shift in two environmental states.

Small change for climate change: Time to increase research funding to save the world
A new study shows that there is a huge disproportion in the level of funding for social science research into the greatest challenge in combating global warming -- how to get individuals and societies to overcome ingrained human habits to make the changes necessary to mitigate climate change.

Sub-national 'climate clubs' could offer key to combating climate change
'Climate clubs' offering membership for sub-national states, in addition to just countries, could speed up progress towards a globally harmonized climate change policy, which in turn offers a way to achieve stronger climate policies in all countries.

Review of Chinese atmospheric science research over the past 70 years: Climate and climate change
Over the past 70 years since the foundation of the People's Republic of China, Chinese scientists have made great contributions to various fields in the research of atmospheric sciences, which attracted worldwide attention.

A CERN for climate change
In a Perspective article appearing in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Tim Palmer (Oxford University), and Bjorn Stevens (Max Planck Society), critically reflect on the present state of Earth system modelling.

Fairy-wrens change breeding habits to cope with climate change
Warmer temperatures linked to climate change are having a big impact on the breeding habits of one of Australia's most recognisable bird species, according to researchers at The Australian National University (ANU).

Believing in climate change doesn't mean you are preparing for climate change, study finds
Notre Dame researchers found that although coastal homeowners may perceive a worsening of climate change-related hazards, these attitudes are largely unrelated to a homeowner's expectations of actual home damage.

Older forests resist change -- climate change, that is
Older forests in eastern North America are less vulnerable to climate change than younger forests, particularly for carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity, new research finds.

Read More: Climate Change News and Climate Change Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.