Penn Bioethicists Suggest Updating Protections For Human Research Subjects

December 08, 1998

(Philadelphia, PA) -- Regulations governing the use of human subjects in biomedical research in the United States must be updated to keep pace with rapid changes in the medical practice to which they are meant to apply, recommend bioethicists at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. They suggest that, even though current practices have worked well for the past two or three decades, the pace of research today is outdistancing the present system. The team's recommendations, which will appear in today's Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), also include specific key guidelines based on research done by the Project on Informed Consent of the Human Research Ethics Group at Penn's Center for Bioethics. "Change is essential if the same level of protection is to be afforded human subjects who participate in research in the future," notes co-author Paul Root Wolpe, PhD.

The model of research for which existing regulations were designed evolved around a single investigator funded by the National Institutes of Health or other governmental sources, using subjects at a single location. Today's research, however, often involves private funding at multiple institutions by many investigators. "One of the most important recommendations made by the Human Research Ethics Group," states Arthur L. Caplan, PhD, director of Penn's Center for Bioethics and a co-author of the study, "is the extension of any existing and future protections for human research in the United States -- regardless of whether they are publicly or privately funded, or whether the research is aimed at producing commercial products."

Moreover, in recent years, some members of vulnerable groups, including those with mental illnesses, soldiers, institutionalized children, and pregnant women have been subjected to abuse or misconduct in the research setting. "These problems also reveal the need to revisit the policies in place for the protection of human subjects," states Wolpe.

Penn's Human Research Ethics Group took a comprehensive look at the system rather than examining it from the standpoint of individual populations of potential research subjects. They put forth many recommendations as to how to best update and revamp existing protections for human subjects. Changes to the current system suggested by the Group include: protecting the rights of the mentally ill through durable power of attorney and advance directives; tighter monitoring of studies involving persons with cognitive impairment; creating clearer and more specific consent forms for cases where there is no expected benefit from participation for subjects; and fortification of local peer review boards. In addition, it is recommended that Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) should be directly informed of all potential conflicts of interest that exist for investigators and institutions.

The study was also co-authored by Jonathan D. Moreno, PhD, of the Center for Biomedical Ethics, University of Virginia.

Editor's note: Drs. Wolpe and Caplan may be reached directly by calling 215-898-7136.
-end-


University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Related Biomedical Research Articles from Brightsurf:

General data protection regulation hinders global biomedical research
The European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) was designed to give EU citizens greater protection and control of their personal data, particularly when transferred to entities outside the EU.

Novel educational program puts a human face on biomedical research
The goal of translational research is to speed research breakthroughs into clinical practice.

Biomedical research may miss key information by ignoring genetic ancestry
A new study of Black residents of four distinct US cities reveals variations in genetic ancestry and social status that underscore the inadequacy of using skin color as a proxy for race in research.

Advances in cryo-EM materials may aid cancer and biomedical research
Cryogenic-Electron Microscopy (cryo-EM) has been a game changer in the field of medical research, but the substrate, used to freeze and view samples under a microscope, has not advanced much in decades.

World-first program uncovers errors in biomedical research results
Just like the wrong ingredients can spoil a cake, so too can the wrong ingredients spoil the results in biomedical research.

Scientists poised to study reproducibility of Brazilian biomedical research
A project to assess the reproducibility of biomedical research in Brazil has been described today in the open-access journal eLife.

Transparency and reproducibility of biomedical research is improving
New research publishing Nov. 20 in the open-access journal PLOS Biology from Joshua Wallach, Kevin Boyack, and John Ioannidis suggests that progress has been made in key areas of research transparency and reproducibility.

As private funding of biomedical research soars, new risks arise
Academic medical centers (AMCs) in the US are navigating an increasing shift in research funding from historic public funding (e.g., NIH) to private sources such as pharma and biotech companies, foundations, and charities, raising a host of new issues related to collaborative research models, intellectual property rights, and scientific and ethical oversight.

BGRF scientists co-publish research paper on blockchain & AI for biomedical applications
Biogerontology Research Foundation Chief Science Officer (CSO) co-authored the landmark paper in the journal Oncotarget on the convergence of blockchain and AI to decentralize and galvanize healthcare and biomedical research.

Promising new drug for Hep B tested at Texas Biomedical Research Institute
Research at the Southwest National Primate Research Center (SNPRC) on the campus of Texas Biomedical Research Institute helped advance a new treatment now in human trials for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

Read More: Biomedical Research News and Biomedical Research Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.