Creating jobs with university-based research parks and incubators

December 09, 2009

COLLEGE PARK, Md. - Changes in federal policy can increase the effectiveness of a key national asset in job creation: university-based research parks and technology incubators, according to U.S. Senate testimony today by Brian Darmody, president of the Association of University Research Parks and a University of Maryland associate vice president. http://www.umresearch.umd.edu/misc/darmody_bio.html

"We can harness our existing research and development infrastructure to create new jobs, new opportunities, and new companies with administrative reforms and relatively modest federal direct investments," Darmody told the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.

In prepared testimony, Darmody recommended a series of actions, including loans, tax-free financing and more flexible government procedures for commercializing technology developed at incubators with federal support.
-end-
A complete transcript of his prepared remarks follows.

The Association of University Research Parks (AURP) is a professional association of university related research and science parks. Its mission is to foster innovation, commercialization and economic growth. http://www.aurp.net/

Darmody and the University of Maryland have taken a leadership role in developing Maryland's largest research park and technology incubators. http://www.newsdesk.umd.edu/uniini/release.cfm?ArticleID=2009http://www.newsdesk.umd.edu/uniini/release.cfm?ArticleID=1907

MEDIA CONTACT:

Neil Tickner
University of Maryland Communications
301-405-4622
ntickner@umd.edu

TESTIMONY OF BRIAN DARMODY
President, Association of University Research Parks; Associate VP, Research and Economic Development, University of Maryland.

United States Senate
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Research Parks and Job Creation: Innovation Through Cooperation
http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=9b8eec78-dbe3-4610-9480-9435a857b24b

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Research Parks and Jobs: Creating Communities of Innovation

I am Brian Darmody, President of the Association of University Research Parks (AURP), and Associate Vice President for Research and Economic Development, University of Maryland.

AURP represents over 300 research parks and communities of innovation in the United States and the world, and works closely with other organizations representing technology commercialization, seed and angel investing, incubator development and state economic development policies.

Research parks account for over 750,000 jobs in North America, according to a recent study.

This year AURP held its annual conference in Vancouver, British Columbia. On his 1927 tour to celebrate his solo flight across the Atlantic, Charles Lindbergh wouldn't fly to Vancouver because the airport was too small. The Vancouver government immediately bought land and built a larger airport for the fledgling air industry, which today serves as a major hub for international trade to the Pacific Rim and major jobs generator for British Columbia.

We view research parks as part of a nation's 21st century innovation infrastructure, just as airports and railroads did in earlier centuries, and high bandwidth internet backbone serves today. Innovation is key to job creation, and support for innovation an important federal mission.

The United States invented the research park model at Stanford University in 1951. However, other countries copied this model, building large research parks with investments from national governments, and attracting U.S. corporate research and development facilities. The United States no longer leads the world in research parks; See Wainova Atlas of Innovation (2009), and National Research Council, Understanding Research, Science and Technology Parks: Global Best Practices (2009).

The United States also invented university technology transfer with the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act, linking our 'best in the world' research university system with technology commercialization.

However, we no longer lead in university technology commercialization as research universities in the United Kingdom now outperform U.S. universities on a proportionate basis in terms of technology commercialization.

AURP recognizes that the U.S. government is facing severe budget constraints, but we believe we can harness our existing research and development infrastructure to create new jobs, new opportunities, and new companies with administrative reforms and relatively modest federal direct investments. See, Power of Place, A National Innovation Strategy AURP (2008).

Here are our five points:



  1. Infrastructure for Innovation: Research Parks:

    We strongly support Senator Pryor's Building a Stronger America Act to establish a loan guarantee program to develop research parks, and grant program for new park development.

  2. Tax-exempt financing of research facilities:

    We need to encourage development of privately financed facilities and support corporations to keep research and development in the U.S., instead of at research parks in other countries. Current IRS regulations on tax-exempt bonds should be reformed to remove tests on technology licensing to give greater flexibility to universities to negotiate with corporations on intellectual property issues. [CS1]See, IRS Rev. Pro. 97-14 regarding limitations on university technology licensing in facilities financed with tax-exempt bonds.

  3. Federal Laboratory System:

    $25 billion annually in research and development activity takes place internally in federal labs. Congress should i) create a new intermediary organization, modeled on what universities (such as WARF at U. of Wisconsin) and states (such as TEDCO in Maryland) use to more efficiently commercialize federal intramural technology, ii) develop programs to allow federal researchers to work more closely with private sector, and iii) create more federal research parks. See, Washington Business Journal, 'Unleashing Federal R and D,' B. Darmody, Oct 30-Nov. 5, 2009. http://washington.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2009/11/02/editorial1.html

  4. Improving University Technology Commercialization: We have Cash for Clunkers, Why Not Cash for Commercialization?

    There are many 'Valleys of Death' confronting university technology commercialization, but the first potential valley takes place when universities elect to take title to federally sponsored research under the Bayh-Dole Act. Often unless additional development work is done, these potential technologies lie fallow.

    Developing a program to provide flexibility and recognize the cost of technology commercialization and the need to develop 'proof of concept' tests or evaluation of these technologies in federal overhead rates would improve success rates of university-owned technology developed with federal funds and create more companies to fill our incubators and research parks. See, OMB Circular A-21

  5. Supporting Entrepreneurship: From STEM to STEEM:

    Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs traditionally focus on science and engineering skills. The key to employment growth in the United States needs to include building careers and new companies, not only jobs. Incubators and research parks are ideal places for new technology company formation. Therefore we call for Entrepreneurship to be imbedded in STEM programs and ideas, so the acronym would be STEEM: Science, Technology, Engineering, Entrepreneurship and Math.


The Obama Administration has signaled its strong willingness to work on innovation and entrepreneurship, such as by creating the Office of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. We look forward to working with the Administration and Congress to efficiently and effectively build Communities of Innovation in the United States in a comprehensive fashion and maintain U.S. technological competitiveness.

I want to thank the Commerce Committee and Senator Pryor for inviting AURP to the committee. Thank you.

Brian Darmody
President, AURP; Associate VP, University of Maryland

University of Maryland

Related Actions Articles from Brightsurf:

Brain region implicated in predicting the consequences of actions
A new study highlights the sophisticated mental machinery that helps the brain simulate the results of different actions and make the best choice.

Monkey see others, monkey do: How the brain allows actions based on social cues
Researchers at the National Institute for Physiological Sciences in Japan have shown that when monkeys make decisions based on social cues provided by other monkeys, information flow from one part of the brain (the ventral premotor cortex) to another (medial prefrontal cortex) is vital.

Simple actions can help people survive landslides
Simple actions can dramatically improve a person's chances of surviving a landslide, according to records from 38 landslides in the US and around the world.

A sustainable future requires holistic actions towards ambitious biodiversity goals
A 'safety net' made up of multiple, interlinked and ambitious goals is needed to tackle nature's alarming decline.

Children have very precise expectations about adults' communicative actions
Adults talk to babies differently from how we would speak to other adults.

Training in mental ill-health a determinant of managers' preventive actions
Managers who have received training in mental health issues, and whose workplaces run general information campaigns on mental health, are significantly more likely to work preventively in this area vis-à-vis their subordinates, a study shows.

Potentially large economic impacts of climate change can be avoided by human actions
A study estimates global-scale, multi-sectoral economic impacts of climate change, and suggests that a plausible range of decisions and actions by humans can determine the scale of the economic impacts, even if the uncertainty in the climate response to increased greenhouse gas concentration is considered.

OSU ecologist: Ocean-based actions can close gaps in climate change mitigation
Ocean-based actions have greater potential to fill in gaps in climate change mitigation than previously appreciated, scientists explain in a paper published today in Science.

Exploring a strategy that leads to mutual cooperation without non-cooperative actions
A research team led by Hitoshi Yamamoto from Rissho University analyzed which strategies would be effective in the prisoner's dilemma game, into which a new behavior of not participating in the game was introduced.

Actions to save coral reefs could benefit all ecosystems
Scientists say bolder actions to protect the world's coral reefs will benefit all ecosystems, human livelihoods and improve food security.

Read More: Actions News and Actions Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.