Low doses of radiation in nature may pose more riskDecember 11, 2001
NEW YORK, NY -- Radiation can trigger widespread mutations in living cells at much lower doses than the amount scientists previously believed could do such damage, according to findings from a study by Columbia researchers. The research may help public health officials reconsider what levels of radiation in nature should be deemed safe.
Led by professor of radiation oncology and public health Dr. Tom K. Hei, the study found that a dose that strikes as few as one in 10 cells has nearly the same mutagenic (mutation-causing) effect as a dose that strikes every cell. The added damage occurs, the researchers say, because of what is called the "bystander effect," in which injured cells send aberrant signals to neighboring cells. The study is to be published in the Dec. 4th issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.
The researchers found the bystander effect occurs with alpha particles, a common type of radiation that comes from sources such as nuclear explosions, plutonium, and radon, a naturally occurring gas that seeps into many homes.
In the National Cancer Institute-funded study, the researchers beamed a single alpha particle through the nuclei of randomly selected cells growing in petri dishes. Alpha particles consist of the nuclei, or cores, of helium atoms. The radiation was equivalent to a dose below 20 centiGrays.
A centiGray is a unit used in radiation measurement. The radiation employed in the study is considered low-level. Mine workers are occasionally exposed to such levels of radiation. People in radon-contaminated homes are rarely exposed to these levels. The risks of exposure to lower radiation levels are poorly understood and have been the subject of controversy for decades.
In the study, the researchers found that when they beamed alpha particles at only one in 10 cells, the results were almost the same as if they had beamed them at all the cells. "If you only hit 10 percent of the cells, your damage is comparable to what would happen if every cell in the population is hit," Dr. Hei says. "There's a huge 'bystander' response."
Nearly all the cells showed mutations in their DNA. Mutations in DNA can lead to cancer in tissues within the body and to birth defects in future generations if the alterations occur in sperm and egg cells or to a developing fetus. The investigators, however, were able to prevent the widespread damage if they blocked the signaling network that exists between cells.
By using chemicals that obstruct key cell-to-cell pathways, called gap junctions, the scientists could restrict the damage to the 10 percent of cells that had directly received alpha particles. The results, Dr. Hei says, suggest that signaling networks are responsible for spreading the damage. The signaling mechanism, however, is unknown and requires further research.
The researchers used a hybrid of human and hamster cells for the study, because these cells are resilient and useful for mutation research. Future studies will use human cells, Dr. Hei says.
The findings raise questions about how to measure radiation exposure risk. Historically, public health officials have assumed radiation carries a risk proportional to the dose in what is called a linear relationship. Lower doses bring accordingly lower risk. But the findings suggest a linear relationship might not be operating, the Columbia researchers say. Instead, the study suggests that at low doses, the risk rises steeply in proportion to the dose. At higher doses, the risk rises more gently in relation to the dose.
The study is "another piece of hard evidence to suggest we may need to reassess" acceptable radiation levels, says Dr. Howard L. Liber, associate professor of radiobiology at Harvard School of Public Health. Dr. Liber is a member of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, a non-profit group that advises the government about radiation safety.
The study isn't the first to find a "bystander effect," but is the first to identify the effect for mutations, Dr. Liber says. Other studies have found a bystander effect in the expression of certain genes, such as p53, and in what is called sister chromatid exchange, the exchange of DNA in cells in the body.
"The uniqueness of our study is the precision of the targeting of cells," Dr. Hei says. "We show which cell is hit and by what dose of radiation, a major improvement over previous studies."
- Although the findings raise concern, Drs. Hei and Liber say they shouldn't cause alarm. The findings don't show that a huge new population of people is at risk. Rather, they show the cancer risk at low doses may be significantly higher than once thought and help clarify how radiation makes people sick.
- Dr. Hei says the study should also help remind people to get their homes tested for radon - a colorless, odorless gas that comes from the natural breakdown of uranium underground. Radon causes thousands of deaths yearly. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recommends homes be tested for the gas. -end-
Columbia University Medical Center
Related Public Health Articles from Brightsurf:COVID-19 and the decolonization of Indigenous public health
Indigenous self-determination, leadership and knowledge have helped protect Indigenous communities in Canada during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and these principles should be incorporated into public health in future, argue the authors of a commentary in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) http://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.200852.
Public health consequences of policing homelessness
In a new study examining homelessness, researchers find that policy such a lifestyle has massive public health implications, making sleeping on the street even MORE unhealthy.
Electronic health information exchange improves public health disease reporting
Disease tracking is an important area of focus for health departments in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Pandemic likely to cause long-term health problems, Yale School of Public Health finds
The coronavirus pandemic's life-altering effects are likely to result in lasting physical and mental health consequences for many people--particularly those from vulnerable populations--a new study led by the Yale School of Public Health finds.
The Lancet Public Health: US modelling study estimates impact of school closures for COVID-19 on US health-care workforce and associated mortality
US policymakers considering physical distancing measures to slow the spread of COVID-19 face a difficult trade-off between closing schools to reduce transmission and new cases, and potential health-care worker absenteeism due to additional childcare needs that could ultimately increase mortality from COVID-19, according to new modelling research published in The Lancet Public Health journal.
The Lancet Public Health: Access to identification documents reflecting gender identity may improve trans mental health
Results from a survey of over 20,000 American trans adults suggest that having access to identification documents which reflect their identified gender helps to improve their mental health and may reduce suicidal thoughts, according to a study published in The Lancet Public Health journal.
The Lancet Public Health: Study estimates mental health impact of welfare reform, Universal Credit, in Great Britain
The 2013 Universal Credit welfare reform appears to have led to an increase in the prevalence of psychological distress among unemployed recipients, according to a nationally representative study following more than 52,000 working-age individuals from England, Wales, and Scotland over nine years between 2009-2018, published as part of an issue of The Lancet Public Health journal on income and health.
BU researchers: Pornography is not a 'public health crisis'
Researchers from the Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) have written an editorial in the American Journal of Public Health special February issue arguing against the claim that pornography is a public health crisis, and explaining why such a claim actually endangers the health of the public.
The Lancet Public Health: Ageism linked to poorer health in older people in England
Ageism may be linked with poorer health in older people in England, according to an observational study of over 7,500 people aged over 50 published in The Lancet Public Health journal.
Study: Public transportation use linked to better public health
Promoting robust public transportation systems may come with a bonus for public health -- lower obesity rates.
Read More: Public Health News and Public Health Current Events