Blood test could provide cheaper, better way for doctors to manage lung cancer

December 12, 2016

Profiling the genes of lung-tumor cells from patient blood samples may be a cheap, noninvasive way to help doctors choose the right treatments, according to a study led by researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine.

The new findings strengthen the hope that evaluating the genetic profiles of tumor cells circulating in the bloodstream could transform cancer care: first, by indicating the next chemotherapy or targeted therapy to use when tumors evolve resistance to previous drugs; and, second, by providing a way to study how tumors change over time. The new blood test is safer, cheaper, faster and more effective than alternative diagnostic approaches, according to the study.

The researchers created a system for isolating circulating tumor cells from the blood of cancer patients and reading a handful of genes from inside each tumor cell. Thus, they were able to obtain genetic information about the original cancer tumor that resides deep in the lungs without doing a biopsy, which can be dangerous for the patient.

"We are trying to make minimally invasive technology that allows us to continuously monitor one person's health over time," said radiology instructor Seung-min Park, PhD, a lead author of the new study, which will be published online Dec. 12 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Park shares lead authorship of the study with former Stanford graduate students Dawson Wong, PhD, and Chin Chun Ooi.

Tumor changes

It's common for cancer therapies to fail after a few months, often because the cancer evolves resistance to the treatment. At that point, it's important to understand how the patient's tumor is changing. "Without a biopsy and genetic profiling, we are flying blind, trying to select a second or third option for therapy and hoping it works," Park said. But repeated lung biopsies are too hard on patients. Even CT scans, performed to see whether a tumor is shrinking or growing, increase the body's exposure to damaging X-rays. "Blood-based monitoring would allow us to select the right second and third therapies instead of flying blind," he said.

Finding a way to look at circulating tumor cells, or CTCs, in the blood has been a goal of oncologists for years. When people die of cancer, it's usually from metastasis, the spread of tumors throughout the body. Part of metastasis is the entry of tumor cells into the bloodstream, where they circulate along with normal blood cells, eventually landing in other organs and initiating tumors there. In general, the presence of CTCs in the blood of cancer patients predicts patients will live for a shorter time.

"This work fits well into our bigger vision of using blood-based diagnostics to detect and manage disease, including cancer," said Sanjiv "Sam" Gambhir, MD, PhD professor and chair of radiology and the Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Professor in Cancer Research. "By being able to characterize single CTCs, we believe cancer management, including predicting response to therapy, will be much better optimized."

Gambhir shares senior authorship of the study with Shan Wang, PhD, professor of materials science and engineering and of electrical engineering, and Viswam Nair, MD, clinical assistant professor of medicine and of radiology.

How it's done

The blood typically contains very few CTCs, so one of the challenges for oncologists has been to separate them from ordinary blood cells. The new technique involves taking blood from lung cancer patients and then attaching antibodies to circulating tumor cells. Once the cancer cells are labeled, the team introduces magnetic nanoparticles designed to attach to the antibodies labeling the cancer cells. With each individual cancer cell labeled with a magnetic nanoparticle, the researchers can then use a device called a magnetic sifter, or MagSifter, previously developed by Wang.

The MagSifter is an electromagnetic sieve that can be turned on and off. When the MagSifter is on, it pulls the nanoparticle-labeled CTCs from the blood sample and allows the rest of the blood to flow through the sifter. The CTCs pulled from the blood are then deposited into a flat array of tiny wells, each large enough for only one cell. Now the tumor cells are ready for genetic analysis. Each flat of 25,600 wells looks like a miniature muffin tin, with room for a lot of tiny muffins.

The new technique serves as a proof of concept for collecting and analyzing lung cancer cells from blood samples. If the technique receives approval from the Food and Drug Administration, it could be used to tell how cancer cells have evolved in response to chemotherapy and which drug is the best to use next in individual patients.

In principle, the technique should work just as well with other kinds of cancers, Wong said. "We validated our device on lung cancer because of the difficulties of doing lung biopsies," he said. "But the technology is not limited to profiling lung cancer. We could swap out markers and adapt the technique to other types of cancers."

Cost of less than $30

The approach that the team developed could be used to look at mutations in three or four genes, and it requires no more than 2 milliliters of blood -- about half a teaspoon. The test can be completed in about five hours, the researcher said, and costs less than $30. For comparison, a single state-of-the art biopsy of lung tissue with DNA sequencing costs about $18,000 and takes as long as three weeks to furnish results. Johnson & Johnson's CellSearch -- another blood test, already approved by the FDA -- costs about $900 and takes a week to deliver results.

"We feel that we have solved a lot of the technical hurdles," said Wong. "The blood draw is cheap enough and noninvasive enough that it could be done on a weekly basis throughout treatment."

The team's work is an example of Stanford Medicine's focus on precision health, the goal of which is to anticipate and prevent disease in the healthy and precisely diagnose and treat disease in the ill.
-end-
Other Stanford co-authors are graduate students David Kurtz, MD, Amin Aalipour and Jacob Chabon; postdoctoral scholar Ophir Vermesh, MD, PhD; research assistants Kelsey Pian and Justin Carter; former research assistant Susie Suh; instructor of radiology Mehran Jamali, MD; clinical research associate Carmen Say; professor of medicine Ware Kuschner, MD; professor of medicine Erich Schwartz, MD; professor of cardiothoracic surgery Joseph Shrager, MD; assistant professor of medicine Joel Neal, MD, PhD; associate professor of medicine Heather Wakelee, MD; and assistant professor of radiation oncology Maximilian Diehn, MD, PhD.

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants U54CA151459 and R21CA185804), the Canary Foundation, and the LUNGevity Foundation.

Stanford's Department of Medicine also supported the work.

Stanford University has filed for patents on the technology used in connection with this work.

The Stanford University School of Medicine consistently ranks among the nation's top medical schools, integrating research, medical education, patient care and community service. For more news about the school, please visit http://med.stanford.edu/school.html. The medical school is part of Stanford Medicine, which includes Stanford Health Care and Stanford Children's Health. For information about all three, please visit http://med.stanford.edu.

Stanford University Medical Center

Related Lung Cancer Articles from Brightsurf:

State-level lung cancer screening rates not aligned with lung cancer burden in the US
A new study reports that state-level lung cancer screening rates were not aligned with lung cancer burden.

The lung microbiome may affect lung cancer pathogenesis and prognosis
Enrichment of the lungs with oral commensal microbes was associated with advanced stage disease, worse prognosis, and tumor progression in patients with lung cancer, according to results from a study published in Cancer Discovery, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

New analysis finds lung cancer screening reduces rates of lung cancer-specific death
Low-dose CT screening methods may prevent one death per 250 at-risk adults screened, according to a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled clinical trials of lung cancer screening.

'Social smokers' face disproportionate risk of death from lung disease and lung cancer
'Social smokers' are more than twice as likely to die of lung disease and more than eight times as likely to die of lung cancer than non-smokers, according to research presented at the European Respiratory Society International Congress.

Lung cancer therapy may improve outcomes of metastatic brain cancer
A medication commonly used to treat non-small cell lung cancer that has spread, or metastasized, may have benefits for patients with metastatic brain cancers, suggests a new review and analysis led by researchers at St.

Cancer mortality continues steady decline, driven by progress against lung cancer
The cancer death rate declined by 29% from 1991 to 2017, including a 2.2% drop from 2016 to 2017, the largest single-year drop in cancer mortality ever reported.

Cancer-sniffing dogs 97% accurate in identifying lung cancer, according to study in JAOA
The next step will be to further fractionate the samples based on chemical and physical properties, presenting them back to the dogs until the specific biomarkers for each cancer are identified.

Lung transplant patients face elevated lung cancer risk
In an American Journal of Transplantation study, lung cancer risk was increased after lung transplantation, especially in the native (non-transplanted) lung of single lung transplant recipients.

Proposed cancer treatment may boost lung cancer stem cells, study warns
Epigenetic therapies -- targeting enzymes that alter what genes are turned on or off in a cell -- are of growing interest in the cancer field as a way of making a cancer less aggressive or less malignant.

Are you at risk for lung cancer?
This question isn't only for people who've smoked a lot.

Read More: Lung Cancer News and Lung Cancer Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.