USF report grades health performance of Florida's counties

December 13, 2001

TAMPA, Fla -- The health status of Florida's counties has been comparatively ranked for the first time in a statewide report published by University of South Florida researchers.

"This is a consumer report card intended to alert policy makers and elected officials to the strengths and weaknesses of the health performances of their communities," said James Studnicki, ScD, lead author of the report published in the November issue of the journal Managed Care Interface.

"Whenever you present a comparative report like this, it can be controversial. But we're hoping it promotes innovative approaches to closing the gap between the wealth and health of many of our citizens."

The researchers demonstrated, using Florida data, that a statistically reliable, yet practical, national system for rating the health of communities can be produced cost effectively in a format suitable for a broad audience. "Our goal is to create a yearly national rating for the health status of communities," said Dr. Studnicki, a USF professor of public health. "We can cost effectively reproduce the system we've demonstrated in Florida in all 50 states."

The report ranks 66 Florida counties within three peer groups, based on population size. (Union County was eliminated from the report because its large prison population made the county an extreme outlier for several health indicators.) Counties with the least favorable health ratings were primarily those with a larger percentage of people living in poverty.

Among the state's nine large metropolitan counties with 400,000 or more people, Brevard County scored the most favorable overall health rating (72.2%), while Polk County received the least favorable score (22.2%).

Charlotte County ranked the highest (75%) and Putnam County the lowest (25%) among 27 mid-size, predominantly surburban counties with 50,000 to 399,999 people.

Flagler County earned the highest overall health grade (77.8%) while Gadsden County got the lowest score (33.3%) among 30 small, rural counties with populations under 50,000.

The overall rating summarizes how much better or worse each county fares compared to its peer counties across 36 health indicators -- ranging from volume of AIDS cases and infant mortality rates to age-adjusted firearm deaths and the numbers of physicians and hospital beds per 1,000 population. So, for instance, a county with 27 out of 36 indicators better than average for its peer group would earn a favorability rating of 75 percent.

In addition, each Florida county is rated for strengths and weaknesses in six categories -- age-adjusted adult mortality; premature deaths/violence; screening, prevention and primary care; infectious disease morbidity; maternal and child health; and community capacity and resources.

The USF methodology converts statistics into a simplified format similar to the one popularized by Consumer Reports magazine. Two stars signify that a county is much better than average in a particular health category, two red flags indicate much worse than average, etc.

As the researchers expected, counties with the best overall health performance ratings tended to have more stars while flags were more plentiful in those with the lowest rankings. However, the report also brings to light the deficiencies within counties scoring high on overall health performance. For example, even top-ranked Charlotte County -- with stars in nearly every category -- was flagged for its lack of health screening and primary care prevention measures.

"Our methodology reinforces the idea that health is multidimensional. Problems can surface where you least expect, and you need to deal with them." Dr. Studnicki said.

The USF team spent the last 10 years developing a statistically reliable, yet practical, method to measure the health needs of communities, known as the Comprehensive Assessment for Tracking Community Health (CATCH). They completed individual reports for 20 Florida counties to help local officials identify and address high-priority health problems.

With the aid of a federal grant in 1998, the researchers created a data warehouse to automate the CATCH system and began working on the first statewide report as the prototype for a national rating system.
-end-


University of South Florida (USF Health)

Related Public Health Articles from Brightsurf:

COVID-19 and the decolonization of Indigenous public health
Indigenous self-determination, leadership and knowledge have helped protect Indigenous communities in Canada during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and these principles should be incorporated into public health in future, argue the authors of a commentary in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) http://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.200852.

Public health consequences of policing homelessness
In a new study examining homelessness, researchers find that policy such a lifestyle has massive public health implications, making sleeping on the street even MORE unhealthy.

Electronic health information exchange improves public health disease reporting
Disease tracking is an important area of focus for health departments in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pandemic likely to cause long-term health problems, Yale School of Public Health finds
The coronavirus pandemic's life-altering effects are likely to result in lasting physical and mental health consequences for many people--particularly those from vulnerable populations--a new study led by the Yale School of Public Health finds.

The Lancet Public Health: US modelling study estimates impact of school closures for COVID-19 on US health-care workforce and associated mortality
US policymakers considering physical distancing measures to slow the spread of COVID-19 face a difficult trade-off between closing schools to reduce transmission and new cases, and potential health-care worker absenteeism due to additional childcare needs that could ultimately increase mortality from COVID-19, according to new modelling research published in The Lancet Public Health journal.

The Lancet Public Health: Access to identification documents reflecting gender identity may improve trans mental health
Results from a survey of over 20,000 American trans adults suggest that having access to identification documents which reflect their identified gender helps to improve their mental health and may reduce suicidal thoughts, according to a study published in The Lancet Public Health journal.

The Lancet Public Health: Study estimates mental health impact of welfare reform, Universal Credit, in Great Britain
The 2013 Universal Credit welfare reform appears to have led to an increase in the prevalence of psychological distress among unemployed recipients, according to a nationally representative study following more than 52,000 working-age individuals from England, Wales, and Scotland over nine years between 2009-2018, published as part of an issue of The Lancet Public Health journal on income and health.

BU researchers: Pornography is not a 'public health crisis'
Researchers from the Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) have written an editorial in the American Journal of Public Health special February issue arguing against the claim that pornography is a public health crisis, and explaining why such a claim actually endangers the health of the public.

The Lancet Public Health: Ageism linked to poorer health in older people in England
Ageism may be linked with poorer health in older people in England, according to an observational study of over 7,500 people aged over 50 published in The Lancet Public Health journal.

Study: Public transportation use linked to better public health
Promoting robust public transportation systems may come with a bonus for public health -- lower obesity rates.

Read More: Public Health News and Public Health Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.