Nav: Home

More Chinese scientists in America are going back home

December 30, 2019

COLUMBUS, Ohio - A growing number of Chinese scientists working in the United States and other parts of the world are returning to their homeland, enhancing China's research productivity.

In a new study, researchers found that more than 16,000 researchers have returned to China from other countries since that nation has opened up to international engagement. More than 4,500 left the United States for China in 2017 - nearly double the number who left in 2010.

These foreign-trained researchers are helping grow China into a scientific powerhouse, said Caroline Wagner, co-author of the study and associate professor in the John Glenn College of Public Affairs at The Ohio State University.

"In our lifetime, China has joined the global scientific community to become world-class in a number of critical fields, such as AI and materials science," Wagner said.

"As more of their researchers return home, that rise is going to continue."

The study was published online this month in the journal Science and Public Policy.

For the study, the researchers made use of a scientific publisher's (Elsevier) database that allowed them to track researchers based on their publications in scientific journals.

The study's authors traced the paths of Chinese authors who first published in China and then subsequently in a different country, or, first published abroad and then in China, to track individual mobility.

Results showed that the number of Chinese researchers going to the United States is larger than the number going to Europe. Chinese scientists are more likely to return to their home from Europe than from the United States.

"The most elite Chinese scientists are more likely to stay in the United States than go home - and that's good for the United States," Wagner said.

"But increasingly, we found that people are going back. The U.S. has been lucky that many top scientists have stayed. But China has programs to attract them back to their homeland."

The study showed the returning scientists' value to China.

Overall, Wagner and her colleagues found that 12 percent of studies published by researchers in China were by those who had worked in other countries - and that is probably an underestimation, she said.

More importantly, those who worked abroad and returned to China published more high-impact research than scientists who didn't work abroad, according to the study.

"Once they go home, those who worked elsewhere are more productive at the international level than people who stayed in China," she said.

One reason for the success of the mobile researchers was that they published more studies with foreign-based collaborators. In previous research, Wagner has found that the more open a country is to cross-country scientific cooperation, the stronger its scientific impact.

That's also one reason why China is fine with the fact that many of its scientists stay in the United States, Europe or elsewhere.

"Chinese leaders value the connections. It is a way to create linkages with the worldwide scientific community," she said.

A variety of indicators suggest that China's science and technology capabilities are on a sharply rising trajectory. For one, China's spending on research and development as tracked by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has increased faster than overall economic growth in the country.

And by one measure, China ranked second in the world in the number of papers published in indexed scientific journals in 2017.

Wagner said that returning scientists have helped build China's scientific community, which in turns attracts more of the country's scientists to come back home. But she said it is still in America's best interest to try to retain as many of China's best scholars as possible, and be welcoming to those who visit.

"The U.S. has retained its dynamism in science and technology because excellent scientists from other countries come here," she said.

"If we lose that attraction, if we discourage people from coming here, it will take a toll on the U.S. scientific system."
-end-
Co-authors on the study were Cong Cao of the University of Nottingham Ningbo China; Jeroen Baas of Elsevier and its International Center for the Study of Research in The Netherlands; and Koen Jonkers of the Joint Research Centre, European Commission, in Belgium.

Contact: Caroline Wagner, Wagner.911@osu.edu

Written by Jeff Grabmeier, 614-292-8457; Grabmeier.1@osu.edu

Ohio State University

Related Technology Articles:

October issue SLAS Technology now available
The October issue of SLAS Technology features the cover article, 'Role of Digital Microfl-uidics in Enabling Access to Laboratory Automation and Making Biology Programmable' by Varun B.
Robot technology for everyone or only for the average person?
Robot technology is being used more and more in health rehabilitation and in working life.
Novel biomarker technology for cancer diagnostics
A new way of identifying cancer biomarkers has been developed by researchers at Lund University in Sweden.
Technology innovation for neurology
TU Graz researcher Francesco Greco has developed ultra-light tattoo electrodes that are hardly noticeable on the skin and make long-term measurements of brain activity cheaper and easier.
April's SLAS Technology is now available
April's Edition of SLAS Technology Features Cover Article, 'CURATE.AI: Optimizing Personalized Medicine with Artificial Intelligence'.
Technology in higher education: learning with it instead of from it
Technology has shifted the way that professors teach students in higher education.
Post-lithium technology
Next-generation batteries will probably see the replacement of lithium ions by more abundant and environmentally benign alkali metal or multivalent ions.
Rethinking the role of technology in the classroom
Introducing tablets and laptops to the classroom has certain educational virtues, according to Annahita Ball, an assistant professor in the University at Buffalo School of Social Work, but her research suggests that tech has its limitations as well.
The science and technology of FAST
The Five hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST), located in a radio quiet zone, with the targets (e.g., radio pulsars and neutron stars, galactic and extragalactic 21-cm HI emission).
AI technology could help protect water supplies
Progress on new artificial intelligence (AI) technology could make monitoring at water treatment plants cheaper and easier and help safeguard public health.
More Technology News and Technology Current Events

Trending Science News

Current Coronavirus (COVID-19) News

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2020.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Listen Again: The Power Of Spaces
How do spaces shape the human experience? In what ways do our rooms, homes, and buildings give us meaning and purpose? This hour, TED speakers explore the power of the spaces we make and inhabit. Guests include architect Michael Murphy, musician David Byrne, artist Es Devlin, and architect Siamak Hariri.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#576 Science Communication in Creative Places
When you think of science communication, you might think of TED talks or museum talks or video talks, or... people giving lectures. It's a lot of people talking. But there's more to sci comm than that. This week host Bethany Brookshire talks to three people who have looked at science communication in places you might not expect it. We'll speak with Mauna Dasari, a graduate student at Notre Dame, about making mammals into a March Madness match. We'll talk with Sarah Garner, director of the Pathologists Assistant Program at Tulane University School of Medicine, who takes pathology instruction out of...
Now Playing: Radiolab

What If?
There's plenty of speculation about what Donald Trump might do in the wake of the election. Would he dispute the results if he loses? Would he simply refuse to leave office, or even try to use the military to maintain control? Last summer, Rosa Brooks got together a team of experts and political operatives from both sides of the aisle to ask a slightly different question. Rather than arguing about whether he'd do those things, they dug into what exactly would happen if he did. Part war game part choose your own adventure, Rosa's Transition Integrity Project doesn't give us any predictions, and it isn't a referendum on Trump. Instead, it's a deeply illuminating stress test on our laws, our institutions, and on the commitment to democracy written into the constitution. This episode was reported by Bethel Habte, with help from Tracie Hunte, and produced by Bethel Habte. Jeremy Bloom provided original music. Support Radiolab by becoming a member today at Radiolab.org/donate.     You can read The Transition Integrity Project's report here.