Articles tagged with Scientific Consensus
The American Meteorological Society and partners urge reinstatement of climate science chapter in judicial reference manual, citing concerns over public access to scientific knowledge. The statement emphasizes the overwhelming agreement among experts on climate change, its impacts, and human activities as primary drivers.
The American Meteorological Society strongly opposes the dismantling of NCAR, highlighting its central role in atmospheric sciences and its impact on the nation's economy. The AMS recommends that NSF engage in a rigorous process to develop a strategy for enhancing scientific innovation in the weather enterprise.
The American Meteorological Society (AMS) expresses deep concern over the repeal of the EPA's 2009 Endangerment Finding, which concluded that greenhouse gas emissions harm human health and well-being. AMS reaffirms key scientific conclusions on climate change, including its impacts on people and nature.
A Cochrane review found no significant effect of calcium supplementation on pre-eclampsia, contradicting long-held assumptions. The review excluded small and unreliable studies that previously suggested benefits of calcium supplementation.
The American Meteorological Society (AMS) has released a statement highlighting five foundational flaws in the Department of Energy's 2025 Climate Synthesis report. These flaws are inconsistent with scientific principles and practices, and require rectification before the report can accurately characterize scientific understanding.
Elaine R. Mardis, Alexis B. Carter, and Dara L. Aisner receive AMP's top honors for groundbreaking work in cancer genomics and molecular diagnostics. Drs. Mardis and Carter will deliver keynote lectures at the AMP Annual Meeting & Expo.
A recent study found that emphasizing the scientific consensus on climate change can clear up misperceptions and strengthen beliefs about its existence and causes. Researchers surveyed over 10,500 people across 27 countries and observed a similar response to the consensus message.
The Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior (SNEB) has issued a position paper emphasizing the importance of emergency-related food and nutrition education before, during, and after disasters. The paper highlights challenges in accessing safe, nutritious foods and beverages in post-disaster situations, particularly among historica...
This study found that research globalization has led to a decline in the efficiency of producing Nobel Prize-level topics since 2000. The standardization of research topics has reduced this efficiency, suggesting that globalization drives homogenization. Japan can inform its research policy based on these findings.
A scoping review of 508 clinical studies found that most define a low-carb diet as limiting carbohydrate intake to 30% or less, with some using thresholds below 100 grams per day. The study highlights the need for a standardized definition to inform public health and nutrition activities.
The American College of Radiology has issued a joint statement with four other radiology societies to address the development and use of AI tools in radiology. The statement emphasizes the need for increased monitoring of AI utility and safety, advocating for collaboration among developers, clinicians, purchasers, and regulators.
The Canadian Cardiovascular Society has updated its guidelines to no longer recommend routine daily aspirin use for primary prevention of heart attacks or death. However, daily aspirin may be considered for people with high risk factors for heart attack, such as diabetes, high cholesterol, and smoking. The new guidelines emphasize the ...
A study by UNIGE researchers found that six psychological interventions had a small and temporary impact in preventing the spread of climate misinformation. The interventions targeted factors such as trust in climate scientists, transparency, and accuracy, but only one group showed a slight advantage in resisting disinformation.
A new classification system for heart attacks based on heart muscle damage is released, offering a more differentiated definition and improving understanding of acute atherothrombotic MI. This system has the potential to stratify risk more accurately and lay the groundwork for development of injury-stage-specific therapies.
The new guideline provides guidance on the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy and conduction system pacing in patients with indications for pacemakers or heart failure. The authors emphasize the importance of shared decision-making between providers and patients, and highlight areas for future research.
A new analysis of a 45,000-65,000 year old fossil mandible from Spain suggests it may be the earliest documented presence of Homo sapiens in Europe, rather than a Neandertal. The study used CT scanning and 3D modeling to analyze the fossil's shape and features, finding that it shared characteristics with both humans and Neandertals.
Recent research suggests that racial prejudice within communities predicts the militarization of local police departments. In contrast, communicating scientific consensus appears to be an effective way to change factual beliefs about contested science topics. Additionally, studies have found that happy people tend to overestimate their...
A PSU study found that people with extreme anti-scientific attitudes tend to be overconfident in their knowledge of the issue. As attitudes diverge from scientific consensus, actual knowledge decreases, while perceived knowledge increases. This pattern holds true for issues like climate change, vaccination, and genetically modified foods.
A new study suggests that science reporting on climate change can lead to more accurate beliefs and support government action, but these effects are short-lived. Researchers found that factually accurate science reporting changed people's factual understanding and moved their political preferences towards supporting climate action.
Illinois Tech philosopher J.D. Trout argues that journalists should prioritize settled science and dismiss 'alternative facts' as cons. He suggests that reporters should not engage with disputed claims when the scientific consensus is clear, and instead promote epistemic humility and respect for expert knowledge.
The American Society for Nutrition hosted a live virtual debate on the concept of ultra-processed foods, with leading scientists presenting arguments for and against incorporating it into dietary guidelines. Research suggests that consumption of ultra-processed foods is linked to weight gain and increased risk of chronic diseases.
A recent survey of 88,125 climate-related studies found that 99.9% support human-caused climate change, with only four skeptical papers out of 3,000 examined. The study's findings provide strong evidence for the reality of human influence on climate, allaying any remaining doubt.
The conference, INGSA2021, aims to strengthen global coordination in science advice and promote open science. Key findings include the importance of digital technologies and AI in reshaping the profession and the need for partnerships to drive economic and social development.
A new report by the University of Cincinnati suggests that large majorities of American news audiences care about climate change and want more information on the topic. The study found that fewer than 20% of Americans in these news audiences feel 'very well informed' about climate change.
A study by University of California - Berkeley researchers finds that the New York Times' climate change coverage often fails to present basic facts about global warming, including its causes, effects, and permanence. This lack of fact-based reporting can lead to public confusion and skepticism.
A new study found that Canada's high school curricula often fail to provide a comprehensive understanding of climate change, including its causes and consequences. The research highlights the need for accurate and scientifically-based climate education to prepare the next generation of Canadians to address this pressing issue.
A new study found that Republicans are more persuasive than scientists in correcting misinformation about climate change, despite being associated with denial. The researchers suggest that citing Republican elites endorsing the scientific consensus may be an effective way to persuade citizens.
Experts argue that campaigns focusing on climate science consensus are likely to backfire and fuel debate rather than promoting policy efforts. The messaging strategy promotes confusion over the extent of consensus and has an uncertain evidence-base.
Researchers found that Republicans are less likely to conform to the scientific consensus on global warming when temperatures are extreme, while Democrats are more likely to attribute it to human activity. Temperature anomalies exacerbate existing political polarization and partisan differences over global warming beliefs.
A new study suggests that a 'psychological vaccine' can help build tolerance to climate change misinformation, shifting opinions closer to the truth. Researchers found that pre-exposing people to small amounts of misinformation can provide resistance against subsequent exposure.
A study by Michigan State University sociologist Aaron M. McCright found that US residents who believe in the scientific consensus on global warming are more willing to support government action to curb emissions, even among Republicans and conservatives.
A study by Michigan State University researcher Aaron M. McCright found that Democrats generally believe in global warming more now than they did 10 years ago, while Republicans increasingly deny its existence. The gap between these groups has increased over the past decade, hindering meaningful national energy policies.
A recent study by Yale University law professor Dan Kahan and others found that scientific consensus on issues like climate change and nuclear waste disposal is not enough to persuade people with competing cultural values. Instead, individuals tend to evaluate expert opinions based on their own cultural predispositions.