A high-carbohydrate kibble diet and a low-carbohydrate raw meat-based diet have markedly different effects on dogs’ energy metabolism, according to a new study carried out by the DogRisk research group at the University of Helsinki.
In the study, 46 Staffordshire Bull Terriers were fed either kibble or a raw food diet for an average of 4.5 months. The kibble diet was rich in non-fiber carbohydrates, while the raw food diet was high in fat and contained no non-fiber carbohydrates. Researchers measured several biomarkers before and after the trial, including blood sugar, insulin, cholesterol, triglycerides, ketone bodies, and bodyweight.
Significant key findings of the study are:
“Interestingly, the kibble diet was associated with changes often linked to adverse metabolic health, while the raw food diet promoted metabolic responses generally considered favorable,” said Dr. Sarah Holm , DVM and PhD, the study’s lead researcher from the DogRisk research group at the Faculty of Veterinary medicine, University of Helsinki. “More research is needed to understand the long-term health implications of these two feeding strategies.”
Dr. Anna Hielm-Björkman , DVM and docent, who leads the DogRisk group, added: “This is a great example of One Health research. Our findings reflect similar, and sometimes controversial, human studies suggesting that fat-rich diets actually lower cholesterol and triglycerides, while carbohydrate-rich diets raise blood lipids and long-term blood sugar – a known precursor to type 2 diabetes in humans.”
The study highlights the potential of using dogs as models for human metabolic research and opens the door for further investigation into how diet affects health across species.
The Veterinary Journal
The effect of a kibble diet versus a raw meat-based diet on energy metabolism biomarkers in dogs
8-Oct-2025