Tsukuba, Japan—Clinical trials for cancer drugs have three stages, Phase I-III, before marketing, each with different evaluation items. However, there is no consensus on the appropriateness of evaluation criteria for early-stage clinical trials of brain tumor drugs compared with other solid tumors because brain tumors require unique biomarkers and complex evaluations. Therefore, the appropriateness of criteria for evaluating therapeutic agents is less well understood for brain tumors than that for other solid tumors.
This study analyzed the endpoints in recent Phase I trials of brain tumor drugs. The researchers found that multiple efficacy endpoints, such as overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, were evaluated in an exploratory manner. In addition, the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors were used more frequently than other criteria in a statistical Phase I examination cohort including brain tumors and other solid tumors. These findings indicate that evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic agents is more difficult in early-stage examinations of brain tumors than in those of other solid tumors, requiring multidimensional evaluation criteria and the accumulation of detailed prognostic data. To collect evidence based on the WHO brain tumor guidelines, the efficacy endpoints in early trials must be further analyzed using information in various databases.
###
This research was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (grant number JP23mk0101235).
Title of original paper:
Recent status of Phase I clinical trials for brain tumors: a regulatory science study of exploratory efficacy endpoints
Journal:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
DOI:
10.1007/s43441-024-00644-3
Assistant Professor WATANABE, Shinya
Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Recent Status of Phase I Clinical Trials for Brain Tumors: A Regulatory Science Study of Exploratory Efficacy Endpoints
26-Mar-2024