Arsenic contamination in rice is a growing food safety concern in Asia. A new study presents a cost-effective, sustainable solution using silicon extracted from rice husks. By applying silicon both to the soil and as a foliar spray during the rice’s reproductive stage, researchers achieved a substantial reduction in arsenic accumulation in grains. The combined approach not only enhanced silicon uptake but also reprogrammed plant responses—strengthening root barriers and dialing down arsenic transport genes. The results from both pot and field trials reveal a powerful synergy between root and foliar applications, offering a practical strategy to reduce arsenic exposure through rice consumption.
Paddy fields across Asia are facing a silent threat—arsenic contamination that makes its way into rice grains. Silicon plays a dual role in rice physiology: it's essential for plant health and also competes with arsenic for uptake pathways. However, decades of harvesting without silicon replenishment have drained the soils of this crucial element. While commercial silicon fertilizers exist, they are often too costly for widespread use. Meanwhile, rice husks—rich in silicon and often discarded—remain an untapped resource. Due to these challenges, researchers are seeking innovative ways to turn agricultural waste into a defense mechanism against arsenic toxicity in rice.
In a study (DOI: 10.1016/j.pedsph.2024.05.009) published in Pedosphere on June 20, 2025, scientists from Hunan Normal University and the University of Massachusetts Amherst introduced a new two-step approach to tackle arsenic contamination in rice. The method combines soil enrichment with combusted rice husk (CRH) and foliar spraying of husk-derived silicon at the rice plant’s reproductive stage. Through pot and field experiments, the team demonstrated that this synergistic method significantly reduces arsenic uptake and grain accumulation, particularly in high-risk, arsenic-laden fields. The findings offer a compelling strategy to improve food safety using affordable, waste-based materials.
The research team designed a dual application system to target rice’s critical growth period. In controlled pot trials, they first amended soil with CRH—a slow-release silicon source—and followed up with a foliar spray just before the reproductive stage. This timing was crucial: arsenic uptake spikes when soil silicon naturally dips. The results were striking. Compared to soil application alone, the combined method reduced root-surface arsenic by 51% and grain arsenic by 28%. These reductions were linked to stronger root suberization, diminished root oxidation capacity, and a 91% suppression in Lsi6 , a key gene regulating arsenic transport.
In field experiments, the approach held strong. In soils with high arsenic levels (60–80 mg/kg), only the dual application brought grain arsenic below China’s food safety threshold. By contrast, foliar application alone sometimes exacerbated arsenic uptake. Interestingly, the foliar spray used just 0.5% of the silicon dose compared to the soil treatment, hinting at a signaling role beyond nutrient supplementation. The study underscores that timing, dosage, and delivery method all matter—and together, they can make rice safer to eat even under contaminated conditions.
“Rice is uniquely vulnerable to arsenic because it absorbs it through the same channels as silicon,” explained Dr. Xin Wang, lead author of the study. “By synchronizing silicon delivery to match the plant’s needs, we’re not just supplementing nutrients—we’re reprogramming how the plant handles arsenic. Our dual strategy strengthens the root barrier and redirects arsenic away from the grain. It’s a simple, scalable fix rooted in agricultural waste that could change how we manage rice safety.”
This two-pronged approach presents a promising, farmer-friendly solution for managing arsenic in rice. By repurposing rice husks—a widely available agricultural byproduct—the strategy turns waste into a valuable input for crop safety. Its low cost and ease of application make it especially appealing for regions where commercial silicon fertilizers are out of reach. Moving forward, researchers aim to refine the production of combusted husk to reduce carbon emissions and improve scalability. With further testing, this method could be adapted to other crops and regions, offering a replicable model for mitigating heavy metal contamination in global food systems.
###
References
DOI
Original Source URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedsph.2024.05.009
Funding information
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42377024), the Aid Program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province, China, and the Key Project of Developmental Biology and Breeding from Hunan Province of China (No. 2022XKQ0207).
About Pedosphere
Pedosphere is a peer-reviewed international journal established in 1991 and published bimonthly in English by Elsevier and Science Press. It is jointly sponsored by the Soil Science Society of China and the Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, in collaboration with five leading Chinese institutions in soil science. Under the editorship of Prof. Shen Ren-Fang, the journal publishes high-quality original research and reviews spanning the full spectrum of soil science, including environmental science, agriculture, ecology, bioscience, and geoscience. Topics of interest include soil physics, chemistry, biology, fertility, plant nutrition, conservation, and global change. All submissions undergo rigorous double-blind peer review by an international editorial board and expert panel. Pedosphere is indexed in major databases such as SCI Expanded, SCOPUS, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, and CNKI, making it a widely recognized platform for advancing soil science research globally.
Pedosphere
Not applicable
Mitigation of arsenic uptake and accumulation in rice grains by applying husk-derived silicon in a synergistic way: Evidence from pot and field trials
21-May-2026
The authors declare that they have no competing interests