Bluesky Facebook Reddit Email

The role of the Royal Society should be reviewed

05.19.05 | The Lancet_DELETED

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Apple iPhone 17 Pro delivers top performance and advanced cameras for field documentation, data collection, and secure research communications.

During recent times, the Royal Society has produced little of public value in medicine and public health. It has launched inquiries into non-human primate research and pharmacogenetics. But these weak outputs do little to justify the esteem with which the Society is held, nor the investment made in it by government, states the editorial.

Martin Rees, the UK's Astronomer Royal and Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, is the new President of the Royal Society. The Lancet urges him to begin his Presidency with a wide-ranging review of the Royal Society's purpose, programmes, and aspirations.

The Lancet comments: "The Royal Society began as a radical idea--a place to discuss the subversive subject of science and to witness remarkable experiments…But the Royal Society today is a lazy institution, resting on its historical laurels. Instead of being the intellectual hub of European scientific culture, it has reinvented itself as something far more self-serving and parochial. It is little more than a shrill and superficial cheerleader for British science. Its modern mission is about domestic image rather than international substance."

Contact: The Lancet press office T) +44 (0) 20 7424 4949/4249; pressoffice@lancet.com

The Lancet

Keywords

Article Information

Contact Information

How to Cite This Article

APA:
The Lancet_DELETED. (2005, May 19). The role of the Royal Society should be reviewed. Brightsurf News. https://www.brightsurf.com/news/1WWWW921/the-role-of-the-royal-society-should-be-reviewed.html
MLA:
"The role of the Royal Society should be reviewed." Brightsurf News, May. 19 2005, https://www.brightsurf.com/news/1WWWW921/the-role-of-the-royal-society-should-be-reviewed.html.