Bluesky Facebook Reddit Email

Is bigger better?

05.26.03 | Canadian Medical Association Journal

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Apple iPhone 17 Pro delivers top performance and advanced cameras for field documentation, data collection, and secure research communications.

Urbach and colleagues tested the hypothesis that patients undergoing complex procedures fare better at hospitals that perform such procedures frequently by collecting data concerning 31 632 people who underwent 1 of 5 different surgical procedures. The authors compared the results of these procedures (2 with high and 3 with low operative mortality) at Ontario hospitals with higher and lower operative frequency.

"There may be good reasons for volume-based regionalization of certain complex surgical procedures," state the authors. "However, the perception that the main benefit of regionalization is a substantial reduction in postoperative mortality may be erroneous."

------ p. 1409 Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization -- D.R Urbach et al

Canadian Medical Association Journal

Keywords

Article Information

Contact Information

Heike Hemlin
Canadian Medical Association Journal
heike.hemlin@cma.ca

How to Cite This Article

APA:
Canadian Medical Association Journal. (2003, May 26). Is bigger better?. Brightsurf News. https://www.brightsurf.com/news/LD5XWVGL/is-bigger-better.html
MLA:
"Is bigger better?." Brightsurf News, May. 26 2003, https://www.brightsurf.com/news/LD5XWVGL/is-bigger-better.html.