An SDL integrates an AI doing the experiment planning with lab automation and robotics. In the race to develop better materials, AI and SDLs are often celebrated for one main reason: speed.
These systems can rapidly test and optimize new materials, helping researchers find improved solutions in a fraction of the usual time. But critics have raised important concerns: If AI simply delivers better results without explaining why they work, is this still true scientific progress and how can we control reliability?
A new study published in ACS Catalysis by our Institute’s Theory Department, in collaboration with BASF, and BasCat – UniCat BASF JointLab, shows that speed does not need to compromise understanding. The team developed an advanced AI-driven strategy that not only accelerates catalyst discovery, but also reveals why the identified materials perform better. This approach was successfully demonstrated on a key industrial reaction: the conversion of propane into propylene, an essential building block of the chemical industry and starting material for a wide range of everyday products, including plastics and synthetic fibers.
Most current AI-driven discovery approaches focus on identifying a single best material as quickly as possible. In doing so, they often act as “black boxes”, producing answers without explanations. While this can be useful for optimization, it leaves scientists with limited understanding of the underlying chemistry. Here, a different approach was taken: by carefully designing how AI explores possible material combinations, improved performance was achieved while simultaneously providing meaningful insights: a strategy referred to as “gray-box,” making the process more transparent and controllable.
Beyond rapidly identifying a catalyst superior to the current industry reference, the approach translated the improved performance into a language understandable to chemists. It highlighted the effect of individual promoters contained in the identified catalyst, and especially synergistic interactions between them that were missed in previous traditional studies. At the same time, the method remained highly efficient: less than 50 experiments were needed to search a design space containing more than 10 13 aka 10000000000000 possible promoter combinations.
Overall, the study demonstrates that AI and automation in chemistry do not have to come at the expense of understanding. Thoughtfully designed, these technologies are capable of transforming materials development – moving from simply finding better solutions to truly understanding them. Ultimately, this will position AI as an agentic partner in scientific discovery rather than just an efficient, but barely assessable tool.
ACS Catalysis
Experimental study
Adaptive Experiment Planning for Inverse Design and Understanding: Synergistic Interactions as Key to Optimized Multi-Promoter Formulations
19-Mar-2026