Add BrightSurf on Google Email

Scientists discover hazardous waste-eating bacteria

Researchers have discovered bacteria that can survive in highly alkaline conditions expected in radioactive waste disposal sites and use isosaccharinic acid as a food source. These microbes may prevent the release of toxic radionuclides into the environment, offering a potential solution for safe nuclear waste disposal.

SourceUniversity of Manchester·JournalThe ISME Journal·DateSep 9, 2014

Researchers grapple with UK's nuclear legacy

A £8 million project at the University of Leeds is developing new technologies to handle different types of spent fuels, packaging and storing waste, and dealing with nuclear sludges. The research consortium brings together academics, industry experts, and government advisors to tackle Britain's nuclear legacy.

Radioactive waste: Where to put it?

Geologists are exploring shales as a potential site for America's spent nuclear fuel, with some formations showing natural groundwater pressure anomalies that can be analyzed on a large scale. A new computer model is also being developed to evaluate the behavior of various forms of nuclear waste and waste containers in different rocks.

Where to put nuclear waste?

Researchers found affluent men more likely to accept nuclear waste storage sites than women or economically disadvantaged individuals. The team analyzed local opinions on a Finnish nuclear waste repository and identified a 'white male effect,' highlighting the need for a more holistic approach to community involvement.

SourceInderscience Publishers·JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Technology and Management·DateJun 19, 2012

Nuclear waste requires cradle-to-grave strategy

Countries with nuclear power programs need a medium-term strategy for spent fuel storage, according to Allison Macfarlane. The disposal of high-level nuclear waste is possible, but planning ahead is crucial to ensure public safety and sustainability.

SourceSAGE·JournalBulletin of the Atomic Scientists·DateJul 1, 2011

Tapping titanium's colorful potential

A cost-effective method for coloring titanium using an electrochemical solution has been developed, enabling over 80 shades of basic colors and crack-free stability. The technology has potential applications in various industries, including healthcare, aviation, and the military.

SourceQueen's University·JournalACS Applied Materials & Interfaces·DateJun 28, 2011

Addressing the nuclear waste issue

Researchers use Closterium moniliferum algae to remove strontium, a major component of nuclear waste, by sequestering it in solid crystals. The algae's ability to differentiate between strontium and calcium can help isolate highly radioactive 'high-level' waste from 'low-level' waste.

SourceNorthwestern University·JournalChemSusChem·DateApr 4, 2011

A Venus flytrap for nuclear waste

Researchers at Northwestern University have developed a new material that permanently traps only the desired radioactive ion, cesium, from a sodium-heavy solution. The synthetic material, made from layers of a gallium, sulfur and antimony compound, sequesters 100% of the cesium ions while ignoring all the sodium ions.

SourceNorthwestern University·JournalNature Chemistry·DateJan 26, 2010

Strange travels

Research focuses on transport phenomena in heterogeneous media, exploring anomalous transport and its role in hydrogeology. The study highlights the importance of concentration tails in assessing radioactive waste disposal reliability.

SourceSoil Science Society of America·JournalVadose Zone Journal·DateDec 17, 2008

New material can find a needle in a nuclear waste haystack

A team of Northwestern University chemists has developed a new metal sulfide material, KMS-1, that can effectively remove strontium, a major component of nuclear waste, by exploiting its unique properties. The material works across the pH scale and outperforms existing methods in terms of selectivity and efficiency.

SourceNorthwestern University·JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences·DateMar 3, 2008

Safety of nuclear waste disposal site

University of Michigan professor Rodney Ewing argues that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's method for assessing the Yucca Mountain site's safety is flawed due to large uncertainties. He proposes a more comprehensive approach by evaluating independent barriers, such as canisters and rock layers, to ensure the site's long-term safety.

People Power Over Nuclear Issues

Professor Lynda Warren argues that local residents' opinions are distorted by political rhetoric and underestimated by the industry. She calls for increased transparency and involvement from politicians and companies to address public fears about radioactive waste.

SourceInstitute of Materials·JournalInterdisciplinary Science Reviews·DateFeb 1, 1999

Nuclear Safer Than Coal?

According to Professor Bernard Cohen, nuclear power plants emit fewer carcinogens and pollutants compared to coal burning power stations. This results in a much lower fatality rate, with air pollution from coal causing 25 fatalities per minute versus only 0.018 for nuclear.

SourceInstitute of Materials·JournalInterdisciplinary Science Reviews·DateJan 27, 1999