Articles tagged with Climate Policy
Researchers found that carbon-reduction policies can lead to significant health savings, with benefits ranging from 26% to 10.5 times the cost of implementation. A transportation policy was the most expensive option, costing over $1 trillion in 2006 dollars, while a clean energy standard fell between the costs of other policies.
Researchers argue that IPCC's approval process limits its credibility by not considering diverse policy views. By analyzing global emissions data, they show how different interpretations can be made from the same dataset, highlighting the need for a more connected scientific-policy interface.
New research from Carnegie Institution scientists highlights the need for policy decisions based on sound science, rather than anecdotal information about local weather. The study finds that even as extreme weather events influence public opinion and support for climate change mitigation, waiting for people to experience these conditio...
A new study by IIASA researchers suggests that delaying climate policies could lead to up to 37% of global investment in coal power plants being stranded, with China and India bearing most of the costs. The study explores strategies to reduce stranded capacity, including avoiding new plant construction, shifting to other power sources,...
The EU's unilateral leadership in reducing greenhouse gases can limit the 2-degree target overshoot to 0.2-0.4°C, with lower costs for late-comers who delay action but face higher transitional challenges once they decarbonize. Carbon leakage is estimated to be small.
A new study finds that emissions pricing revenues could be at least twice as high as the estimated profit losses for fossil fuel owners. Climate policies would reduce demand and lower prices, generating strong incentives to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions.
A new study finds that delaying climate policy could lead to increased short-term mitigation costs, higher energy prices, and reduced emission reductions. If climate policies are delayed beyond 2030, global energy price levels may increase by 80% in the short term.
Researchers found that open-minded people became more supportive of government intervention after viewing videos presenting both sides of the issue. Closed-minded individuals did not change their views, regardless of the messages they received. The study suggests climate change denialists may be less effective in swaying public opinion.
Canadian governments must work together to share greenhouse gas emissions reduction costs, with provinces contributing equally. The current system is not effective and requires leadership from the Prime Minister and provincial premiers to address the challenge.
Scientists from six countries emphasize the importance of collaboration between science and policy in addressing air pollution effects. Successful integration has led to significant improvements in reducing acid rain and eutrophication, but challenges persist, including nitrogen emissions and climate change.
A recent study by Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research found that restricting nuclear power has minimal effect on the cost of climate policies. The researchers discovered that early retirement of nuclear power plants would lead to cumulative global GDP losses amounting to around 10-20 percent of climate policy costs.
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' special issue reviews 2011's top threats, including Iran's nuclear program, Fukushima's aftermath, and a growing partisan divide in US climate policy. The Doomsday Clock Symposium evaluates the world's progress on biological threats and nuclear disarmament.
A recent survey found near unanimous agreement among climate scientists on human-caused global warming, but many Americans believe most scientists disagree. This misperception reduces certainty about global warming and climate policy support. Correcting this misunderstanding is crucial to addressing the issue.
The article finds that integrating climate policy with energy sustainability objectives can lead to significant synergies and cost savings. By adopting an integrated approach, major benefits can be achieved in terms of reduced carbon emissions and improved air quality.
Recent presidential and congressional elections reveal a correlation between climate change policy stances and electoral success. Voters favor candidates taking 'green' positions on climate change, while those expressing skepticism lose support.
Research highlights the importance of supporting Inuit community institutions in adapting to climate change, fostering resilience through community-led initiatives and preserving traditional knowledge. Community resource centers like Ilisaqsivik play a vital role in connecting local voices to resources and decision-making processes.
Leading climate economist William Nordhaus advocates for carbon taxes as a means to achieve significant emissions reductions, citing economic inefficiency and ineffectiveness of cap-and-trade systems. A carbon tax could also provide a revenue source to curb budget deficits while meeting environmental objectives.
Professor Maxwell Boykoff warns that mass media amplifies extreme claims and presents them as equal to scientific data, distracting from critical issues. He argues that a more nuanced approach is needed to address climate change skepticism.
A study published in The Lancet suggests that policies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions can have additional positive effects on population health, beyond those related to climate change mitigation. These 'co-benefits' can provide a rationale for pursuing mitigation strategies and may also lead to cost savings for countries.
A new analysis by MIT researchers reveals that even moderate carbon-reduction policies can substantially lower the risk of future climate change. To avoid a 2 degree Celsius temperature increase, global emissions reductions are required now to provide a good chance of stabilizing the climate.
The British Climate Act is deemed flawed, with no one knowing how fast a major economy can decarbonize. Experts argue that policy should focus on developing clean technologies rather than setting unobtainable targets.
A new EU report emphasizes the importance of integrating climate change policies with economic and social issues to achieve effective climate action. The study assesses the degree of climate policy integration in six European countries, revealing significant potential for improvement.
A study published in Decision Analysis warns that long-term climate change policy is likely to change slowly, requiring stronger short-term goals. The researcher argues that considering path dependence in decision-making justifies greater near-term emissions reductions as a hedging strategy.
Purdue University researchers have proposed a way to incorporate deforestation into the international climate change treaty, titled Preservation Pathway. This approach would provide carbon credits for developing countries that set aside existing forests and slow deforestation rates.
Future US federal climate change policy is likely to include a national carbon dioxide cap, mandatory renewable energy portfolio standards, and increased vehicle fleet gasoline efficiency standards. These policies are already being implemented in the public and private sectors, with identifiable constituencies of well-networked actors.
A new report highlights the importance of ethics and justice in international climate negotiations, arguing that nations must acknowledge their duty to reduce emissions quickly and fairly. The report also calls for an end to using scientific uncertainty and national economic costs as justifications for not reducing emissions.
Experts from climate change, terrorism, sociology, politics, and geography come together to discuss how to effectively translate information into useful policy. The session aims to identify common issues with scientific content, weigh values, and communicate risk and science-based solutions to the public.
A new study by UI atmospheric scientists reveals a 54% chance that climate sensitivity exceeds the IPCC's upper bound, posing significant risks to humanity. The researchers propose an adaptive-decision strategy to mitigate uncertainty and facilitate robust climate-change policy.
A new study suggests that an adaptive-decision strategy can reduce costs and damages associated with climate change. By observing the climate system and making mid-course corrections, policymakers can make more reasonable and defensible choices about climate-change policy.
The RFF briefing papers provide topical, timely, and non-technical information and analysis on climate change policies. Key policy lessons and economic implications are outlined, including the role of economics in addressing climate change risks and costs.