Add BrightSurf on Google Email

Fear of death may factor into who we vote for

Researchers found that participants who were primed with thoughts of death were more likely to vote for John Kerry, while those who thought about their own mortality were more likely to support George W. Bush. The study suggests that mortality salience can influence political preference and worldview defense mechanisms.

SourceBlackwell Publishing Ltd.·JournalAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy·DateDec 21, 2005

Dartmouth professor warns of misuse of mapping technology in political redistricting

A Dartmouth professor warns that GIS technology can be used to manipulate election results, as state legislatures have incentives to use partisan information but few incentives to respect communities of interest. Nonpartisan redistricting commissions may offer a solution, but clear rules are needed to ensure fair representation.

SourceDartmouth College·JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences·DateOct 17, 2005

Lessons from 2004 point the way in 2008 election

According to Campbell, increased voter turnout was a key factor in the 2004 Republican victory. Nearly 60% of eligible voters participated, with competitive states experiencing higher turnout rates. The study also notes that party polarization and incumbent advantage will play significant roles in the 2008 election.

SourceUniversity at Buffalo·JournalPolitical Science Quarterly·DateAug 17, 2005

A baby face forecasts election outcomes

A study by Brandeis University researchers found that baby-faced individuals are often perceived as less competent than those with more mature features. Babyfaced adults, regardless of sex or ethnicity, share characteristics such as a round face, large eyes, and small chin, which can lead to overgeneralization and perceptions of naivet...

SourceBrandeis University·JournalScience·DateJun 9, 2005

Congress is not so easily 'bought'

A study published by the American Sociological Association finds that campaign contributions and lobbying have limited impact on policy, with party lines and ideology playing a greater role. The average PAC donation to candidates is $1,700, which is not enough to win significant influence.

SourceAmerican Sociological Association·Journalسياقات اللغة والدراسات البينية·DateJul 31, 2003

Think political news is biased? Depends who you ask

A new study by Ohio State University found that Republicans who frequently engage in political debates with others who share their views tend to have a more balanced perception of media bias. In contrast, Democrats' perceptions of media bias do not differ based on who they talk to. The study suggests that conversational contacts influe...

SourceOhio State University·JournalPolitical Psychology·DateApr 16, 2003

Call for WHO elections to be more open and transparent

A joint campaign between The Lancet and the Rockefeller Foundation aims to highlight critical issues in WHO's Director-General election, including a pressing need for leadership, funding reform, and prioritizing global health equity. The campaign seeks responses from candidates on key questions and calls for public scrutiny and debate.

SourceThe Lancet_DELETED·JournalThe Lancet·DateDec 5, 2002

In Close Elections, Small-State Voters Have Most Power, Columbia Statistician Tells Presidential Candidates

A study by Columbia University statistics professor Andrew Gelman and colleagues found that small-state voters have a higher probability of affecting the outcome of presidential races due to the electoral college system. In close national elections, vote tallies in politically balanced states are more likely to determine the outcome.

SourceColumbia University·JournalJournal of the American Statistical Association·DateMar 16, 1998