Add BrightSurf on Google Email

How much product information do consumers want?

A study published in Journal of Consumer Research found that people vary widely on the level of detail required for understanding a product. Explanation fiends require more details to feel informed, while explanation foes feel confident with superficial explanations. Understanding what consumers want is crucial for marketers.

SourceBrown University·JournalJournal of Consumer Research·DateSep 18, 2012

Glass shape influences how quickly we drink alcohol

Researchers at University of Bristol found that participants drank more slowly from curved 'beer flute' glasses than straight-sided glass containing lager, suggesting curved glasses compromise ability to gauge liquid levels and pace drinking. This could have positive impact on reducing intoxication and excessive drinking.

SourceUniversity of Bristol·JournalPLOS ONE·DateAug 31, 2012

Social identification, not obedience, might motivate unspeakable acts

Researchers propose a new explanation for Milgram's findings, suggesting that participants' behavior is driven by their patterns of social identification. Conditions that encouraged identification with the experimenter led to increased obedience, while conditions that encouraged identification with the learner led to decreased obedience.

SourceAssociation for Psychological Science·JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science·DateJul 18, 2012

Vampire jumping spiders identify victims by their antennae

Researchers discovered that vampire jumping spiders prefer female mosquitoes with blood-fed abdomens over other insects due to their distinctive antennae. The spiders can identify the females by their antennae even when they are too small to be seen, and this unique ability may play a crucial role in their prey classification process.

SourceThe Company of Biologists·JournalJournal of Experimental Biology·DateJun 7, 2012

MIT research: The power of being heard

A new study from MIT neuroscientists found that sharing stories about one's life with members of the opposing group improves attitudes and reduces prejudice. The benefits were greatest for members of the less empowered group, who reported improved attitudes towards the other group after sharing their own perspectives.

SourceMassachusetts Institute of Technology·JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology·DateMar 15, 2012

Finding it difficult to make a purchase? Try creating some distance from the problem

A new study published in the Journal of Consumer Research found that creating psychological distance can reduce cognitive difficulty and anxiety in choice situations. By manipulating abstract thinking and body postures, researchers discovered that leaning away from a screen or task can make decisions feel less difficult.

SourceUniversity of Chicago Press Journals·JournalJournal of Consumer Research·DateFeb 14, 2012

Time = money = less happiness, study from Rotman School of Management finds

A new study by Rotman School of Management researchers reveals that treating time as money can undermine well-being. The study shows individuals who perceive their time as monetizable tend to experience greater impatience and lower satisfaction during leisure activities compared to those who do not.

SourceUniversity of Toronto, Rotman School of Management·JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology·DateFeb 6, 2012

The illusion of courage: Why people mispredict their behavior in embarrassing situations

A study published in the Journal of Behavioral Decision Making found that people tend to overestimate their willingness to engage in embarrassing public performances. However, inducing immediate emotions can help reduce this illusion of courage. The research has practical implications for understanding human behavior and decision-making.

SourceCarnegie Mellon University·JournalJournal of Behavioral Decision Making·DateJan 17, 2012

Is there a dark side to moving in sync?

Two studies by USC Marshall School of Business professor Scott Wiltermuth found that synchronized physical activities can foster aggression and obedience, potentially leading to destructive outcomes. Participants who moved in sync with their groups or authority figures performed better in tasks that involved harming others.

SourceUSC Marshall School of Business·JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology·DateJan 10, 2012

Belief in God cuts two ways, study finds

A study by Kristin Laurin found that reminding people of God decreases their motivation to pursue personal goals, yet improves their ability to resist temptation. Participants who believed in an omniscient entity watching over them were more likely to resist temptations and achieve major life goals.

SourceAmerican Psychological Association·JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology·DateOct 27, 2011

A World Series to remember?

A new study published in Psychological Science found that fans of baseball teams tend to remember the games their teams won more than the ones they lost. The researchers discovered that positive experiences and social factors play a significant role in boosting memory for winning events.

SourceAssociation for Psychological Science·JournalPsychological Science·DateOct 25, 2011

Role of gender in workplace negotiations

A study by Columbia Business School researchers finds that women's lower negotiation outcomes are driven by heightened concerns about social backlash, rather than a lack of capability or motivation. To address this, training programs should focus on coaching role shifting and reframing self-advocacy as other-advocacy.

SourceColumbia Business School·JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology·DateSep 26, 2011

Study finds conformity does not equal cooperation

A study by academics at UEA found that people who do not conform are most likely to work together for the public good, while conforming to social norms can actually make people less likely to co-operate. Non-conformists were more willing to invest in a joint project when praised for their investment.

SourceUniversity of East Anglia·JournalPersonality and Individual Differences·DateAug 1, 2011

A glove on your hand can change your mind

Researchers found that using a ski glove to hinder motor fluency can reverse right-handers' judgments of good and bad, making them associate left with the 'right side' of space. This study suggests that people's conceptions of good and bad depend on their bodily experiences.

SourceMax-Planck-Gesellschaft·JournalPsychological Science·DateMar 10, 2011

The more secure you feel, the less you value your stuff, UNH research shows

A recent study from the University of New Hampshire found that individuals who feel more secure in their relationships place a lower monetary value on their possessions. This heightened sense of security can lead to decreased valuation of possessions, as people perceive them as already being protected by their loved ones.

SourceUniversity of New Hampshire·JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology·DateMar 3, 2011

Couples sometimes communicate no better than strangers

A recent study found that married couples and close friends may not communicate as well as they think. The researchers used an experiment to test this idea, finding that accuracy rates for spouses and strangers were statistically identical. Closeness can create the illusion of insight, leading to communication problems.

SourceUniversity of Chicago·JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology·DateJan 19, 2011

A second language gives toddlers an edge

Bilingual toddlers as young as 24 months exhibit comparable vocabulary in both languages and show cognitive advantages over unilingual peers. This early bilingual advantage is likely due to infants' experience with two languages, providing a competitive edge in executive functioning.

SourceConcordia University·JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology·DateJan 19, 2011

People think immoral behavior is funny -- but only if it also seems benign

A recent study published in Psychological Science found that people find humor in moral violations when they seem harmless or non-threatening. The researchers tested this theory by presenting volunteers with different scenarios and rewarding them with candy bars. They discovered that the situations involving a moral violation were more...

SourceAssociation for Psychological Science·JournalPsychological Science·DateAug 9, 2010

Touch: How a hard chair creates a hard heart

A Yale-led team of psychologists found that physical sensations can shape our thoughts and perceptions, leading to different behaviors towards others. The study demonstrated how dramatic the impact of touch can be on our interactions with job applicants, relationships, and negotiations.

SourceYale University·JournalScience·DateJun 24, 2010

Motivation by anticipation: Expecting rapid feedback enhances performance

A recent study published in Psychological Science found that students who expected to receive grades quickly performed better than those who anticipated delays. This counterintuitive result may be due to the threat of disappointment being more prominent for early expectants, leading them to perform better as a result. The study has imp...

SourceAssociation for Psychological Science·JournalPsychological Science·DateMar 30, 2010

Prayer increases forgiveness

A study published in Psychological Science found that directed prayer can spark forgiveness in both the person praying and their wronged partner. Praying for a close friend also increased selfless concern, which boosted forgiveness. The researchers believe prayer shifts attention from the self back to others, allowing resentments to fade.

SourceAssociation for Psychological Science·JournalPsychological Science·DateJan 27, 2010

Captured by true crime

Research in Social Psychological and Personality Science suggests that women's fascination with true crime stems from a desire to learn strategies for prevention and survival. The study found that women are more likely to be drawn to true crime books than men, as they seek to understand warning signs and escape tips.

SourceSAGE·JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science·DateJan 11, 2010