Bluesky Facebook Reddit Email

Trade-offs in REDD+ funds distribution

10.21.19 | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Aranet4 Home CO2 Monitor

Aranet4 Home CO2 Monitor tracks ventilation quality in labs, classrooms, and conference rooms with long battery life and clear e-ink readouts.

Models of the global effects of various fund allocation scenarios for the international program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) suggest that for a given level of emissions reduction, optimal biodiversity conservation can be achieved for only a moderate increase in cost; adding modest distributional equity targets does not significantly reduce the effect of a given amount of funding on carbon and biodiversity outcomes, but adding sufficiently ambitious equity targets does, according to the authors.

Article #19-08683: "Modeling trade-offs across carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and equity in the distribution of global REDD+ funds," by Ignacio Palomo et al.

MEDIA CONTACT: Ignacio Palomo, Basque Centre for Climate Change, Leioa, SPAIN; tel: +34-605-556-609; e-mail: ignacio.palomo@bc3research.org

###

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Keywords

Article Information

Contact Information

How to Cite This Article

APA:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (2019, October 21). Trade-offs in REDD+ funds distribution. Brightsurf News. https://www.brightsurf.com/news/14GJJ3NL/trade-offs-in-redd-funds-distribution.html
MLA:
"Trade-offs in REDD+ funds distribution." Brightsurf News, Oct. 21 2019, https://www.brightsurf.com/news/14GJJ3NL/trade-offs-in-redd-funds-distribution.html.