Add BrightSurf on Google Email

Biomedical and life science articles by female researchers spend longer under review

01.20.26 | PLOS

Women are underrepresented in academia, especially in STEMM fields, at top institutions, and in senior positions. This study analyzes millions of biomedical and life science articles, revealing that female-authored articles spend longer under review than comparable male-authored articles, across most fields.


In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available paper in PLOS Biology : https://plos.io/3KIf8CF

Article title: Biomedical and life science articles by female researchers spend longer under review

Author countries : United States

Funding: This work was partially funded by a Data Analytics grant (to D.A.P.) funded by the “Harnessing the Data Revolution for Fire Science” project ( https://hdrfs.epscorspo.nevada.edu) , which is funded by grant OIA-2148788 from the National Science Foundation ( https://www.nsf.gov) . The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

PLOS Biology

10.1371/journal.pbio.3003574

Meta-analysis

Not applicable

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Keywords

Article Information

Contact Information

Claire Turner
PLOS
biologypress@plos.org

How to Cite This Article

APA:
PLOS. (2026, January 20). Biomedical and life science articles by female researchers spend longer under review. Brightsurf News. https://www.brightsurf.com/news/19NQRR01/biomedical-and-life-science-articles-by-female-researchers-spend-longer-under-review.html
MLA:
"Biomedical and life science articles by female researchers spend longer under review." Brightsurf News, Jan. 20 2026, https://www.brightsurf.com/news/19NQRR01/biomedical-and-life-science-articles-by-female-researchers-spend-longer-under-review.html.