Uveal melanoma is a rare and aggressive cancer that starts inside the eye and often spreads to the liver. Few treatment options exist, and unlike some forms of skin melanoma which can respond well to modern therapies, metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) remains difficult to treat.
Now, a team of Thomas Jefferson University researchers have tested a potential drug combination for MUM in a clinical trial that uncovers clues about why some of these tumors are resistant to treatment.
The study, published in the research journal Cancers , tested two drugs, defactinib and avutometinib, in 12 people with MUM. A novel technology called “synthetic lethality analysis” indicated that this combination should work to block two different pathways and suppress the growth of MUM cancer cells.
Unfortunately, the treatment did not produce the tumor shrinkage the researchers expected. After two treatment cycles, six patients had stable disease, meaning their tumors did not grow, while six patients’ disease worsened.
“We were hoping that this was going to be a miracle combination,” says oncologist and senior author of the study Takami Sato, MD, PhD .
Although it was not what they had hoped for, the researchers saw an opportunity to learn from the unexpected results. They compared tumor samples taken before and after treatment and looked for differences between tumors that remained stable and those that continued to grow.
They saw that levels of an enzyme called ALDH1A3 increased after treatment in several patients whose disease progressed, while patients whose disease remained stable tended to have lower levels. Previous research has linked high levels of ALDH1A3 with treatment resistance.
The team also found that tumors that progressed maintained biochemical signals that help cancer cells survive. These findings could help researchers identify ways to overcome resistance.
“Patients are still desperate, and we will keep looking,” says oncologist and lead researcher of the study Rino Seedor, MD . Indeed, the team is now considering a new combination treatment based on the results of this study.
Together, the study highlights how moving discoveries from the laboratory into the clinic and then bringing what is learned back to the laboratory is “crucial to moving the science forward and developing better therapies,” Dr. Seedor says.
By Roni Dengler