The role of the NSC adviser does not exist in a vacuum; and ultimately, the president is responsible, and the organization's culture relevant, to how many tasks the adviser takes on. For example, brokerage and political advocacy form a combustible mix. Personal advocacy may compromise the perception of the adviser's neutrality while creating the new perception of that of a competitor to other participants. Yet, in limited forms, advocacy is beneficial-- if a discussion is not balanced and the president needs to hear an underrepresented point-of-view. "The broker role is no cure all, and it may not be applicable to all presidents or all decision making contacts," Burke concludes. "But absent an effective process, of course, the probabilities of sound decisions are likely lessened."
This article is published in the current issue of Presidential Studies Quarterly. Media wishing to receive a PDF, please contact JournalNews@bos.blackwellpublishing.net .
Presidential Studies Quarterly is the only scholarly journal that focuses on the most powerful political figure in the world - the president of the United States. It is published by the Center for the Study of the Presidency.
John P. Burke is a professor of political science at the University of Vermont. He specializes in American politics, the American presidency, and ethics and public affairs. He has published numerous articles and seven books.
Dr. Burke is available for questions and interviews.
Presidential Studies Quarterly