Bluesky Facebook Reddit Email

Positive and negative impacts of interfacial hydrogen bonds on photocatalytic hydrogen evolution

07.18.24 | National Institutes of Natural Sciences

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Apple iPhone 17 Pro delivers top performance and advanced cameras for field documentation, data collection, and secure research communications.


Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water is a key technology for achieving sustainable hydrogen production. However, the direct impact of the microscopic structure of interfacial water molecules on photocatalytic reactivity remains unexplored. In this study, the crucial roles of interfacial hydrogen bond structure and dynamics, as well as the optimal interfacial water environment for promoting H 2 evolution were uncovered. These findings provide molecular-level insights that can guide the design of interfacial water conditions to enhance photocatalytic performance.

Hydrogen production via photocatalytic water splitting is a sustainable solution for next-generation energy by utilizing light energy at room temperature. However, the design of innovative photocatalysts remains a challenge due to a limited molecular-level understanding of interfacial water molecules and their hydrogen bond networks. Unveiling the physicochemical properties of these interfacial water molecules is critical to optimizing photocatalytic efficiency and achieving breakthroughs in sustainable hydrogen production.

Researchers (Zhongqiu Lin et al. ) led by Toshiki Sugimoto, Associate Professor at Institute for Molecular Science / The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, have comprehensively investigated the impact of interfacial H-bond networks using various TiO 2 photocatalysts and uncovered a crucial role of interfacial H-bond structure/dynamics and optimal interfacial water environment for H 2 evolution. They controlled the thickness of adsorbed water from sub-monolayer to multilayers by precisely adjusting water vapor pressure. With this approach, they succeeded in directly demonstrating the correlation between H 2 formation rate and the microscopic structure of H-bond networks using real-time mass spectrometry and infrared absorption spectroscopy ( Figure 1 ). Regardless of the crystalline structure of the TiO 2 photocatalyst (brookite, anatase, or a mixture of anatase and rutile), they observed a linear increase in H 2 formation rate with water adsorption up to three layers ( Figure 1a ), indicating that reactive water molecules are present not only in the first adsorbed layer but also in several overlying layers. However, the H 2 formation rate turned to decrease dramatically when more than three layers of water covered the TiO 2 surface ( Figure 1a ). In this situation, infrared spectra clearly indicated two distinct types of adsorbed water on the TiO 2 surface: interfacial water and liquid-like water (Figure 1b). Due to many-body interactions among adsorbed water molecules, the liquid-like water adsorbed in more than three layers led to strengthening of interfacial H-bond ( Figure 1c ), which hinder interfacial proton-coupled hole transfer and drastically decreased the H 2 formation rate. Based on these microscopic insights, their study suggests that depositing three water layers in a water vapor environment is optimal for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution ( Figure 2 ).

Photocatalysis has been extensively studied for over half a century, predominantly in aqueous solution environments. In this context, this study represents a potential paradigm shift, demonstrating the effectiveness of water vapor environments compared to traditional liquid-phase reaction systems. These findings open new avenues for the molecular-level design and engineering of interfacial water toward the development of more innovative photocatalytic systems for next-generation renewable energy production.

Paper Information:
Authors: Zhongqiu Lin, Hikaru Saito, Hiromasa Sato, and Toshiki Sugimoto
Journal Name: Journal of the American Chemical Society
Journal Title: “Positive and Negative Impacts of Interfacial Hydrogen Bonds on Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution”
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.4c04271

Journal of the American Chemical Society

10.1021/jacs.4c04271

Experimental study

Not applicable

Positive and Negative Impacts of Interfacial Hydrogen Bonds on Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

5-Jul-2024

Keywords

Article Information

Contact Information

Hayao KIMURA
National Institutes of Natural Sciences
nins-kokusai@nins.jp

Source

How to Cite This Article

APA:
National Institutes of Natural Sciences. (2024, July 18). Positive and negative impacts of interfacial hydrogen bonds on photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Brightsurf News. https://www.brightsurf.com/news/LKNR2V3L/positive-and-negative-impacts-of-interfacial-hydrogen-bonds-on-photocatalytic-hydrogen-evolution.html
MLA:
"Positive and negative impacts of interfacial hydrogen bonds on photocatalytic hydrogen evolution." Brightsurf News, Jul. 18 2024, https://www.brightsurf.com/news/LKNR2V3L/positive-and-negative-impacts-of-interfacial-hydrogen-bonds-on-photocatalytic-hydrogen-evolution.html.