Bluesky Facebook Reddit Email

Incidental pulmonary embolism on chest CT: AI vs. clinical reports

07.13.22 | American Roentgen Ray Society

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Apple iPhone 17 Pro delivers top performance and advanced cameras for field documentation, data collection, and secure research communications.


Leesburg, VA, July 13, 2022 According to ARRS’ American Journal of Roentgenology ( AJR ) , an AI tool for detection of incidental pulmonary embolus (iPE) on conventional contrast-enhanced chest CT examinations had high NPV and moderate PPV for detection, even finding some iPEs missed by radiologists.

“Potential applications of the AI tool include serving as a second reader to help detect additional iPEs or as a worklist triage tool to allow earlier iPE detection and intervention,” wrote lead investigator Kiran Batra from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. “Various explanations of misclassifications by the AI tool (both false positives and false negatives) were identified, to provide targets for model improvement.”

Batra and colleagues’ retrospective study included 2,555 patients (1,340 women, 1,215 men; mean age, 53.6 years) who underwent 3,003 conventional contrast-enhanced chest CT examinations between September 2019 and February 2020 at Parkland Health in Dallas, TX. Using an FDA-approved, commercially available AI tool (Aidoc, New York, NY) to detect acute iPE on the images, a vendor-supplied natural language processing algorithm (RepScheme, Tel Aviv, Israel) was then applied to the clinical reports to identify examinations interpreted as positive for iPE.

Ultimately, the commercial AI tool had NPV of 99.8% and PPV of 86.7% for detection of iPE on conventional contrast-enhanced chest CT examinations (i.e., not using CT pulmonary angiography protocols). Of 40 iPEs present in the team’s study sample, 7 were detected only by the clinical reports, and 4 were detected only by AI.

Noting that both the AI tool and clinical reports detected iPEs missed by the other method, “the diagnostic performance of the AI tool did not show significant variation across study subgroups,” the authors of this AJR article added .

North America’s first radiological society, the American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) remains dedicated to the advancement of medicine through the profession of medical imaging and its allied sciences. An international forum for progress in radiology since the discovery of the x-ray, ARRS maintains its mission of improving health through a community committed to advancing knowledge and skills with the world’s longest continuously published radiology journal— American Journal of Roentgenology —the ARRS Annual Meeting, InPractice magazine, topical symposia, myriad multimedia educational materials, as well as awarding scholarships via The Roentgen Fund ®.

MEDIA CONTACT :

Logan K. Young, PIO

44211 Slatestone Court

Leesburg, VA 20176

703-858-4332

lyoung@arrs.org

American Journal of Roentgenology

10.2214/AJR.22.27895

Imaging analysis

People

Detection of Incidental Pulmonary Embolism on Conventional Contrast-Enhanced Chest CT: Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm and Clinical Reports

13-Jul-2022

No relevant disclosures.

Keywords

Article Information

Contact Information

Logan Young
American Roentgen Ray Society
lyoung@arrs.org

Source

How to Cite This Article

APA:
American Roentgen Ray Society. (2022, July 13). Incidental pulmonary embolism on chest CT: AI vs. clinical reports. Brightsurf News. https://www.brightsurf.com/news/LPEVO9M8/incidental-pulmonary-embolism-on-chest-ct-ai-vs-clinical-reports.html
MLA:
"Incidental pulmonary embolism on chest CT: AI vs. clinical reports." Brightsurf News, Jul. 13 2022, https://www.brightsurf.com/news/LPEVO9M8/incidental-pulmonary-embolism-on-chest-ct-ai-vs-clinical-reports.html.