An analysis published today in the The BMJ examines the risks faced by frontline workers in the United States during the pandemic and suggests reforms that could protect population health and save lives.
Lead author Professor David Michaels at the George Washington University and his colleagues note that from the onset laws and regulations in the United States inadequately protected frontline workers. The gaps allowed a rapid spread of disease in US workplaces like meat packing plants. At the same time, these essential workers were rarely seen as a population that needed special attention or protections.
“The consequences of these failures were appalling and led to tens of thousands of deaths in frontline workers,” said Michaels, who is a professor of environmental and occupational health at the GW Milken Institute School of Public Health. “The risk of exposure was exacerbated by race- and labor-related economic inequality, resulting in disproportionally more of the nation’s Black and Hispanic workers being killed or sickened by the virus.” Michaels also served as the administrator for the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration from 2009 to 2017, the longest serving administrator in the agency’s history.
Key findings from the analysis:
The analysis, US workers during the covid-19 pandemic: uneven risks, protections and predictable consequences, was authored by Michaels, Emily Spieler at Northeastern University School of Law and Gregory Wagner at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.
The piece is the first of a series of articles on US lessons learned during the pandemic. The series was published in The BMJ on Jan. 29.
-GW-
BMJ
US workers during the covid-19 pandemic: uneven risks, inadequate protections, and predictable consequences
29-Jan-2024