The optimal surgical management for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (SSICH) remains controversial because conventional approaches often fail to balance rapid decompression with effective hematoma evacuation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new combined surgical strategies (“two-in-one” and “three-in-one”) versus conventional methods for SSICH.
This retrospective cohort study included 451 SSICH patients treated between January 2019 and December 2023. Based on clinical severity, patients were stratified into Group I (non-herniation, n = 374) and Group II (herniation, n = 77). Within each subgroup, patients were further categorized by treatment period: a historical control cohort (2019–2020) receiving conventional surgery, and an intervention cohort (2021–2023) receiving combined strategies (“two-in-one” for Group I; “three-in-one” for Group II). Outcomes included decompression time, hematoma evacuation rate, complications, and six-month functional recovery (Glasgow Outcome Scale/modified Rankin Scale), were compared.
In Group I, the “two-in-one” strategy achieved faster decompression (4.65 min) and a high evacuation rate (92.15%), which was comparable to neuroendoscopy alone (90.58%) and significantly higher than stereotactic aspiration alone (44.55%). This was associated with improved six-month outcomes (poor outcome rates were 39.39%, 54.35%, and 42.86% in Groups I-A, I-B, and I-C, respectively, overall P = 0.034). In Group II, the “three-in-one” strategy demonstrated shorter decompression time (4.73 vs. 37.85 min, P < 0.001) and higher evacuation rates (80.51% vs. 63.50%, P < 0.001) than decompressive craniectomy alone. Logistic regression further supported the prognostic advantage of the “two-in-one” strategy in Group I.
This integrated new combined surgical strategy synthesizes the technical principles of minimally invasive stereotactic aspiration, neuroendoscopic evacuation, and decompressive craniectomy. It is designed to address the critical pathophysiological challenges in SSICH by enabling both rapid reduction of ICP and efficient, visualized hematoma clearance. In this retrospective cohort, it showed procedural advantages over conventional approaches, with potential prognostic benefit in selected patients. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to validate its efficacy and clarify its indications.
Full text:
https://www.xiahepublishing.com/3067-6150/NSSS-2025-00043
The study was recently published in the Neurosurgical Subspecialties .
Neurosurgical Subspecialties (NSSS) is the official scientific journal of the Department of Neurosurgery at Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. NSSS aims to provide a forum for clinicians and scientists in the field, dedicated to publishing high-quality and peer-reviewed original research, reviews, opinions, commentaries, case reports, and letters across all neurosurgical subspecialties. These include but are not limited to traumatic brain injury, spinal and spinal cord neurosurgery, cerebrovascular disease, stereotactic radiosurgery, neuro-oncology, neurocritical care, neurosurgical nursing, neuroendoscopy, pediatric neurosurgery, peripheral neuropathy, and functional neurosurgery.
Follow us on X: @xiahepublishing
Follow us on LinkedIn: Xia & He Publishing Inc.
Neurosurgical Subspecialties
Application of A New Combined Surgical Strategy in Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study
28-Mar-2026