The lack of air-quality monitoring capabilities across the U.S. affects the health of millions of people and disproportionately impacts minority and low socioeconomic-status communities, say researchers in ACS’ Environmental Science & Technology Letters . Motivated by a new U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard for air pollution, the team employed a model for fine-scale air pollution mapping using real-world data, and it indicates there is an urgent need to address gaps in the agency’s monitoring network.
“The national air pollution monitoring network aims to act as an umbrella to protect all Americans,” says lead author Yuzhou Wang. “But we saw that unfortunately, millions of people, especially underrecognized populations, will not receive adequate protection from the monitors. Thus, they will receive fewer benefits from the more stringent standard.”
Most of the harmful effects from outdoor air pollution in the U.S. are linked to inhalation of fine particulate matter (PM). These suspended particles, like soot or liquid aerosol droplets, are smaller than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, garnering the designation PM 2.5 . In February 2024, to better protect Americans from health burdens caused by inhaling particles, the EPA adopted a more stringent standard for PM 2.5 .The EPA tracks compliance with air pollution standards through a network of about 1,000 costly and highly accurate monitoring stations placed in cities and towns nationwide. Prior research shows that people of color and people with low socioeconomic status living in the U.S. are disproportionately affected by outdoor PM 2.5 exposure. However, these populations have fewer monitoring stations than other areas to measure air pollutants, meaning they may not be fully protected by the tighter air pollution standards.
While the EPA is now modifying the national air pollution monitoring network to account for environmental justice, the adequacy of this network to correctly identify areas that do not meet the new air pollution standards has not been thoroughly investigated. So, researchers led by Joshua Apte used a statistical model to identify gaps in the monitoring network’s coverage across the continental U.S. The model is based on observations and geographic variables, called an empirical model, and it identifies potential areas with PM 2.5 levels that exceed the agency’s new lower standard.
To assess the monitoring gaps, Apte and colleagues compared PM 2.5 levels from 2017 to 2019 at both monitored and unmonitored locations, using PM 2.5 level predictions from the U.S. Center for Air, Climate, and Energy Solutions and population data from the 2020 U.S. Census. Their findings revealed that the network misses pollution hotspots and underestimates exposure disparities, which highlights the need for enhanced monitoring in historically underrecognized communities. Overall, they find that:
“Fortunately, even adding 10 monitors in the right places could make a big difference in correctly identifying which cities are breathing unhealthy air,” says Apte. However, he adds that “our network of about 1,000 official regulatory air monitors is generally not well-suited for capturing exposure disparities in every city in the country. There are just too few monitors to capture every hotspot.”
The team identified metro locations to add new air pollution monitors across the U.S. that could help identify large populations that currently breathe air more polluted than the EPA’s new standards. The metro areas are in Texas, Ohio, California, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Missouri and Idaho.
The authors acknowledge funding from Google.org.
###
The American Chemical Society (ACS) is a nonprofit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. ACS’ mission is to advance the broader chemistry enterprise and its practitioners for the benefit of Earth and all its people. The Society is a global leader in promoting excellence in science education and providing access to chemistry-related information and research through its multiple research solutions, peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences, e-books and weekly news periodical Chemical & Engineering News . ACS journals are among the most cited, most trusted and most read within the scientific literature; however, ACS itself does not conduct chemical research. As a leader in scientific information solutions, its CAS division partners with global innovators to accelerate breakthroughs by curating, connecting and analyzing the world’s scientific knowledge. ACS’ main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.
Registered journalists can subscribe to the ACS journalist news portal on EurekAlert! to access embargoed and public science press releases. For media inquiries, contact newsroom@acs.org .
Note: ACS does not conduct research but publishes and publicizes peer-reviewed scientific studies.
Follow us: X, formerly Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn | Instagram
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
“U.S. ambient air monitoring network has inadequate coverage under new PM2.5 standard”
15-Oct-2024