The NIH Enhanced Access policy lacks a definitive deadline for making research results available, putting grant recipients in a difficult position. Advocates urge the agency to report on progress toward full taxpayer access using metrics such as the proportion of deposited articles and lag time between publication and availability.
The Alliance for Taxpayer Access urges NIH to provide timely and complete access to its research, citing the importance of public investment in medical innovation. A delayed announcement on enhanced public access to NIH research has disappointed patient advocates and researchers.
The patientINFORM consortium, led by commercial giants Elsevier, Springer, and Wiley, has sparked controversy among advocates for enhanced public access to research. While the proposal aims to make taxpayer-funded research available, critics argue it discriminates among illnesses without justification and fails to respect all patients'...
The Alliance for Taxpayer Access congratulates Congress and NIH on their public access plan, which aims to make taxpayer-funded biomedical research accessible online at no extra cost. The plan's compromise approach balances publisher interests with public access, addressing the 'Fleecing of America' issue highlighted by NBC News.
Intellectual property experts argue that the NIH proposed policy does not alter existing copyright law, but rather builds on current practice to facilitate public access to research. This change is seen as advancing the NIH's aim to use today's information technologies to fulfill its public mission.
Academic leaders express frustration with restricted access to research, citing difficulties in accessing articles from NIH-funded science. A six-month delay is seen as sufficient to address concerns about publishers' costs, while a compromise between the academy and publishing industry is proposed to ensure open access.