Add BrightSurf on Google Email

Workplace autopilot threatens security risk perception

A study by University of Leeds researchers found that human psychology and automatic pilot can compromise data security. Employees tend to oversimplify risks and fail to consider consequences, leading to errors. To improve security, organisations should design systems with user involvement and implement triggers for critical thinking.

SourceUniversity of Leeds·JournalRisk Analysis·DateFeb 8, 2008

Rapid analysis could cut health risks of volcanic ash

A new, rapid and cheap way of estimating the potential risk posed to human health by volcanic ash has been devised. The technique uses state-of-the-art laser technology to analyze the grain size of samples from around the world, allowing emergency response teams to quickly measure the potential risk without high-tech equipment.

SourceDurham University·JournalJournal of Environmental Monitoring·DateOct 10, 2007

Smoking can harm the long-term effects of some oral surgery procedures

A recent study published in the Journal of Periodontology found that smokers experience greater residual gum recession after periodontal plastic surgery. The two-year study showed smokers had less desirable long-term outcomes compared to non-smokers. Quitting smoking before oral surgery can improve treatment success, according to experts.

SourceAmerican Academy of Periodontology·JournalJournal of Periodontology·DateSep 18, 2007

Folic acid supplementation lowers stroke risk

A meta-analysis of eight trials found folic acid supplementation lowers the concentration of homocysteine in the blood, reducing stroke risk by an average of 18%. The study also revealed greater reductions in risk when treatment lasted over 36 months or reduced homocysteine levels by more than 20%.

SourceThe Lancet_DELETED·JournalThe Lancet·DateMay 31, 2007

Bringing order to 'what if?'

The University of Southern California has developed a risk analysis system called Risk Analysis Workbench (RAW) to aid policymakers in quantifying risk estimates. The system, which will be used at all eight DHS research centers, uses data from web resources and artificial intelligence to perform 'what-if' risk analyses in a uniform way.

Smoking may be a risk factor for tuberculosis

A meta-analysis of 24 studies found that smokers are 40-60% more likely to develop tuberculosis disease after infection, with a 73% increased risk of becoming infected. Smoking may also decrease immune response or damage airway cilia, increasing TB risk.

SourceJAMA Network·JournalArchives of Internal Medicine·DateFeb 26, 2007

Smokers may be at greater risk of HIV infection

A review of published research suggests that cigarette smoking increases the risk of contracting HIV and progressing to AIDS. The study found that five out of six studies concluded smokers were more likely to become HIV positive, with varying risks ranging from 60% to tripling.

SourceBMJ Specialty Journals·JournalSexually Transmitted Infections·DateSep 20, 2006

New breast cancer screening tool helps general practitioners

A new screening tool called the pedigree assessment tool (PAT) effectively identifies women at risk for hereditary breast cancer, outperforming another commonly used tool in assessing individual patient risk. The PAT was 100% sensitive in identifying high-risk patients with potential BRCA mutations.

SourceWiley·JournalCancer·DateSep 11, 2006

Gene signature assesses breast cancer outcomes

A new gene signature of 70 genes linked to breast cancer was found to accurately predict patient outcomes, surpassing traditional risk classifiers. The study's results suggest that the 70-gene signature adds valuable prognostic information, which may lead to improved treatment decisions and reduced chemotherapy for eligible patients.

SourceJournal of the National Cancer Institute·JournalJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute·DateSep 5, 2006

U of M study finds new risk factors do not improve assessment of coronary heart disease risk

A large study found that measuring C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and other novel risk markers does not improve the assessment of future coronary heart disease risk. The study, which followed over 15,000 adults, suggests that standard risk factors such as age, cholesterol levels, and blood pressure remain the most accurate indicators.

SourceUniversity of Minnesota·JournalArchives of Internal Medicine·DateJul 10, 2006