Bottom Line: Acupuncture among women undergoing in vitro fertilization didn't affect live birth rates.
Why The Research Is Interesting: Acupuncture is widely used by women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), although there is conflicting evidence about its effect.
Who and When: 824 women undergoing IVF in Australia and New Zealand between June 2011 and October 2015, with follow-up until August 2016.
What (Study Interventions and Outcomes): Women received either acupuncture or a "sham" acupuncture procedure (where a noninvasive needle was placed away from the true acupuncture points) around the time of ovarian stimulation and embryo transfer (interventions); live birth (delivery of one or more living infants at greater than 20 weeks' gestation or birth weight of at least 14.1 ounces) (outcomes)
How (Study Design): This was a randomized clinical trial (RCT). RCTs allow for the strongest inferences to be made about the true effect of an intervention. However, not all RCT results can be replicated in real-world settings because patient characteristics or other variables may differ from those that were studied in the RCT.
Authors: Caroline A. Smith, Ph.D., Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia, and coauthors
Results: The rate of live births was 18.3 percent among women who received acupuncture and 17.8 percent among women who had the "sham" procedure, which resulted in a nonsignificant difference in live birth rates.
Study Limitations: The planned study sample size could not be achieved; the stage of embryo transfer was not balanced between the study groups; and the length of the treatment intervention was short.
###
For more details and to read the full study, please visit the For The Media website .
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.5336)
Editor's Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
Want to embed a link to this report in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.5336
JAMA