Researchers from the University of Warwick report that how faithfully we can build a 'digital twin' of a human brain depends not only on computing power, but fundamentally on how much of the living brain we can measure, validate and update over time.
A digital twin brain is not just a detailed simulation. It is a model, built from data taken from one specific person's brain, and kept updated as new measurements come in; a living individualised digital copy of your brain.
Now, a major review led by Warwick Manufacturing Group (WMG) researcher Dr Ruohan Zhang, published in Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering , tackles one of the biggest questions in biology: how close are we to actually building a digital twin of a living human brain?
Dr Ruohan Zhang, Assistant Professor in Applied Artificial Intelligence at WMG, University of Warwick said: “A digital twin brain is more than a large-scale simulation of the brain. The key distinction is that it represents a specific individual and remains connected to the biological brain through data. The reality of creating a digital twin brain changes the question from ‘How many brain cells can we simulate?’ to ‘How much of an individual living brain can we actually observe, constrain and update in order to create a true digital twin?’”
The clearest illustration of this challenge is scale: in simple nervous systems, like C. elegans, a roundworm with just 302 neurons, scientists can already map every synapse (brain connection). Human brains have around 86 billion neurons. Full synaptic-level mapping at that scale is currently far beyond technical and economic feasibility.
The researchers formalise this idea in a new framework, the measurement-defined emulation scale, which describes how the achievable fidelity of a digital twin brain is shaped by the resolution, completeness and updatability of the biological measurements available to constrain it, rather than simply by neuron count.
In practice, that means creating a feasible human digital twin brain will require combining several imperfect tools rather than waiting for a single perfect one: detailed electron microscopy in small local regions of the brain, broader statistical mapping of cell types and circuits, and whole-brain MRI to tie it all together for one individual.
But mapping structure is only half the challenge. Brains change constantly through learning, ageing, disease, and experience, so a meaningful digital twin must also keep pace over time rather than being frozen at the moment it is built. The review charts a path from today's largely static models toward ones that update as new data arrives, and eventually toward closed-loop systems where a digital twin's behaviour is checked against, and corrected by, the real brain it mirrors.
Professor Jianfeng Feng, University of Warwick and Fudan University added: “It is important to distinguish what digital twin brains can do today from the longer-term vision. Current models can already reproduce selected structural and functional features using individualised biological data. The next challenge is to make these models increasingly adaptive: able to update as new measurements arrive and eventually interact with the biological system in closed-loop settings.”
The researchers set out three ways the technology could be used:
Neuroscience: using digital twin brains as virtual platforms for running experiments that would be impossible or unethical on a living brain, potentially providing one of the earliest mature applications of the technology
Healthcare: using virtual patient twins for individualised disease prediction, treatment evaluation, and virtual intervention testing
AI: developing brain-inspired systems for studying perception, action, adaptation, and interaction
“The long-term potential of digital twins is not to build larger computational models, but models that are meaningfully connected to individuals and can help us understand how biological systems change over time,” concludes Dr Ruohan Zhang. “If developed responsibly, digital twin brains could become a shared technological and scientific infrastructure spanning healthcare, neuroscience and brain-inspired artificial intelligence.”
ENDS
Notes to Editors
The Review “Building digital twin brains at the limits of measurement” was commissioned by Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering and led by Dr Ruohan Zhang, Assistant Professor in Applied AI at WMG, University of Warwick, who is the first author and corresponding author of the Review. DOI: 10.1038/s44287-026-00320-8. The Review was selected to feature on the cover on the issue of the journal it was featured in.
Dr Ruohan Zhang ’s research focuses on Applied AI, particularly AI for Health, including brain health, human behaviour and cognition, multimodal biomedical data, digital twins, and personalised healthcare. Her research explores how AI can be used to better understand human health and behaviour and to develop more individualised approaches to prediction, modelling, and decision support.
For more information please contact:
Matt Higgs, PhD | Media & Communications Officer (Warwick Press Office)
Email: Matt.Higgs@warwick.ac.uk | Phone: +44(0)7880 175403
About the University of Warwick
Founded in 1965, the University of Warwick is a world-leading institution known for its commitment to era-defining innovation across research and education. A connected ecosystem of staff, students and alumni, the University fosters transformative learning, interdisciplinary collaboration, and bold industry partnerships across state-of-the-art facilities in the UK and global satellite hubs. Here, spirited thinkers push boundaries, experiment, and challenge convention to create a better world.
Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering
Literature review
Not applicable
Building digital twin brains at the limits of measurement
10-Aug-2026
The authors declare no competing interests.